G
And you cannot prove me wrong. Were if not for the dysgenic processes modern society brings about genetically inferior subhumans such as you and I wouldn't have to suffer since we wouldn't even get to exist.
True.
Totally agree. We need suicide booths too. Darwin will do the rest.
eugenics is a moral and painless solution to inceldom
D
Eugenics is a great idea with no downsides at all.
A perfect society would be a mixture of eugenics, patriarchy, and strict, conservative Christianity.
A perfect society would be a mixture of eugenics, patriarchy, and strict, conservative Christianity.
I'd prefer the annihilation of all life.
MayorOfKekville said:
all heil dr. Mengele
T
Whenever someone brings up "eugenics", and they refuse to associate it with anything other than Hitler/genocide, you know you've got a mental bitch who couldn't think for himself for his autobiography.
We're willing to admit that traits are heritable, like health, strength, intelligence, etc, but as soon as you offer plans to improve such qualities, you're treated like just another Nazi.
Ironically, evolution itself requires nature to practice eugenics on a daily basis, especially in terms of sexuality. Every time a female selects a buff rich Chad over a poor Incel, she's practicing "eugenics".
There's even those conservatives calling the abortion of downs-syndrome fetuses as "genocide". But, given 90% of screened DS fetuses are terminated, most of these conservatives are in fact bold-face liars.
The only problem with eugenics is the ethical questions. And once nations like China don't give a shit about those questions, we WILL resort to eugenics just to be competitive. Normies are fucking idiots.
We're willing to admit that traits are heritable, like health, strength, intelligence, etc, but as soon as you offer plans to improve such qualities, you're treated like just another Nazi.
Ironically, evolution itself requires nature to practice eugenics on a daily basis, especially in terms of sexuality. Every time a female selects a buff rich Chad over a poor Incel, she's practicing "eugenics".
There's even those conservatives calling the abortion of downs-syndrome fetuses as "genocide". But, given 90% of screened DS fetuses are terminated, most of these conservatives are in fact bold-face liars.
The only problem with eugenics is the ethical questions. And once nations like China don't give a shit about those questions, we WILL resort to eugenics just to be competitive. Normies are fucking idiots.
D
Richard Lynn has advocated this, but for intelligence and racialist reasons.
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDkrgVyI5fE&t=2625s[/video]
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDkrgVyI5fE&t=2625s[/video]
i dont think more humans should have to suffer with the incel subhuman problem such as us. Eugenics would solve a lot of this.
TheIncelPill said:
I don't think any intelligent incel would argue against eugenics
I agree, there is nothing wrong with eugenics ethically and it is a good idea on paper.
In practice, however, it is quite difficult for the state to effectively practice eugenics on a large scale
In practice, however, it is quite difficult for the state to effectively practice eugenics on a large scale
shukin said:
idk, it doesn't really appeal to me. Seems like an Incle Tom solution
Kointo said:I'd prefer the annihilation of all life.
Here is a red bastard, fucking kill him.
Götterdämmerung said:
Are you Turkish? Your avi is a Turkish Chad. You know?
Kointo said:I'd prefer the annihilation of all life.
Pretty much this. Just wipe out all life and start with a clean slate.
Cuck-Damage said:
One should sacrifice even his existence to create Ubermensch. But, some plebs can't understand this.
U
This is all good but how do we know which baby ends up as an incel ?
D
TheIncelPill said:
Agreed, the only argument people can mount against it is the Third Reich. This is proof they have no real argument because all they can do is immediately engage in Godwin's law. But the Third Reich also gave universal health care, subsidized vacations, and promoted some degree of environmentalism. Because Hitler supported thee polices does not mean we should or should not deny them. Soft eugenics and strict immigration policies would be good for the United States.
Kointo said:
Old eugenics are inefficient and primitive, subhuman genes are already in the genoma map of even the Chaddiest Chad.
What we need is New eugenics(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_eugenics) or much better, Socialist eugenics, the state have the duty of end the suffering of future subhumans forever.
What we need is New eugenics(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_eugenics) or much better, Socialist eugenics, the state have the duty of end the suffering of future subhumans forever.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
