
Robtical
Had it with these cucks!
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2018
- Posts
- 33,573
Holes are more hypergamous these days because they have so many options they can only be attracted to walking "works of art" and not their looksmatches. Before tinder and feminism foids had no problem fucking ugly men. Men used to have more smv before feminism because there were a lot less cucked laws and foids who wasted their youth being whores got slut shamed.This leads me to the SMP. Is the “disparity” in it really about hypergamy/polygyny? Are women really not that attracted to their “equals” because they have sky high standards, or do their ‘equals’ just not have innately attractive feats? And for men. Are men really happy to dive below their league because their sex drives “allow” them to be attracted to most women, or is it just that most women have innately attractive features?
By the way, while I believe this is the case for average women/men, I believe that attractive men are FAR more appealing than attractive women. Angular features (signaling a healthy amount of T), tall height, masculine physique (gym or no gym), hooded eyes, thick brows, gorgeous deep voices... these men can be compared to demi-gods. Maybe it’s their rarity, maybe they just really do look like works of art, no idea.