I don't wanna strawman but if I understand your point is basically that money gives you: surgeries, status, an ability to move and your last sentence kinda sounds like betabuxxing.
I'm not denying one second that more money wouldn't improve our lives, there's tons of pros to having money. But I don't think that any of what you listed CREATES attraction, it only enhances it. Except the surgeries.
Firstly, Betabuxxing is purely using money to attract a gold digging non virgin whore in the hopes you'll get sex, this has nothing to do with the BIOLOGICAL REALITY, that women are attracted at a fundamental biological level to Resource Stability/Safety. This can be traced back evolutionarily, we can measure this. They are also highly attracted to status, now of course looks play the most important role, getting the metaphorical door unlocked, and depending on how much looks you have depends how long you can keep that door open, however women will be much more likely to keep that door open if you have an overabundance of status, OR can be biologically attractive at a primitive level related to resource stability.
Women are just as hypergamous everywhere, they're all the same. The only difference is that in some places, the societies they live in are strongly patriarchal and don't let them behave the way they want to. And also in some poor third world countries you could betabuxx like a millionaire there without really being all that rich by western standards.
If you view all women as being the same because of the biological inclination to be a certain way, then sure they're all the same, but that's objectively a dumb way of viewing it. All women are hypergamous yes, but we can measure that under certain criteria, not just in some shitty third world country, if a woman is raised in a proper family, traditional, small town, kept away from outside negative influences such as social media, etc, the rate at which she will be hypergamous is much much MUCH lower, virginity also ties into hypergamy aswell, the less partners a woman has at a young age, the less hypergamous she will be at a young age.
You can very well move to an area that is less hypergamous, or rather, an area where women are more likely to be less hypergamous in relation to you.
But the women are still the same, you still won't be attractive to them if you're really ugly or absurdly short.
Not even most people on here are Extremely Ugly, or Absurdly Short, most peoples problems on here typically stem from where they live primarily, and the abundance of hypergamous slags around them, and I gurantee that the majority of people here could escape Inceldom if they had money and utilized it properly in all the various forms of maxxing. Looksmaxxing, Statusmaxxing, Locationmaxxing, etc. Some people here even REFUSE to do so, and would rather actively escortcel. Do you honestly think someone who is at worst a 4/10 who has enough money to pump prime JB escorts multiple times a week, especially if they're even slightly NT, has any right to claim to be an Incel?
Of course they don't, they're a degenerate who belongs on a cross, while truecels rot in sexless lives. The fact is, you're a truecel if you're low status, because girls would rather fuck a dog because of their status, than someone with low status and with no money in the urban west.
BrendioEEE believes he'd ascend if he had a steady job and a car. Imagine needing only those basic things and still hanging around on this forum.
Lmao I just realized it was him. I didn't check exactly who I was replying to. His face mogs the shit out of mine, he just needs to lose weight, no wonder he believes in redpill stuff, he has some actual potential.
I already have lost 180LB, however i'm 5'5, live in a cyberpunk dystopia where people hate me because i'm short and white, and have deformed loose skin.
I'm actually more Blackpilled than anyone on the forum.
