Based & Blackpilled.
Serious Those of you who can't stop talking about teen love are the same ones who are interested in 13-year-olds
Based & Blackpilled.
Well if you want a serious answer. I play games quite frequently outside of work/hobbies and the most frequently used keys are WASD, I play FPS games and I quite frequently use Numbers 1-2-3 to cycle weapons/killstreaks.
I rarely use the number "8", so following the series of alphabetical characters I typed, the closest number to my "strongest hand" was 1 hence why i typed 18 as a result.
Sure bud, it had nothing to do with the fact that you're indoctrinated to think 18 is the magical number of consent
You asked me "Why did I start with 18?" Not "Why did you pick 18".
It's also the age I'd happily enter a LTR with a foid in an ideal world where they weren't all whores.
Totally agree. It is also mainly the autists who want to fulfil this loli fantasy and I think it has something to do with the fact that an adult NT female will always have one over on an autist mentally - in at least a social capacity - and that creates a catch-22 in the mind of the autists because most of these guys are envisaging a subservient partner when living out their fantasies.
Autists become extremely beta when speaking to females face to face (think ER) An NT female simply cannot be subordinate to an autistic male, I simply cannot imagine what the dynamics of that social relationship would look like, an autist is always at a disadvantage in any face to face social interaction.
That is why they prefer the idea of a young mind to which they can appear as a father figure as it is the only conceivable context in which the dominance fantasy can be maintained. Although autists can be smart in many ways, social interactions with NT women is one of their biggest fears, they would rather play dress up with a little doll with an underdeveloped mental faculty than have to face that fear and face the prospect of having their social impotence exposed at the hands of someone they consider their inferior.
Autists become extremely beta when speaking to females face to face (think ER) An NT female simply cannot be subordinate to an autistic male, I simply cannot imagine what the dynamics of that social relationship would look like, an autist is always at a disadvantage in any face to face social interaction.
That is why they prefer the idea of a young mind to which they can appear as a father figure as it is the only conceivable context in which the dominance fantasy can be maintained. Although autists can be smart in many ways, social interactions with NT women is one of their biggest fears, they would rather play dress up with a little doll with an underdeveloped mental faculty than have to face that fear and face the prospect of having their social impotence exposed at the hands of someone they consider their inferior.
Last edited:
Some look good
Don't you see the problem with this logic?
"A 10-year-old isn't mentally different from a 12-year-old. A 12-year-old isn't mentally different from a 14-year-old. A 14-year-old isn't mentally different from a 16-year-old. A 16-year-old isn't mentally different from an 18-year-old. Therefore, a 10-year-old isn't mentally different from an 18-year-old."
I'm aware that maturity and emotional development isn't clear-cut, but right now, someone's age is the best way to draw the line; and the line has to be drawn somewhere.
This isn't about the "level" of romantic conversation, it's about manipulation.
Last edited:
E
Seriously a 16 years old just isn’t different from a 19 year old. That’s just a fact. Once they’re in their mid teens they’re fully grown
@Napoleon de Geso is the only retard who fucking dwells on this shit.
All you morons who thinks having sex with 13 yr old is going to validate your existence,
massive fucking cope.
No but imagine some of the older users who are 35+ yrs, or 40+ in Napoleon's case.
Imagine this retarded oldcel trying to take your agematched foid for his pleasure, his already wasted and dead end life while you, with more potential gets scrapped and pillaged out of something from your rightful range. Just so that this fucking idiot can attempt to pretend to be chad for his selfish foidish pleasure.
I agree completely
It is true that the U.S. has relatively high age of consent laws and extremely harsh penalties that may actually be counterproductive (e.g. publicly accessible sex offender registries). It is also true that the American criminal justice system (overall, not just in cases surrounding sex crimes) has some serious flaws. In my opinion, this is a consequence of the suburban moral panic surrounding child abductions and "superpredator" career criminals in the 1990s. But that is a discussion for another day.
I am not here to argue where the law should draw the line. I am just here to argue that the line should exist, and that any incel who wants a far younger partner who they think is "innocent" and "pure" is misguided at best and dangerous at worst.
Youthfulness and fertility are attractive traits (both genders find it attractive) and younger foids have these traits higher on average, that's it
But yeah I agree, people who think that underage femoids are "innocent" and "pure" are utterly bluepilled and delusional about this
But yeah I agree, people who think that underage femoids are "innocent" and "pure" are utterly bluepilled and delusional about this
I've already mentioned in my post that if sexual inexperience is what you seek in a partner, you aren't as morally questionable as someone who is looking for emotional/social inexperience.
I'm just sitting here asking for a gf meanwhile all of you nigs are talking about wanting a specific type of girl.
Meanwhile my only requirements are don't be (too) fat and be virgin
Meanwhile my only requirements are don't be (too) fat and be virgin
I always considered transageism to be such an outlandish fantasy that it had to be satire.
Age is an arbitrary number for brain and character development. There are 30 year old foids who still act like they are 16. Female maturity is heavily linked to their SMV. Women don't mature until they get too old to pull chad. Then they mature to the "I need to settle down" stage. Once they hit menopause, they change into grandmother type figures and mellow out. If foids never aged, they would never grow up.
I don't see why a 25-year-old on this forum would prefer a 13-year-old foid over a 23-year-old foid, though. I can understand, from an evolutionary standpoint, why men are attracted to cues of youthfulness -- but men also look for cues of sexual maturity (i.e. adult frame, hip-to-waist ratio, physical fitness, breast development), and if you are attracted to the former but not the latter, it is a biological malfunction.
Exactly.
As I've already mentioned this is not a dig at teenagecels, I'm referring to the older incels on this forum.
Same. I would take a chaste woman in her late-20s or even 30s over a slut in her late-teens any day.
This is what I am trying to avoid more than anything:
Sexdolls may not be 100% realistic yet but at least they're clean. Can't say the same about 99.9999999% of modern women of legal age.
I can't tell if this is real, why the fuck would someone save a condom and not toss it? Fucking disgusting.
How do you know?
I don't see why this is the case.
Do you also think we should allow 12-year-olds to vote, drink, smoke, gamble, drive, and join the military?
More often than not, when the relationship goes sour, the NT female assumes the abusive role.
There is something to be said about how toxic femininity contributes to a culture where men are expected to assume a dominant role -- not just in relationships but in almost every social context -- and this, of course, places physically inferior and/or socially impotent men (through no fault of their own) at a disadvantage.
I would argue that the dominance aspect is true for NT pedocels as well -- someone as wealthy and connected as Epstein could easily maintain a dominant role with an adult femoid, but I suppose over time that wasn't big enough of a power trip.
Last edited:
I know its the daily fail - but there are some YouTube videos of this creep as well.
Canadian man leaves family to live as a transgender six-year-old girl
Stefonknee Wolscht, 52, lived as Paul with his wife until she realized she was transgender and was shunned by her family. She now lives with an adoptive family as a six-year-old girl.
Ngl oldfags butting in on my agematch does piss me off. I’m constantly trying to ascend with snapchat and keep losing because some 20+ college age chad just sends one message and they fuck on the same day jfl
All of which most girls already have in their early teens nowadays.
marrying used hole is most cucked thing man can do
sameSame. I would take a chaste woman in her late-20s or even 30s over a slut in her late-teens any day.
This is what I am trying to avoid more than anything:
Sexdolls may not be 100% realistic yet but at least they're clean. Can't say the same about 99.9999999% of modern women of legal age.
Bro this video is really cool and they dance a lot...
if it were 3 korean guys they would have millions of views...
You say that as if most users on the forum take your position on morality, but by your standard, the vast majority of us are egoists. Most claims on this forum are based on some conception of morality.
When someone says, "I deserve to ascend as much as Chad does; I deserve my looksmatch", that is a moral claim -- he is arguing that individuals deserve "fair equality of opportunity of ascension".
When someone says, "I deserve the right to free speech, including the right to express inflammatory speech without censorship by the state or even social media platforms," that is a moral claim -- he is arguing that by nature of being a free-thinking individual you deserve dignity and associated civil liberties.
When someone says, "I deserve the right to visit a sex worker; to engage in a mutually consensual commercial transaction with a sex worker, without excessive interference by the state," that is a moral claim -- he is arguing that as a free-willed individual, it is immoral for the state to restrict his economic freedoms based on the (possibly religious) value judgment of a particular official.
Like it or not, the rejection of "conventional morality" is a form of morality in and of itself, our forum members regularly propound unconventional normative claims and value judgments, yet you only proffer the "moral scepticism" perspective when the agenda suits yours.
Again, I'm not arguing that emotional development is clear-cut, I'm just saying the line has to be drawn.
This, quite frankly, isn't true at all. Brain and emotional development, social awareness, etc does not stop at 15.
Last edited:
Not even by my standard, the majority of you are in fact egoists
I agree, that's why most claims on this forum are false or logically flawed, as they are rooted in a false premise
You really need to look at my signature, people claiming they deserve things is something I hate, nobody deserves anything, and its the concept of deserving that is exactly why we have inequality that is so easily accepted in this world, because everyone goes around telling themselves that its alright that they deprive others of something and keep excess for themselves, because "I deserve it"
"Like it or not, atheism is a form of religion in and of itself"
"Like it or not, veganism is a form of carnivorism in and of itself"
I'm sorry no, that's not how it works
If by "when the agenda suits yours" you mean "all the time", I agree, because I'm always against any argument made based on morality, you either assert something based on logic or your don't assert it at all
For women in probably does
Last edited:
I agree with almost everything except for this:
There are some exceptions, I am not usually attracted to ''lolis'' but if I find a truly intelligent and well cultured 13/14yo I would take her over an intellectually average grown woman every time. How much you have to offer depends more on your personality than your age, that's why some highly intelligent kids have adult friends. Of course, you were probably generalizing so my comment wasn't really necessary but I still wanted to point it out.
T
never did anyone think this about high school aged whores if they have a working brain
There’s nothing wrong with being attracted to a 13 year old. That is around the age they begin to be fit for reproduction. And so from a purely evolutionary standpoint at least it makes sense
if they had a working brain, yeah. I don't think the guys posting on here daily about "cultured lady loli waifus of culture" meet that criteria tbh
What if you also like sassy lolis?
I still can't tell how many of them are simply fucking around
As a general rule of thumb.
If(age > 20 && weeb.avi == true){
cout << "They're being serious";
}
Else{
cout << "They're joking";
}
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
