Before anyone calls me a schizo, here are my main points.
ER was High likely a real person, but I suspect that this attack ((somewhat)), was enabled by ((them)), for their own reasons.
>His grandfather was a British military photographer who took pictures of one of the "concentration camps". If 6 million Jews was an exaggeration and a lie, then what are the odds that other pictures are also somewhat staged or exaggerated to push their own agendas?
>His father was part of the hollyweird and had connections to it, including actors
>Just coincidentally, they crowned the rich,Hollywood connected guy as the "king of all incels" and started labeling them all as terrorists.
>When you enter Marc Lèpine,Alek minassian or Chris Harper, there's barely any videos on them, despite
1. Marc being ER's inspiration
2.Both Alek and Chris having bigger and more damaging kill counts than him
>But there's somehow millions of essays and videos about ER, even though his attack was in reality nothing special
>There's a fucking actor page for ER (just pointing it out for fun)
My crazy theory?
Isla Vista massacre, although real, was purposefully enabled by the government to push their own agendas and label incels as terrorists and excuse and tighten the femicide laws/narrative.
Er was the perfect puppet because he practically "dismantles" every Incel argument in normies eyes :
>It's all about looks!
"Well because ER was "good looking", so it's personality which was the issue."
>It's height!
"Well he was 5'9 and saw guys shorter than him slay. So what's your excuse?!"
>It was his misogyny/autism
"Yeah and he needed more therapy!! And pills too!!"
All of these movements started for a reason, just like with columbine shit. There's clearly an ulterior motive. Somehow, all of the most popular shootings/killings were somewhat with dubious authenticity.
But who knows? Maybe I'm just crazy.
ER was High likely a real person, but I suspect that this attack ((somewhat)), was enabled by ((them)), for their own reasons.
>His grandfather was a British military photographer who took pictures of one of the "concentration camps". If 6 million Jews was an exaggeration and a lie, then what are the odds that other pictures are also somewhat staged or exaggerated to push their own agendas?
>His father was part of the hollyweird and had connections to it, including actors
>Just coincidentally, they crowned the rich,Hollywood connected guy as the "king of all incels" and started labeling them all as terrorists.
>When you enter Marc Lèpine,Alek minassian or Chris Harper, there's barely any videos on them, despite
1. Marc being ER's inspiration
2.Both Alek and Chris having bigger and more damaging kill counts than him
>But there's somehow millions of essays and videos about ER, even though his attack was in reality nothing special
>There's a fucking actor page for ER (just pointing it out for fun)
My crazy theory?
Isla Vista massacre, although real, was purposefully enabled by the government to push their own agendas and label incels as terrorists and excuse and tighten the femicide laws/narrative.
Er was the perfect puppet because he practically "dismantles" every Incel argument in normies eyes :
>It's all about looks!
"Well because ER was "good looking", so it's personality which was the issue."
>It's height!
"Well he was 5'9 and saw guys shorter than him slay. So what's your excuse?!"
>It was his misogyny/autism
"Yeah and he needed more therapy!! And pills too!!"
All of these movements started for a reason, just like with columbine shit. There's clearly an ulterior motive. Somehow, all of the most popular shootings/killings were somewhat with dubious authenticity.
But who knows? Maybe I'm just crazy.
Last edited:
