There's too few females

[animucel]

https://www.populationpyramid.net/

“There's someone for everyone”

There's too few females under the age of 40 to be enough for everyone. People will say "There's more women than men", but that's only true for 50+ year old grannies. Biologically speaking, a portion of the male population is just there to work and die with no descendant. If any of you know economics, you know what that means. There's a huge demand for females and the supply is strictly limited. By that sole fact it makes them extremely valuable.

If you want equality in relationships, you need at least twice as many females as males due to the inherent nature of FHOs. Even at 1:1 ratio you'd still be worse off due to the inherent natural pickiness of females that they've developed. However, that will never happen naturally due to an evolutionary principle called Fisher's principle. This sole fact explains perfectly why it is so much easier to get laid as a low-value female, but hard even as an “average”-value male. Females can afford to be picky. It's more evolutionarily advantageous to reproduce with someone of more genetic quality.

 

[St.Tropez]

Tbh it is kinda a minor point. Because at age 30 it is roughly the same. And there are more gays than lesbians.

 

[Virginp0wers2]

Incels can only be wageslaves or LDAR and get NEETBUX. Their is no salvation for us.

 

[animucel]

https://www.populationpyramid.net/

“There's someone for everyone”

There's too few females under the age of 40 to be enough for everyone. People will say "There's more women than men", but that's only true for 50+ year old grannies. Biologically speaking, a portion of the male population is just there to work and die with no descendant. If any of you know economics, you know what that means. There's a huge demand for females and the supply is strictly limited. By that sole fact it makes them extremely valuable.

If you want equality in relationships, you need at least twice as many females as males due to the inherent nature of FHOs. Even at 1:1 ratio you'd still be worse off due to the inherent natural pickiness of females that they've developed. However, that will never happen naturally due to an evolutionary principle called Fisher's principle. This sole fact explains perfectly why it is so much easier to get laid as a low-value female, but hard even as an “average”-value male. Females can afford to be picky. It's more evolutionarily advantageous to reproduce with someone of more genetic quality.

At age 30-34, in the US, there's about 300 000 females missing.

 

[animucel]

Tbh it is kinda a minor point. Because at age 30 it is roughly the same. And there are more gays than lesbians.

At age 30-34, in the US, there's about 300,000 females missing to pair with every male in the same age range.

 

[St.Tropez]

Tbh it is kinda a minor point. Because at age 30 it is roughly the same. And there are more gays than lesbians.

At age 30-34, in the US, there's about 300,000 females missing to pair with every male in the same age range.

Yes but that is nothing in a such a high population country. I doubt it has major effect.

 

[Virginp0wers2]

the male to female ratio is a joke where I live in the uk, all females have a bf / husband no matter how obese they are. Honestly surprising considering how entitled British femoids are.