This tweet pisses me off : "Choose a 6/10 with a good personality over a 9/10 with a bad personality"... I cant even get 1/10s with bad personality

[ZoomerAmerican]

This literally only applies to Giga-Chads, like 5% of men. The vast majority of us don't even have the option of deciding between a 9/10 vs a 6/10 because most of us struggle to even get 3/10s to give us attention

I'll never have the issue of trying to pick between a 9/10 with a bad personality vs a 6/10 with a good personality because even 1/10s with bad personality reject me.

This is what I call first world problems. This issue is far out of realm for me, it's like asking me do I prefer a mansion in NYC or Long Island? I'm not even remotely close to affording either, as I cant even afford a shithole apartment in the worst part of NY.

Question : Does the tweet apply to any man outside of the Top 5%? Most men cant even get 5/10s to give them a time of day. Are you trying to tell men are juggling between 9/10s and 6/10s?

 

[Leon98]

Question : Does the tweet apply to any man outside of the Top 5%? Most men cant even get 5/10s to give them a time of day. Are you trying to tell men are juggling between 9/10s and 6/10s?

 

[Enigmaz]

It only applies to Chad. The key word this guy says is, 'A 6/10 foid who loves you'. Only htns and up can experience true love anyway. Foid's subconsciously always desire Chad even in relationships with normfaggots.

Besides, 6/10 and 9/10 foids are always hypergamied all the way up to mate with Chad.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

For 90%+ of men, "love" is something that they have to earn with whatever woman they are desperately pursuing, with no chance of backing out if she turns out to be abusive, crazy, not who she seemed to be, etc., as nine out of 10 men are simply so hopelessly unwanted that whatever woman seems like she'd give you a tiny chance just instantly becomes "the one." Having a possibility to choose in general is utterly unimaginable to guys like us who are on the exact opposite end of the distribution from guys like the one who posted that tweet, and that's not even talking about choosing between two above-average attractive women who just differ on the level of said above-average attractiveness.

This is what I call first world problems. This issue is far out of realm for me, it's like asking me do I prefer a mansion in NYC or Long Island? I'm not even remotely close to affording either, as I cant even afford a shithole apartment in the worst part of NY.

Question : Does the tweet apply to any man outside of the Top 5%? Most men cant even get 5/10s to give them a time of day. Are you trying to tell men are juggling between 9/10s and 6/10s?