Ritalincel
⛆⛆⛆⛆
★★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2017
- Posts
- 35,797
I agree that we don't necessarily need more rules, but the right rules. I also agree with some of these propositions. This is almost it, but this ain't it chief.We don't need "more" rules, we need the RIGHT rules. And the right rules that would completely obliterate degeneracy, feminism and inceldom at once are just two of them:
1) women marrying as soon as puberty
2) no divorce bullshit
Done, everything solved. A woman who's married from puberty day one, can't divorce and faces several consequences for cheating is a woman who won't ever become a whore or a feminist.
Also, women not being allowed to work would also help a lot since they'd be dependent on the husband's income.
Glad to see that you agree on some of what I said at least. I thought you were one of those retarded "he's a pedo for wanting a virgin young wife" types. Glad to be wrong about it.I agree that we don't necessarily need more rules, but the right rules. I also agree with some of these propositions. This is almost it, but this ain't it chief.
Few problems, women marrying as soon as puberty, putting the deadline that quick, and forcing it will cause a lot of arranged marriages that wont end up that well. I'm not necessarily against all forms of arranged marriages don't get me wrong, it's just contextual. There's ways of forcing Marriage upon women, without actually forcing it. For example here's what a group i'm developed when it comes to these kind of thing that solves all the problems aswell.
That's not very far from reasonable but even better would be prohibition non-marital sex altogether, unless the foid wants to be a prostitute, which I'm not against even in an ideal traditional society. If she's not fit to be a wife, okay, be a prostitute then. But no Chad-exclusive amateur prostitutes who only after 30 want to marry a betabuxx like 90%+ of women are today.Age of Consent and Marriage:
Increasing the age of consent to 25 EXCEPT in cases of marriage and making the ramifications of premarital sex before the age of 25 aswell as divorce very harsh.
That's fair but I have a problem with the best years of foids going to waste. The best would be to pressure then to be married by 14 at the very least.Now you may view increasing the age of consent as a bad thing, HOWEVER when you take a look at the caveats it says, you can have sex under the age of 25, as long as you get married, and the ramifications for divorce and premarital sex are EXTREMELY harsh, and there'd also be a system of rewarding people who tell on offenders, so basically people would be HIGHLY HIGHLY discouraged from being a degenerate or promiscuous, or getting married after the age of 25. They'd be forced to find a partner before the age of 25, and get married to them, and they'd basically be stuck with them, or they're fucked.
I agree 100%, glad to see you defend those.And yes there would be harsh punishments for cheating, women would not be allowed to college, or learn the same things in the same way men do, I mean these are just obvious.
True, I was positively surprised with your answer since I was convinced you were a retarded type of "moralfag".It seems we probably agree on more than we disagree on, I think you're just not viewing the whole picture here.
The point is, the choice is not the foid's, bur rather her father's. Women should have 0% freedom about important stuff.People can still be getting married and having sex 16 and younger, but it'd be set up in such a way where it would be an extremely serious long term choice.
16 y/o is prime time
50 y/o is high iq
Foids can never be satisfied>I was 16 when I married a 50 year old man
I didn't need another reason to hate boomers, but you just gave me one OP.
Also why do amazingly hot women do stuff to their appearence that makes them less hot? With her body she'd be a 10 but she looks so fake and shitty it's like she brought herself down from a 10 to a 7.
There are people here who think this is okay
with your airsoftsh0t th0ts
Fat and low IQ, hang yourselfShould be increased to 25 (exception being people 25 and under who choose to get married) and heavily enforced to stop these boomers from stealing young women and further propagating the incel problem.
whats wrong with that? 16 is the age of consent in multiple states.
Yeah, I think everything should have a virgin wife, but beyond 25+ you shouldn't double dip into youngcels agematches. I think that leads to problem in society.Glad to see that you agree on some of what I said at least. I thought you were one of those retarded "he's a pedo for wanting a virgin young wife" types. Glad to be wrong about it.
The final solution is just taking away women's rights, there's various different systems, and they all technically work, it's just some work better and more beneficial than others. For example Islam works, their birthrates are great, they're thriving, etc, but it's not exactly optimal in certain aspects.Well, I think we need a huge cultural change. People, conservatives mainly, must realize that early marriages are the final solution to the women problem. I don't think they necessarily need to marry at day one of puberty, but that would be the ideal (with the father choosing the girl's husband), and within that culture, the more the foid waits, the less SMV she would have because people would accurately observe the fact that women have smaller fertility windows and also that they tend to become whores if they wait to long to marry and marry as non virgins. It would be tricky to make that transition, it would sadly take at least 2 or 3 generations even if we started now, which we most likely aren't doing the way things look.
The reason why I wouldn't outlaw non marital sex at 25+ is because its over for women at that point anyways genetically speaking, traditionalism and sexual rules matter much more for society under the age of 25, and i'm more an outlaw prostitution kind of guy, it's the whole NatSoc Weimar thing, causes more degeneracy than positive benefit.That's not very far from reasonable but even better would be prohibition non-marital sex altogether, unless the foid wants to be a prostitute, which I'm not against even in an ideal traditional society. If she's not fit to be a wife, okay, be a prostitute then. But no Chad-exclusive amateur prostitutes who only after 30 want to marry a betabuxx like 90%+ of women are today.
The optimal breeding time is actually around 18-23 health wise, any younger and or older and problems start to arise, that doesn't mean i'm necessarily against marrying 16 or younger, for long term, but still. They aren't going to waste unless they're 25+.That's fair but I have a problem with the best years of foids going to waste. The best would be to pressure then to be married by 14 at the very least.
I agree mostly, I believe in a patriarchal system, so not 100% rights removed slavery type stuff, but here's an example of a law that's heavily patriarchal in nature:The point is, the choice is not the foid's, bur rather her father's. Women should have 0% freedom about important stuff.
Girls who are 14-16 aren't mother material, they might be wife material, but they definitely aren't mother material.Also, even if such marriage ends up failing, let's say when the girl is around 25; it's still a 100 times better scenario than nowadays. She spent her best years being a wife and a mother, at that point her children are already almost adolescents, and although a divorce is always bad this is not nearly as bad as she wasting her prime years fucking Chads with contraception (or having kids for that matter, because even if some may argue genetic shit, being raised by a single mom is scientifically proven to be very harmful to people and to society) and then marrying a betabuxx at 30 something.
Not really, would force people to get married, and solve Inceldom.Bad idea. Would accomplish nothing aside from making it illegal to have sex in the human being's prime reproductive years.
Cope
Not an argumentFat and low IQ, hang yourself
It's over if true.She takes asian cock now.
Asian ASCENSION 2019
tobehonesttobehonestnotgoingtolietobehonestThere are people here who think this is okay
CopeIt is normal. This is how life is suppose to be
No you are coping because you want her but you can't cause she wants Chad and western laws and soyboys will let her be. Men marry downwards and it is a normal sight. Just a few generations ago it was the normCope
She's not with chad is she? She got with a 50 year old boomer who stole her from her agematch. Also I don't want her because she's not my looksmatch. It's never about jealousy for me, it's about balance. If I had two buttons right in front of me that let me get my match, or let everyone else get theirs, i'd easily choose the the button that gave everyone theirs, because that'd result in a better world.No you are coping because you want her but you can't cause she wants Chad and western laws and soyboys will let her be. Men marry downwards and it is a normal sight. Just a few generations ago it was the norm