(A talking point before I start arguing my view)
Being homosexual occurs in nature. Whether it’s right or not is someone else’s moral perspective, but it does exist. I just believe that a large majority of so-called “gay men” still feel attraction to the opposite gender and that lesbians cannot exist at all.
It’s also important to take into consideration that people apart of the lgbtq community report higher abuse rates. About 83% of lesbian, gay and queer individuals report going through emotional and sexual abuse. Sexual abuse is the main denominator.
(Sources: https://news.vumc.org/2022/02/24/st...traight-people-worse-mental-health-as-adults/)
It’s also noted that about 20-45% of homosexual women and men reported being molested as children. They have higher sexual abuse rates compared to heterosexual individuals.
Sources: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9127231/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(This also isn’t proof to my original argument, it’s just observation that being homosexual is largely not a phenomenon that just happens out of the blue and there is usually a reason that someone prefers the same sex.)
Moving on…
The logic behind the reason why lesbians cannot exist is simply due to the fact that women cannot survive in nature without a man. That man, being Chad.
Women are all Chad bots (water) and there is absolutely no exceptions. First of all, we can acknowledge that being homosexual itself is outside of the biological norm. Heterosexual attraction is the biological norm because it is the only type of sexual attraction that directly results in reproduction. Anyways, there is no way in nature that a woman can be lesbian because of SURVIVAL. Why lesbians cannot exist is simply due to the fact that women cannot survive in nature without a man. That man, being Chad.
Women are the ones who are the most vulnerable in nature, there is no means for them to be independent, because they’d die off. They need to be dependant on a man and that man is Chad. They are hypergamous beings and have more rigid expectations because they need to maximize their survival to even get it close to a man’s. Although this is the modern world that women now have a technically better chance to live on their own in, this changes nothing because we are still animals at our core and parts of our brain have not evolved since the prehistoric times. We haven’t evolved to this modern world. There’s a reason women prefer violent guys because they hogged all the resources, even tho it would go against traits like parental investment that women were supposedly evolved to have. If we also took every single one of women’s rights away, they couldn’t do anything about it because in the end it’s about whose physically superior, they can’t fight or do anything to win over us.
Although this is water from a biological and evolutionary perspective, Chad is above ALL. This includes Stacy which is just a foid apart of his pool that he chooses from. All women regardless of how they look instinctively need Chad because they are completely dependant on him. Men on the other hand, are not dependant on anyone in nature they are the beings that women rely on. For this phenomenon of being homosexual existing, it doesn’t make sense for it to exist in women. Reproduction and survival go hand in hand, survival is also what fuels reproduction. If we don’t have means for survival, then the entire population would just die out. But if we simply have homosexual individuals the population would just decline. People would still be having kids. Remember that being homosexual will always be the minority in any species and it will always stay that way evolutionarily.
Women look at Chad and feel a sense of urgency and need for him, Gay men do not look at Stacy with an urgency and need for her. Women who claim they are “lesbian” act differently when Chad arrives, and suddenly she’s the one competing for him in a large pool of women.
Being homosexual occurs in nature. Whether it’s right or not is someone else’s moral perspective, but it does exist. I just believe that a large majority of so-called “gay men” still feel attraction to the opposite gender and that lesbians cannot exist at all.
It’s also important to take into consideration that people apart of the lgbtq community report higher abuse rates. About 83% of lesbian, gay and queer individuals report going through emotional and sexual abuse. Sexual abuse is the main denominator.
(Sources: https://news.vumc.org/2022/02/24/st...traight-people-worse-mental-health-as-adults/)
It’s also noted that about 20-45% of homosexual women and men reported being molested as children. They have higher sexual abuse rates compared to heterosexual individuals.
Sources: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9127231/
Comparative data of childhood and adolescence molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons - PubMed
In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(This also isn’t proof to my original argument, it’s just observation that being homosexual is largely not a phenomenon that just happens out of the blue and there is usually a reason that someone prefers the same sex.)
Moving on…
The logic behind the reason why lesbians cannot exist is simply due to the fact that women cannot survive in nature without a man. That man, being Chad.
Women are all Chad bots (water) and there is absolutely no exceptions. First of all, we can acknowledge that being homosexual itself is outside of the biological norm. Heterosexual attraction is the biological norm because it is the only type of sexual attraction that directly results in reproduction. Anyways, there is no way in nature that a woman can be lesbian because of SURVIVAL. Why lesbians cannot exist is simply due to the fact that women cannot survive in nature without a man. That man, being Chad.
Women are the ones who are the most vulnerable in nature, there is no means for them to be independent, because they’d die off. They need to be dependant on a man and that man is Chad. They are hypergamous beings and have more rigid expectations because they need to maximize their survival to even get it close to a man’s. Although this is the modern world that women now have a technically better chance to live on their own in, this changes nothing because we are still animals at our core and parts of our brain have not evolved since the prehistoric times. We haven’t evolved to this modern world. There’s a reason women prefer violent guys because they hogged all the resources, even tho it would go against traits like parental investment that women were supposedly evolved to have. If we also took every single one of women’s rights away, they couldn’t do anything about it because in the end it’s about whose physically superior, they can’t fight or do anything to win over us.
Although this is water from a biological and evolutionary perspective, Chad is above ALL. This includes Stacy which is just a foid apart of his pool that he chooses from. All women regardless of how they look instinctively need Chad because they are completely dependant on him. Men on the other hand, are not dependant on anyone in nature they are the beings that women rely on. For this phenomenon of being homosexual existing, it doesn’t make sense for it to exist in women. Reproduction and survival go hand in hand, survival is also what fuels reproduction. If we don’t have means for survival, then the entire population would just die out. But if we simply have homosexual individuals the population would just decline. People would still be having kids. Remember that being homosexual will always be the minority in any species and it will always stay that way evolutionarily.
Women look at Chad and feel a sense of urgency and need for him, Gay men do not look at Stacy with an urgency and need for her. Women who claim they are “lesbian” act differently when Chad arrives, and suddenly she’s the one competing for him in a large pool of women.
