wasted12years
Luminary
★★★★★
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2018
- Posts
- 11,767
- Online time
- 1d 18h
Do you agree or disagree?
This is my favourite:Bros political philosophy was "Millions must die"
Gemini says:
The answer is that there is no physical "weight limit" for the human population because we are not adding new mass to the planet.
Here is a breakdown of why, from a strictly physics-based perspective:
1. Conservation of Mass
- Humans are part of Earth: Every person is made of atoms (carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, etc.) that were already present on Earth, originally consumed through food, water, and air. When the population increases, you are simply rearranging and converting mass already within the Earth system, not adding external mass.
- The total mass remains constant: Therefore, the total mass of the Earth + all humans remains effectively the same. This principle also applies to the mass of human-made structures (anthropogenic mass) like buildings, roads, and cars—they are all constructed from materials (rock, metal, oil) already extracted from the Earth's crust.
In conclusion, the Earth's physical structure can easily accommodate any realistically possible number of humans, as we are simply mass rearranged from the planet itself.
His views were certainly unique. A mix of Hitler, Pol Pot, Bin Laden and Kaczynski in one package. He is still niche tho. Even the most extreme environmentalist circles don't really talk about him.
Leftist woke shit or Ted kazcinsky
More like Ted. He's not really that leftist but i disagree with Pentti on his anti-natalist views.Leftist woke shit or Ted kazcinsky
How does he have similar views to Pol Pot? elab.His views were certainly unique. A mix of Hitler, Pol Pot, Bin Laden and Kaczynski in one package. He is still niche tho. Even the most extreme environmentalist circles don't really talk about him.
that violent rejection of modernity and support for autogenocideHow does he have similar views to Pol Pot? elab.





