Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Tinder destroyed the planet

What you're saying is chads don't have reasonable standards because though they can settle with a stacy, they choose to fuck everything in sight even if they're sub4.

JFL what kind of BS logic is this, that's like arguing someone who would only eat at 5 star restaurants and someone who would eat from a trash can and up, both have unreasonable standards, your argument is complete BS and you are trying to warp the definition of "unreasonable" in manner that doesn't make sense, you are conflating a "lack of self control" with "unreasonable", its not the same thing, they are two completely separate things, you are really grasping for straws with this one.
 
Tinder may well be the deathblow to Western civilisation, but the rot was well and truly set in even before MySpace and the smartphone. In fact, I strongly suspect that Bill Gates, by bringing user-friendly, GUI-based computing to the masses, is the actual Antichrist incarnate.
 
The roastie revolution destroyed the world
 
Incels in their mid to late 20 should get a badge. 2012 was brutal: hypergamy exploded, feminism and the left took over everything, blue pills everywhere and the black pill was a well kept secret.

We survived '12 when we were at our most vulnerable point: starting out in life and being as horny as dogs.
 
Before the Internet: 4/10 foid had to settle for 4/10 male looksmatch

Before Tinder: 4/10 foid had to "settle" for 6/10 high-tier normie

After Tinder: 4/10 foid can get unlimited supply of 9/10 Chads

Pretty much this.
 
JFL what kind of BS logic is this, that's like arguing someone who would only eat at 5 star restaurants and someone who would eat from a trash can and up, both have unreasonable standards, your argument is complete BS and you are trying to warp the definition of "unreasonable" in manner that doesn't make sense, you are conflating a "lack of self control" with "unreasonable", its not the same thing, they are two completely separate things, you are really grasping for straws with this one.
Controlling chad's lack of self control is just as important as controling foid's unreasonable standards. They both need each other to work.
 
Before the Internet: 4/10 foid had to settle for 4/10 male looksmatch

Before Tinder: 4/10 foid had to "settle" for 6/10 high-tier normie

After Tinder: 4/10 foid can get unlimited supply of 9/10 Chads
Sticky this^
 
Controlling chad's lack of self control is just as important as controling foid's unreasonable standards. They both need each other to work.

No they don't

If we stop Chad's lack of self control and women are throwing themselves at him then he isn't going out of his way chasing after women now is he, so can you really call that a lack of self control?, but if we control women's unreasonable standards and restricted them to dating looksmatches then Chad would basically have to rape if we left his uncontrollable standards to run rampant, because no women would be throwing themselves at him, he'd have to seek out and force himself on these women. At the end of the day women have to "allow entry", they have the last say else its rape, that's why Chad's lack of self control is a non-factor, because its not a co-dependency, its one sided, both are not dependent on eachother, Chads lack of self control is dependent on women's unreasonable standards, it doesn't go both ways, its a one way street, without women's say so and permission, Chads lack of self control doesn't mean shit unless he's willing to rape.

Eg.
1. Chad (no control) + Women (reasonable) = Chad will have to rape since these women are with their looksmatches
2. Chad (no control) + Women (unreasonable) = Women fuck Chad willingly
3. Chad (control) + Women (reasonable) = No different than the #1 because women have the final say
4. Chad (control) + Women (unreasonable) = Chad will obviously fuck women throwing themselves at him

The determining factor is always women
 
Last edited:
Tinder is just as corrupt as feminism. Something must be done.
 
No they don't

If we stop Chad's lack of self control and women are throwing themselves at him then he isn't going out of his way chasing after women now is he, so can you really call that a lack of self control?, but if we control women's unreasonable standards and restricted them to dating looksmatches then Chad would basically have to rape if we left his uncontrollable standards to run rampant, because no women would be throwing themselves at him, he'd have to seek out and force himself on these women. At the end of the day women have to "allow entry", they have the last say else its rape, that's why Chad's lack of self control is a non-factor, because its not a co-dependency, its one sided, both are not dependent on eachother, Chads lack of self control is dependent on women's unreasonable standards, it doesn't go both ways, its a one way street, without women's say so and permission, Chads lack of self control doesn't mean shit unless he's willing to rape.

Eg.
1. Chad (no control) + Women (reasonable) = Chad will have to rape since these women are with their looksmatches
2. Chad (no control) + Women (unreasonable) = Women fuck Chad willingly
3. Chad (control) + Women (reasonable) = No different than the #1 because women have the final say
4. Chad (control) + Women (unreasonable) = Chad will obviously fuck women throwing themselves at him

The determining factor is always women
Except Chad would get his needs met if we gave him his looksmatched wife? So no problem with Chad.
 
It's the work of Satan, boys
Dfdfdf
 
Tinder would have made no difference for me if it was here or gone.
 
No they don't

If we stop Chad's lack of self control and women are throwing themselves at him then he isn't going out of his way chasing after women now is he, so can you really call that a lack of self control?, but if we control women's unreasonable standards and restricted them to dating looksmatches then Chad would basically have to rape if we left his uncontrollable standards to run rampant, because no women would be throwing themselves at him, he'd have to seek out and force himself on these women. At the end of the day women have to "allow entry", they have the last say else its rape, that's why Chad's lack of self control is a non-factor, because its not a co-dependency, its one sided, both are not dependent on eachother, Chads lack of self control is dependent on women's unreasonable standards, it doesn't go both ways, its a one way street, without women's say so and permission, Chads lack of self control doesn't mean shit unless he's willing to rape.

Eg.
1. Chad (no control) + Women (reasonable) = Chad will have to rape since these women are with their looksmatches
2. Chad (no control) + Women (unreasonable) = Women fuck Chad willingly
3. Chad (control) + Women (reasonable) = No different than the #1 because women have the final say
4. Chad (control) + Women (unreasonable) = Chad will obviously fuck women throwing themselves at him

The determining factor is always women
Jfl at those who say women are less sexual than men. They are willing to collapse society just so they can get chad dick. I believe the best way to "control" women is to remove the cucked laws and take away the taxes they get from the state, then let them fend for themselves like real feminists. Young girls will see the consequences of old used sluts not being respected or allowed to have children, and men only having families with girls who are virgins. The way to cut women off like this is by blackpilling men and giving them access to high quality sexbots, male birth control, and surrogacy or artificial wombs.
 
Last edited:
Dude, if tinder an online dating didn't exist, femasytes would just force the government to create a registry of "passing" and "failing" men who would be photographed, measured, and medically analyzed in every possible way to create a public genetic hierarchical catalog of males in which eighty percent are either reduced to normie cucks listed as Low Quality in the catalog or Incels excluded from the catalog all together. Tinder is just the famasytes in the private sector doing what they want to do in the public sector. Women today are basically saying "in order to reduce the population and improve human genetics for a better a tomorrow, we will only have sex with Chads and sacrifice the lives of the majority of men today."
 
I agree. The only thing Tinder did was to blackpill more people.
this, dating apps/sites are the tools we don't deserve but needed it to unmask foids
 
Should I make fake tinder acc?
 
Women today are basically saying "in order to reduce the population and improve human genetics for a better a tomorrow, we will only have sex with Chads and sacrifice the lives of the majority of men today."
Most foids are ugly, so even if they only fuck chads incels will still be made.
 
Dude, if tinder an online dating didn't exist, femasytes would just force the government to create a registry of "passing" and "failing" men who would be photographed, measured, and medically analyzed in every possible way to create a public genetic hierarchical catalog of males in which eighty percent are either reduced to normie cucks listed as Low Quality in the catalog or Incels excluded from the catalog all together. Tinder is just the famasytes in the private sector doing what they want to do in the public sector. Women today are basically saying "in order to reduce the population and improve human genetics for a better a tomorrow, we will only have sex with Chads and sacrifice the lives of the majority of men today."

Yep. Sperm banks with donor-profiles have existed for a long time. Sterile and non-virile men in a "relationship" always had to accept donor sperm for their offspring. Women still want high-value donor sperm, and Chad is right there on Tinder when she wants him.
 
Most foids are ugly, so even if they only fuck chads incels will still be made.
Exactly, which is why femoids in 2019 are major anime super villains. Extreme hypocrites with ambitions that can cause more suffering than the world has ever seen and possibly wipe out our species.
 
Exactly, which is why femoids in 2019 are major anime super villains. Extreme hypocrites with ambitions that can cause more suffering than the world has ever seen and possibly wipe out our species.
But somehow we're the bad guys for saying "holes are evil." Crazy world we're living in.
 
We are already living in a semi-collapse situation friend.
I’d agree with you if the unwashed masses posessed some pride and dignity, or a spine, or at the very least critical thinking abilities
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Discussion Tinder CEO
Replies
22
Views
792
yeetbender.koala
yeetbender.koala
Nordicel94
Replies
11
Views
186
Nordicel94
Nordicel94
Gendocel
Replies
20
Views
357
Sonicfancel
Sonicfancel
K
Replies
3
Views
141
VPSCel
VPSCel
SuperKanga.Belgrade
Replies
47
Views
496
FrozenInsomnia
FrozenInsomnia

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top