Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Tinder is the ONLY objective measure of your attractiveness

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2047
  • Start date
Deleted member 2047

Deleted member 2047

Self-banned
-
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Posts
3,396
Normanoids are always talking about how its "just tinder bro" and "tinder doesn't matter" are coping hard

Tinder is the NUMBER ONE measure of your worth. Take the average number of matches out of 10 you get for each swipe, and thats your rating.
 
Tinder essentially summarises the entirety of human society. Which is:

- Women are king, in virtually every way. They have all the power.
- Men do all the work
- 80% of men are trash and unwanted

An analogy: imagine the pyramids being built in ancient Egypt. Each and every woman is a pharaoh. They all get a pyramid each. Men are the slaves building the pyramids. Once each pyramid is finished, the femoid gets to choose the top 20% of manslaves that built the pyramid (the chads) whom she will live with in the pyramid and mate with contantly like a queen bee. The babies born will feed back into the system. The remaining bottom 80% of men (the incels) are sacrificed to the great Vagina God (basically thrown into the Nile and eaten by crocs or whatever - nobody gives a fuck).
 
I tried it for 2 months when i was 20, only matched with bots and i swiped every day. Pretty much confirmed it was over for me after trying pof. Uk females are as bad as US.
 
Tinder is accurate. Females get the most options so they are picky while males struggle to get anything so they are desperate
 
Sparky said:
Location matters a lot on tinder

Which one is favourable then?
 
wandercamp said:
Normanoids are always talking about how its "just tinder bro" and "tinder doesn't matter" are coping hard

Tinder is the NUMBER ONE measure of your worth. Take the average number of matches out of 10 you get for each swipe, and thats your rating.

I like the idea of the test. SO out of a 150+ tinder accounts I've swiped left. I got 0. So that means I am a 0.00/10 confirmed.
 
wandercamp said:
Normanoids are always talking about how its "just tinder bro" and "tinder doesn't matter" are coping hard

Tinder is the NUMBER ONE measure of your worth. Take the average number of matches out of 10 you get for each swipe, and thats your rating.

Mostly true but you need to expand the no. of swipes to 100 to get an accurate rating. Even then psl 7-8 Chads I've seen get around 60-70 matches per 100 swipes, so tinder is even harsher than psl rating (which are fucking designed to be realistic and low compared to normie rates)
 
Tinder is a good measure of hypergamy, but not really your "worth". You get different matches in different countries. The less matches you get, the more hypergamy there is.
 
I used "cheating" apps to mass-swipe 60,000 women.

LMFAO. 0 matches.

Call me a fakecel.
 
Just thinking about this today..fuck I'm ugly-ER than I want to admit. I get infrequent matches that block me when I send a msg. I must like the humiliation to even bother anymore.
 
Lol at 50 matches in 100 = 5/10. Even a top tier gigachad wouldn't get that many because of how the algorithm works.

Just because you swipe right on a girl doesn't mean you appear in her stack (i.e. the cards she sees when she is swiping). Infact, given guys swipe right a LOT more than girls, you probably won't be appearing in that stack, and if you do you'll be quite some distance behind in the queue (i.e. behind other guys who swiped right on her before you did).

The AVERAGE match rate on tinder is 1/115: https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a. So if your batting average is higher than 1/115, you're probably above average in looks.

Location is hugely important. If you're white, switch to Thailand, Vietnam or the Philippines and you'll probably get a lot more matches. Same for Latin America. I'm ugly as shit, 4/10 PSL. I have a respectable match rate in SEA (around 4-6/100, which as already said is around 5-7x the average match rate) and got plenty of mileage out of Tinder when I was there. I get ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL back in the west. Zero matches in 2 years, although admittedly for the last year I just kinda gave up and never used it. In Russia I got like 1/250 matches, so below average but still something. Just play around with locations a bit and see.

Keep in mind it takes a LONG time for your results to converge if you want an idea of your 'rating'. 100 swipes is just lol - remember the average match rate is 1/115. You could easily get 0 matches while being average, or you could get 3 or 4. You need a big sample of AT LEAST 3,000 swipes before you can start having an idea of where you stand.

No one, not even Chad is getting 50 matches in 100. I suspect the Chaddest of Chads, a proper 10/10, would max out at around 20/100 - simply because the algorithm won't always show him to the girls, when it does he'll still often be well behind in the queue so the girl won't see him until weeks later, and because even Chad gets rejected sometimes.
 
itsOVER said:
Lol at 50 matches in 100 = 5/10. Even a top tier gigachad wouldn't get that many because of how the algorithm works.

Just because you swipe right on a girl doesn't mean you appear in her stack (i.e. the cards she sees when she is swiping). Infact, given guys swipe right a LOT more than girls, you probably won't be appearing in that stack, and if you do you'll be quite some distance behind in the queue (i.e. behind other guys who swiped right on her before you did).

The AVERAGE match rate on tinder is 1/115: https://medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a. So if your batting average is higher than 1/115, you're probably above average in looks.

Location is hugely important. If you're white, switch to Thailand, Vietnam or the Philippines and you'll probably get a lot more matches. Same for Latin America. I'm ugly as shit, 4/10 PSL. I have a respectable match rate in SEA (around 4-6/100, which as already said is around 5-7x the average match rate) and got plenty of mileage out of Tinder when I was there. I get ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL back in the west. Zero matches in 2 years, although admittedly for the last year I just kinda gave up and never used it. In Russia I got like 1/250 matches, so below average but still something. Just play around with locations a bit and see.

Keep in mind it takes a LONG time for your results to converge if you want an idea of your 'rating'. 100 swipes is just lol - remember the average match rate is 1/115. You could easily get 0 matches while being average, or you could get 3 or 4. You need a big sample of AT LEAST 3,000 swipes before you can start having an idea of where you stand.



No one, not even Chad is getting 50 matches in 100. I suspect the Chaddest of Chads, a proper 10/10, would max out at around 20/100 - simply because the algorithm won't always show him to the girls, when it does he'll still often be well behind in the queue so the girl won't see him until weeks later, and because even Chad gets rejected sometimes.

this
 
If you don't get matces you are SUBHUMAN although the way tinder is designed anything sub 8 can be considered subhuman. Rope anyone?
 
Sparky said:
I’m a fellow UKcel (though I don’t live near London) so I know as well as you do that the UK is hypergamous af

Try EE or Asia.

I'm not white so that would not work out for me.
 
For guys I would say having 30-40/100 matches would be GIGA chad tier.

Having 5-6/100 means you are top tier
Having 1-2/100 means you are GL.
1/200 means average
 
FACEandLMS said:
I used "cheating" apps to mass-swipe 60,000 women.

LMFAO. 0 matches.

Call me a fakecel.

I find it hard to believe. I think something went wrong in your mass swiping.

I mean, out of 60,000 at least a few would match by mistake.
 
AngelOfDisease said:
FACEandLMS said:
I used "cheating" apps to mass-swipe 60,000 women.
LMFAO. 0 matches.
Call me a fakecel.
I find it hard to believe. I think something went wrong in your mass swiping.
I mean, out of 60,000 at least a few would match by mistake.

Or maybe I'm just sub3 lol
 
If you just right swipe on everything (i.e. like the 60k auto swipe dude probably did), the tinder algorithm lowers your ELO score by a massive amount and essentially you stop appearing in the stacks of any girls. Kinda like a stealth ban.

The optimum is to swipe right on 50-80% of girls. Of course, if you're ugly as fuck, you could likely get no matches anyway, but swiping 100% right gets you flagged as a bot pretty quick.
 
FACEandLMS said:
Or maybe I'm just sub3 lol

I really do not think none of them would click/swipe by mistake.
 
Just lol at putting your own subhumanity on display for the world to see, and getting either 0 matches or matches with bots.
 
I can't put myself through that.
 
Yeah. Tinder and smartphones have changed things. Even if you're not on tinder, most women are. Even the women who are in relationships are on tinder. They are all on Facebook. They are all posting selfies on Facebook and Instagram, getting hundreds of likes and getting chatted up by random blokes. I have to wonder. How many people on here even remember life before social media? I know we have a lot of youngercels. You would probably have to have been born before 1990 to have a reasonable memory of life before all this shit.

Tinder pretty much is life now. Its over.
 
Other than one bitch that unmatched me quick, probably because it swiped right on me by mistake, I'm at a grand total of 0 Tinder matches.
 
itsOVER said:
If you just right swipe on everything (i.e. like the 60k auto swipe dude probably did), the tinder algorithm lowers your ELO score by a massive amount and essentially you stop appearing in the stacks of any girls. Kinda like a stealth ban.

The optimum is to swipe right on 50-80% of girls. Of course, if you're ugly as fuck, you could likely get no matches anyway, but swiping 100% right gets you flagged as a bot pretty quick.

Unfortunately the first time I used tinder I had no clue of this so I was most likely marked as a bot and had my profile hidden. Since then I've created a new profile and deleted multiple times. But I get the suspicion that it recognizes I.P. addresses and permanently flags them or something. My recent account is from a new phone number even, but I use my house wifi. I've tried keeping my swipe number under 100 and breaking my swipes up in to 20 swipe intervals and only swiping right on 66-75% of women. But still I get nothing. So either, a) My profile is hidden still and flagged since it's registered from an I.P. address that may be flagged, b) I'm just ugly as fuck and tinder is reminding of that, or c) All of the above.
 
QuantumDummy said:
How many people on here even remember life before social media?

Fuck man I do, I remember passing notes to girls in class to only get rejected or llaughed at.
Some girls would keep the notes/love letters I would leave in their lockers. Even though their friends would laugh at them for thinking it was cute what I was doing they kept it.
I wonder if they didn't have such shitty friends would they have given me a chance?

These days you can pour your fucking heart out & she'll leave you on "read".
 
The coping here is hilarious

Tinder may punish you somewhat for swiping a lot (and this is not proven btw), but not to the extent you won’t get matches

You guys are just ugly, lol
 
Used Tinder for 2 months. Only matched up with a 15 fattie women between 3-5. Complete waste of time man.
 
DanTheDominator said:
Used Tinder for 2 months. Only matched up with a 15 fattie women between 3-5. Complete waste of time man.

15 in 2 months is 15 more than I got in a year so you must mog the fuck out of me.

Assuming you weren't doing 5k swipes a day or something ridiculous of course.

None of us will ever get Stacy's though.
 
itsOVER said:
15 in 2 months is 15 more than I got in a year so you must mog the fuck out of me.

Assuming you weren't doing 5k swipes a day or something ridiculous of course.

None of us will ever get Stacy's though.

They never reply back to my first message tho so I just see them as accidental swipes.
 
DanTheDominator said:
They never reply back to my first message tho so I just see them as accidental swipes.

I found that when I passported my Tinder to Russia. I'd get the occasional match, but rarely would they actually reply. Tbf maybe some didn't speak English, but still.

The only place on Earth I've found Tinder useful is in South East Asia, honestly. And I've done a fair bit of research on this - I've passported to major cities all around the world using tinder plus and looked at my results. SEA countries are the only places I get consistent matches.

Western Europe is absolutely fucking dead. Eastern Europe isn't much better.
 
itsOVER said:
I found that when I passported my Tinder to Russia. I'd get the occasional match, but rarely would they actually reply. Tbf maybe some didn't speak English, but still.

The only place on Earth I've found Tinder useful is in South East Asia, honestly. And I've done a fair bit of research on this - I've passported to major cities all around the world using tinder plus and looked at my results. SEA countries are the only places I get consistent matches.

Western Europe is absolutely fucking dead. Eastern Europe isn't much better.

When I used meet me and Snout I got way more hits from Asian chickens from Vietnam and such. Sadly they live so fucken fat away. Western women are a waste of time in my eyes, self entitled cunts.
 
DanTheDominator said:
When I used meet me and Snout I got way more hits from Asian chickens from Vietnam and such. Sadly they live so fucken fat away. Western women are a waste of time in my eyes, self entitled cunts.

Amen to that, I seriously fucked up moving back to UK.

Need to rope.
 
itsOVER said:
Amen to that, I seriously fucked up moving back to UK.

Need to rope.

Can't you move back?
 
DanTheDominator said:
Can't you move back?

If I could do you think I'd be wasting my life posting on here and lookism all day?
 
itsOVER said:
If I could do you think I'd be wasting my life posting on here and lookism all day?

True... Sucks how there is little to no support groups for people like us out tbere. Go to a psychologist and they will send you to a mental institution. Fuck this society.
 
DanTheDominator said:
True... Sucks how there is little to no support groups for people like us out tbere. Go to a psychologist and they will send you to a mental institution. Fuck this society.

Yep, it's over. Never got any sex from western women when I looked significantly better than I do now. So it's even more over than it used to be, and it was already over back then anyway.

The annoying thing is the cuck mentality has even infiltrated here, with loads of so-called cels talking about game, personality, going to the gym etc.

FACE and HEIGHT.
 
itsOVER said:
If I could do you think I'd be wasting my life posting on here and lookism all day?

stop posting there and you will be respected by Al-Muhaysini
 
itsOVER said:
Yep, it's over. Never got any sex from western women when I looked significantly better than I do now. So it's even more over than it used to be, and it was already over back then anyway.

The annoying thing is the cuck mentality has even infiltrated here, with loads of so-called cels talking about game, personality, going to the gym etc.

FACE and HEIGHT.

Its all business to them. Sell you a false dream.. join my course to get women etc. I just give up on it and accept the fact that I will die a virgin..
 
DanTheDominator said:
Its all business to them. Sell you a false dream.. join my course to get women etc. I just give up on it and accept the fact that I will die a virgin..

Yeah it seems like some have bought into it on this forum though. It's a shame that TRP type rubbish is allowed here.

Face. And. Height.
 
Oh hey I got sticked
 
This is valid just if you uses paid tinder.

Free tinder doesnt let you get too much matches now even if you are 7+
 

Similar threads

SociallyStupid
Replies
11
Views
275
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
G
Replies
10
Views
292
german_suicide9
G
Limitcel
Replies
4
Views
217
Tacomonkey
Tacomonkey
S
Replies
40
Views
813
DefeatedIncel
DefeatedIncel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top