Deleted member 2047
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2017
- Posts
- 3,396
Let's say that an incel announces he's going to ER. Theres no way he can be stopped, arrested, talked out of it, etc UNLESS a female has sex with him once.
100% chance dozens will die if that incel doesn't get laid. It it morally wrong to not fuck him?
Society would obviously answer that this is just hostage taking, extortion, but let's put it a different way.
Let's say that men are stranded on a boat with one woman. It's fairly well known you can survive without salt, but your body will crave it to the point of torturing you. The woman has control of all the food. She gives guy #1 salty food so he can stay sane because hes 6 feet tall. She does the same for guy #2 because he has a square jaw. She refuses to give it to guy number 3, instead she gives him lettuce. She continues to do this until he begins to snap, and threatens to kill the other men in rage. Is she a bad person for not giving him the same thing (that his human brain craves) that she gave the other men with little to no hesistation? Or is he entitled?
100% chance dozens will die if that incel doesn't get laid. It it morally wrong to not fuck him?
Society would obviously answer that this is just hostage taking, extortion, but let's put it a different way.
Let's say that men are stranded on a boat with one woman. It's fairly well known you can survive without salt, but your body will crave it to the point of torturing you. The woman has control of all the food. She gives guy #1 salty food so he can stay sane because hes 6 feet tall. She does the same for guy #2 because he has a square jaw. She refuses to give it to guy number 3, instead she gives him lettuce. She continues to do this until he begins to snap, and threatens to kill the other men in rage. Is she a bad person for not giving him the same thing (that his human brain craves) that she gave the other men with little to no hesistation? Or is he entitled?