He attempts to convey psychological phenomenon as a product of biological mechanisms at times, which isn't useless. The actual scientific accuracy of these findings is hard to prove though without the research know-how. He is mainly entertaining the mental faculties and creating productive thinking processes; a lot of his flowcharts assume things that are hard to verify: he talks about dreams fulfilling needs etc. Then he knows the dopamine receptor overloading mechanics, he advocates in his dopamine detoxing that you can basically suffocate the dopamine recept'ors into pure short term greed.
The main thing I dislike about these psychologists is that they seem to ignore the most black pilled ideas are actually innovative in medicine. An example being myopia and poor skull development influencing productivity. And in addition, he doesn't seem to acknowledge cranial defects stemming from aged pelvises, which are less wide in the x-y axis giving birth, causing cranial frontal growth problems.