Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

There are no arguments for universal and inalienable freedoms

Flagellum_Dei

Flagellum_Dei

Being misogynist is a moral obligation
Joined
Mar 24, 2024
Posts
1,059
Every writing that support those is based either on christian morality or other moralist madness. There is no logical basis to support that kind of inherited value for all people (or foids). Even if you assume they're right and every human have same inherited value, value of 2 people would still be higher than value of one and thus it's reasonable to give it a higher priority. If every human value is based upon something (productivity for example), then the result remain the same. You have to assume that this value is infinite and it's prohibited to try to measure it, what's absurd. This concept doesn't make sense.
 
Last edited:
Utilitarianism is the only moral framework that makes sense to me
 

Similar threads

P
Replies
12
Views
129
Papers Please
P
AustrianMogger
Replies
5
Views
231
AustrianMogger
AustrianMogger
annhilator66
Replies
12
Views
236
over_department
over_department

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top