Total Imbecile
Honorary ethnic
★★★★★
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2017
- Posts
- 10,543
How is that NSFW?
Its NSFW, stop acting like a woman trying to act dumb and dance around the rules.
How is that NSFW?
If you are somehow trying to imply that it's NSFW, because the waifu has semen on her face... I must let you know that the substance is actualy an egg white.Its NSFW, stop acting like a woman trying to act dumb and dance around the rules.
@Kointo @Indari @theultimate341 @MogekoLord @Maeror @torujo What do you guys think?
Also screw you haters @VLÖ @Total Imbecile
careercelAll avatars should be pictures of ainsley tbh
But this here is a masterpiece
The one you have right now is gross if real. Who the fuck would jizz on a toy.
Jeeeeezuzz
it's also fairly popular on 4chanJeeeeezuzz
Which board?it's also fairly popular on 4chan
Too obscene imoHow is that NSFW?
I remember threads about this poping on Random every now and themWhich board?
Says the guy with the female avatari reported it. it was a pathetically low effort attempt at circumventing the rules, you should feel bad. this is not a porn site and you should stop being so obsessed with worshipping females.
You've seen a photo of Dekim? How do you know he's a truecel, or they are fakecels?sorry to hear about that.
sucks hearing that they would report truecels, but not fakecels. lol they're probably fakecels themselves wanting to make this forum a safe space for themselves.
The thing that pisses me off the most, is that people who reported me are probobly some edgelords with low post counts that consist of nothing worth mentioning.
Are you saying that I don't contribute? You can check my thread history; I've made more black pilled posts than you have. There's plenty of them.How does a person who spent months begging to be mod, contribute nothing whatsoever to moderating and maintaining this place?
Sorry to hear thatI miss my miranda avi
People reported your avatar? Lol. Fuck I miss it already
Cucki reported it. it was a pathetically low effort attempt at circumventing the rules, you should feel bad. this is not a porn site and you should stop being so obsessed with worshipping females.
Well... If certain cucks didn't snitch, it would have stayed even longer.O I remember your avatar. I was actually surprised it stayed for so long lmao
Since you keep bringing this up, I went through your activity in the past month. Here is what I've dug up:Are you saying that I don't contribute? You can check my thread history; I've made more black pilled posts than you have. There's plenty of them.
Anyways, I should be a Mod, not you.
One of my black pilled threads got stickied the other day by Sergeantincel. What have you been doing lately? Probably dog shit as per usual.
but you do not even existi reported it.
it's just offtopic thought nothing is meant to be taken seriously hereSince you keep bringing this up, I went through your activity in the past month. Here is what I've dug up:
April Thread Creation Activity
1. Trash-tier, low-effort threads which are effectively useless, meaningless, and in some cases have been reported: 32
2. Trash-tier threads that are so trash that they were deleted: 1
3. Blackpilled, potentially useful/engaging/interesting threads: 4
4. Blackpilled, but the same regurgitated shit everyone already knows and says type of theads: 7
So, while I never argued that you don't make blackpilled threads, thank you for motivating me to go through your history and discover that statistically speaking, only about 9% of your threads would be considered both blackpilled and as contributions to the community, while a full 74% are off-topic low-effort posts. Suffice to say that these are not flattering statistics.
Now, since you asked me what I've been doing lately, I will admit that I haven't made any threads recently on the subject of the blackpill, but that will be corrected soon as I have actually been doing relevant research, so you can await the atomic blackpill coming soon. I'm fairly confident that the sheer volume and depth of research will more than compensate for my absence due to my work and studies, and will make your limited contributions over the past month seem paltry in comparison.
Posting threads is a metric that YOU chose, not me - please refer to the fact that I said that you have contributed nothing to the moderation and maintenance of this site, meaning reports of the fakecels you complain about. In fact, there have been multiple reports about YOU, so if anything, you have actively contributed to giving us work. As you well know, after a recent string of reports, I sent you a polite PM detailing the stance of moderation on your behavior at that point. Now, if you consider the fact that we had a discussion about it, and the fact that the PM I sent was lengthier than the majority of your threads, you can see that as MY contribution to this site IN SPITE of your activity. If you then extrapolate this to the fact that you are not the only case I have handled this month in a similar manner, I am sure that you will see how foolish it is for you to try and compare contributions to this site from your laughable position.
In the past month I have:
1. Made two threads, one of them a PSA about new site functionality, the other sharing a blackpilling article which demonstrates how the media treats female virginity as opposed to how incels are treated in the media. This means that while I've made 2 threads, both were useful and/or blackpilled.
2. I have processed 54 reports, which I believe is the second-most of all moderators after Sergeant, but I could be mistaken on that figure. Each report necessitates the completion of a form, and often a personalized PM to go along with it. I have also banned numerous alt accounts of people such as whogivesafucc who were using them to dodge bans and troll, through investigative work and following up on leads submitted by our users (something which, again, you have no history of doing, as you contribute nothing to moderation and maintenance besides getting your own posts/threads reported).
3. Remained active on the Discord, which includes its own set of responsibilities in terms of moderation.
4. Participated in numerous discussions with the rest of the moderation staff about users, policy, current events, and potential enhancements to the site. A conservative estimate would be about 10 manhours in the month of April have been devoted to this.
As such, I think it's quite evident why you're not a moderator here despite your insistence to become one and why your petty finger-pointing is misguided at best.
Just make a no alt account rule since everything apparently trolling.Since you keep bringing this up, I went through your activity in the past month. Here is what I've dug up:
April Thread Creation Activity
1. Trash-tier, low-effort threads which are effectively useless, meaningless, and in some cases have been reported: 32
2. Trash-tier threads that are so trash that they were deleted: 1
3. Blackpilled, potentially useful/engaging/interesting threads: 4
4. Blackpilled, but the same regurgitated shit everyone already knows and says type of theads: 7
So, while I never argued that you don't make blackpilled threads, thank you for motivating me to go through your history and discover that statistically speaking, only about 9% of your threads would be considered both blackpilled and as contributions to the community, while a full 74% are off-topic low-effort posts. Suffice to say that these are not flattering statistics.
Now, since you asked me what I've been doing lately, I will admit that I haven't made any threads recently on the subject of the blackpill, but that will be corrected soon as I have actually been doing relevant research, so you can await the atomic blackpill coming soon. I'm fairly confident that the sheer volume and depth of research will more than compensate for my absence due to my work and studies, and will make your limited contributions over the past month seem paltry in comparison.
Posting threads is a metric that YOU chose, not me - please refer to the fact that I said that you have contributed nothing to the moderation and maintenance of this site, meaning reports of the fakecels you complain about. In fact, there have been multiple reports about YOU, so if anything, you have actively contributed to giving us work. As you well know, after a recent string of reports, I sent you a polite PM detailing the stance of moderation on your behavior at that point. Now, if you consider the fact that we had a discussion about it, and the fact that the PM I sent was lengthier than the majority of your threads, you can see that as MY contribution to this site IN SPITE of your activity. If you then extrapolate this to the fact that you are not the only case I have handled this month in a similar manner, I am sure that you will see how foolish it is for you to try and compare contributions to this site from your laughable position.
In the past month I have:
1. Made two threads, one of them a PSA about new site functionality, the other sharing a blackpilling article which demonstrates how the media treats female virginity as opposed to how incels are treated in the media. This means that while I've made 2 threads, both were useful and/or blackpilled.
2. I have processed 54 reports, which I believe is the second-most of all moderators after Sergeant, but I could be mistaken on that figure. Each report necessitates the completion of a form, and often a personalized PM to go along with it. I have also banned numerous alt accounts of people such as whogivesafucc who were using them to dodge bans and troll, through investigative work and following up on leads submitted by our users (something which, again, you have no history of doing, as you contribute nothing to moderation and maintenance besides getting your own posts/threads reported).
3. Remained active on the Discord, which includes its own set of responsibilities in terms of moderation.
4. Participated in numerous discussions with the rest of the moderation staff about users, policy, current events, and potential enhancements to the site. A conservative estimate would be about 10 manhours in the month of April have been devoted to this.
As such, I think it's quite evident why you're not a moderator here despite your insistence to become one and why your petty finger-pointing is misguided at best.
I don't disagree with that, but for a poster who claims to be making substantial contributions to the site, claims to be deserving of a moderator position, and at the same time judges my own contributions to the site, having a 74%+ useless thread post rate as well as the other factors I listed above is not something that mirrors or substantiates that statement.it's just offtopic thought nothing is meant to be taken seriously here
Oh please, you always low ball everyone. I've always willing to acknowledge that you're a busy person, but nevermind...Since you keep bringing this up, I went through your activity in the past month. Here is what I've dug up:
April Thread Creation Activity
1. Trash-tier, low-effort threads which are effectively useless, meaningless, and in some cases have been reported: 32
2. Trash-tier threads that are so trash that they were deleted: 1
3. Blackpilled, potentially useful/engaging/interesting threads: 4
4. Blackpilled, but the same regurgitated shit everyone already knows and says type of theads: 7
So, while I never argued that you don't make blackpilled threads, thank you for motivating me to go through your history and discover that statistically speaking, only about 9% of your threads would be considered both blackpilled and as contributions to the community, while a full 74% are off-topic low-effort posts. Suffice to say that these are not flattering statistics.
Now, since you asked me what I've been doing lately, I will admit that I haven't made any threads recently on the subject of the blackpill, but that will be corrected soon as I have actually been doing relevant research, so you can await the atomic blackpill coming soon. I'm fairly confident that the sheer volume and depth of research will more than compensate for my absence due to my work and studies, and will make your limited contributions over the past month seem paltry in comparison.
Posting threads is a metric that YOU chose, not me - please refer to the fact that I said that you have contributed nothing to the moderation and maintenance of this site, meaning reports of the fakecels you complain about. In fact, there have been multiple reports about YOU, so if anything, you have actively contributed to giving us work. As you well know, after a recent string of reports, I sent you a polite PM detailing the stance of moderation on your behavior at that point. Now, if you consider the fact that we had a discussion about it, and the fact that the PM I sent was lengthier than the majority of your threads, you can see that as MY contribution to this site IN SPITE of your activity. If you then extrapolate this to the fact that you are not the only case I have handled this month in a similar manner, I am sure that you will see how foolish it is for you to try and compare contributions to this site from your laughable position.
In the past month I have:
1. Made two threads, one of them a PSA about new site functionality, the other sharing a blackpilling article which demonstrates how the media treats female virginity as opposed to how incels are treated in the media. This means that while I've made 2 threads, both were useful and/or blackpilled.
2. I have processed 54 reports, which I believe is the second-most of all moderators after Sergeant, but I could be mistaken on that figure. Each report necessitates the completion of a form, and often a personalized PM to go along with it. I have also banned numerous alt accounts of people such as whogivesafucc who were using them to dodge bans and troll, through investigative work and following up on leads submitted by our users (something which, again, you have no history of doing, as you contribute nothing to moderation and maintenance besides getting your own posts/threads reported).
3. Remained active on the Discord, which includes its own set of responsibilities in terms of moderation.
4. Participated in numerous discussions with the rest of the moderation staff about users, policy, current events, and potential enhancements to the site. A conservative estimate would be about 10 manhours in the month of April have been devoted to this.
As such, I think it's quite evident why you're not a moderator here despite and why your petty finger-pointing is misguided at best.
You, personally, don't have to care. No one is asking you to. But if you care about this site, you should care about how discourse is handled on it when considering the sensitivity of the subject. Perhaps caring about the individuals involved or discussed is not a prerequisite for having a logically sound viewpoint? Or if that's off base of me to assume, then perhaps not caring is enough of a reason not to post 0 content stream of consciousness responses? Since you clearly care so little, I'm surprised you mustered the effort.
The "attitude" stems from you giving brain dead 1 line responses to thought-out arguments. We get it, you're happy to be a useless sack of potatoes in your mother's basement, you're a misanthrope, so edgy. To come into an argument to basically say "I don't care about this," is just a waste of time, space, and keyboard presses.
You're entitled to your beliefs but consider the fact that while we support free speech, we also have rules in place that effectively go against free speech. Are you going to champion the cause of allowing women and bluepilled normies to post here as well, since you're so pro-free speech? Or does your belief system stop working when it exceeds your own personal interests? I guess that is what is to be expected of a misanthrope, and that's fine, but don't pretend to pledge allegiance to a higher call to arms than what you're truly fighting for.
Since we're on the topic, please point out where in my original post that you gave your negative IQ response to that I suggested we restrict free speech? I'm pretty confident that all I did was lay down some logical framework for a discussion on the matter, as people tend to argue about opposite subtopics when discussing the broad term of pedophilia. What I said about caring about the site was not about its continuation but about its quality if discourse. Again, please actually try to rub two braincells together when reading my posts so that your responses follow logically. Also, consider that perhaps because of your "unique" stance on humanity, children, morals, etc. that some posts and arguments on this forum aren't tailored to your particular flavor of edge. You will find plenty of things that you don't care about on this forum, as do I. Instead of saying "lol who cares tho" you could either think about why these people care and give a thought-out response or just move on. Remember: no low effort and spam allowed, as per the rules. I imagine this will be your next clarion call.
A convenient overgeneralization to make; I didn't feel it necessary to openly categorize each thread into each specific category, and naturally some people will categorize them differently from others. However, if we simply make the distinction between "blackpilled" and "off-topic" without any qualifying and subjective adjectives such as "useless," the numbers don't change much.Oh please, you always low ball everyone.
I don't require any validation or acknowledgement from you, but I'll continue this train of thought later.I've always willing to acknowledge that you're a busy person, but nevermind...
While it is true that EVERYONE makes a low-effort post occasionally, it is not true that they make them with as great a frequency as thread topics as others who do (you). You're constructing a strawman here, as our topic of discussion was never low-effort POSTS; I opened the topic of you not contributing to moderation and maintenence, but you changed it to being your contributions to the site in the form of blackpilled THREADS (and threads in general). You're consistently changing the topic of discussion, which isn't going unnoticed and is a poor tactic for argument.1. You too yourself made countless of low effort posts, but yet critercise low effort posts. You probably begged Serge to have low-effort posts ruled-in, I'm guessing?
2. So what if some black pilled threads are regurgitated? I've seen you gotten intrigued by some and I feel more of them could've been stickied especially my thread "On Male Spaces" and "Female Sexual Behaviour," and many more.
3. Also just lol at you trying to get-by community in-bound posting. I know that you've negatively skewed the stats in your favor.
4. I do make reports, only when necessary. Like you, I don't see all of the posts around.
I'm tired of you, low-balling me. I've lost my patience with you.
You cause a massive distress on this forum for everyone. Innately people are overly angst of those that are of a higher authority (i.e. Police), but it's you that makes shit worse for you. Why do think out of all the Mods; that most people here despise you? You said a lot of asinine things around here. There are people that have more of a problem with you than me. Many people would be glad to see you get demodded and even banned.
Oh and here are some examples of you low-balling:
Anyways, I don't have the time to go through 2000+ posts, but if I key-word search "mother, loser, and Blickpall." I'm sure many posts of your posts, would come up. I'll be sure to search up more latter on.
Also when I made the thread about "Female Insecurities," I've gotten criticized by a few users and guess what? Then you and some other Mod asked the Admin if you could ban me. It wasn't even against the rules. Then you guys went through scurrying my threads/post trying to look for any reason to ban me or looking through any spec of reason to ban me.
I've been told that there are no Mods that have a personal bias or vendetta against certain users, but it turns out to be untrue.
And of course, (I felt like) Sergeantincel had to banned me to avoid you or whomever who perm banning me
I'm skeptical about what you said here. If you don't care then you'll run into some of the same problems that you'll face again. Seeing the amount of conflicts you get yourself into, is already a tell tale sign that something is up or wrong with you.The fact is, I don't care if people like me. I don't care if people talk shit about me or want me removed. I don't care about any of that, because first of all, it is impossible to please everyone. I don't care about being popular here or in real life. The only thing I care about as a moderator is that my moderator actions are justified, and that they are viewed as satisfactory by the rest of the moderation staff.
Your original post and other posts made it seem like that it recalls upon from some past events. I don't care about the cherry-picking thing, almost everyone does it.So, instead of you trying to augment your argument and position with patent falsehoods and saying you're "sure many posts would come up," and that you'll "search up more later on," you could actually, you know, provide evidence to back your statements beyond isolated incidents months ago. Not that that would do you any good, because as I said before:
he like jacking off to jav he doesn't worship females.i reported it. it was a pathetically low effort attempt at circumventing the rules, you should feel bad. this is not a porn site and you should stop being so obsessed with worshipping females.