Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

[Theory] The incel problem as a catastrophic failure mode of society

Fontaine

Fontaine

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Posts
5,417
This world we were born in is extremely weird. At one extreme, you have things like international suicide prevention day and anti-bullying campaigns, you have kindness and empathy, you have normies on reddit reacting to news of suicide with genuine sadness and compassion, you have courtesy and politeness, you have peace and flowers. But at the other extreme, you have men who have lost all hope, who feel so alienated that they hate society, men who kill themselves or others out of rage and despair, you have all kinds of negative acts and emotions, you have two world wars that killed over a hundred million people not that long ago, often in horrible conditions.

How can the two coexist?

My opinion is that society sometimes goes into failure modes. This happens when a failure follows another, and another, and so on. It happens rarely, but can have disastrous consequences. Eliezer Yudkowsky evokes such failure modes in his recent book Inadequate Equilibria.

Types of failure: asymmetry of information, unaligned interests, resource conflicts, powerlessness of those with the information and ignorance of those with the power.

World War 1 can be construed as a catastrophic failure of humanity.

Another such failure is the medical mismanagement of some diseases and health situations.

Another such failure is the existence of many men who have lost all hope and think that society hates them. The existence of, say, Elliott Rodger.

In the case of incels, what happens is this succession of failures:

(1) failure to treat everyone equally or at least with respect. Ugly boys in school are indeed treated worse on average than good-looking boys. This begins a process of anger and resentment.

(2) failure to recognize this mistreatment. Looks are taboo and bullying /discrimination over looks is taboo. This makes the mistreatment hurt more, almost by an order of magnitude.

(3) failure to manage the fallout of this mistreatment. Angry depressed boys are sent to "therapy", which usually doesn't solve the issue because of (1) and (2).

(4) failure to prescribe effective psychotropic drugs to reduce the depression. Only 1/3rd of patients react well to their 1st prescribed psychotropic drug, leading many to believe psychiatry can't help them.

(5) failure to say the truth about how romance and sex work. The standard normie lines are "just be confident", "just be honest and hard-working", or "work on your personality", which are insulting falsehoods.

(6) failure to react adequately to hateful, intolerant men. Instead of recognizing their psychological state as the result of unfair suffering, they are instead treated with contempt, reinforcing the anger and resentment.

And the saddest part is this: I don't envision how society could do anything about it.
 
Last edited:
59g6tjxm7ba11
 
Here we go again with the jewpills.
 
There is no kindness or empathy, only virtue signaling.
 
Here we go again with the jewpills.
I don't understand why psychiatry triggers incels so much. What's wrong with coping through drugs?
There is no kindness or empathy, only virtue signaling.
That's a very cynical / depressed view of mankind. I can say it's false. I have met people who have shown genuine compassion and friendship to me even though no one was there to be a witness of their "signaling".
 
No, empathy is real, it's just incredibly rare and those with true empathy get abused by society and everyone around them.

thats what i mean. but normies dont have empathy or only have it for their friends/family.
 
No, empathy is real, it's just incredibly rare and those with true empathy get abused by society and everyone around them.
Every human has empathy, however it is clearly unequally distributed, and those with the most empathy often have depression as a result of identifying too much with the suffering of others. They usually end up bitter misanthropes out of spite. For instance, both Jordan Peterson and Elon Musk obviously have very high empathy (crying on camera, etc). One is on SSRIs and the other is a workaholic who abuses Ambien.
 
Last edited:
I have met people who have shown genuine compassion and friendship to me even though no one was there to be a witness of their "signaling".
Really? Did they physically go out of their way to improve your situation? Energy or resources to your wellbeing? Lip service means nothing. Only females get tutorials.
 
No know a lot real life sociopaths and the most of them are foids.
Foids are natural born sociopaths. The only reason medias and study focus on men is because men sociopaths can express more violence and are less meticulous. Thus they are the most well known despite being rare exceptions.
 
This website is the current epicenter of human empathy is this world.
 
It is right theory tbh. Especially no. (2). When people are under treatment, but they are basicaly given bluepilled treatment, nobody would dare to be honest as it could potentialy hurt someone's feelings, but that's what's exactly wrong, bypassing the problems can't solve anything, it makes it worse, failing to acknowledge reality and basis of things, that's where psychology fails big time.
 
A shitstorm is brewing, cracks in our society are forming. We as a whole know about the rising problem of hypergamy and inceldom, but how many of us know about the impending doom which exists in every corner of society?
And the saddest part is this: I don't envision how society could do anything about it.
 
You give too much credit to virtue signaling, virtue signaling isn't genuine empathy.
 
This is very true and too relatable, although autism and others causes should not be excluded as reasons for bullying and social rejection.
 
you have normies on reddit reacting to news of suicide with genuine sadness and compassion, you have courtesy and politeness, you have peace and flowers.
They are just virtue signaling, even if it was "genuine", that "genuineness" only applies to that event, do they feel remorse and regret for the incels they ruthlessly bullied themselves? I think not, they are being selective which doesn't make them truly considered as "genuine".
 
And the saddest part is this: I don't envision how society could do anything about it.

The real blackpill is accepting that it can be no other way, indeed it should be no other way. This is how nature takes care of its detritus, how it removes entropy build-up in complex systems. We die, civilizations die, but the seed and egg live on--civilization is reborn.

So don't go against the current. Make what's already there better. Similar to how people are approaching the development of life extension therapies. Attack the problems of bullying at the core. Not with "education" or "laws" or "drugs". That's the feminine mentality and that shit doesn't work effectively, it only covers up the underlying issues.

So focus on ubiquitous positive eugenics and a vibrant gene selection market so that new generations of children are spared our looks curse. On the behavioral side, favor traits that lead to high IQ and individualism over collectivism. Through this, you will indirectly select for traits that lead to avoidance of violence, yet will resist tyranny and enslavement. To the high valuation of truth for one's dopamine stimulation rather than the egocentric pursuit of drama and chaos. Population groups predisposed to collectivism use bullying, coercion, peer pressure, deception, out-grouping and war to beat outliers and adjacent groups into submission. Again, the feminine mentality. Weed out the NPCs and group-thinkists. The more collectivist and centralized a society is, the more susceptible it is to failure. As soon as the environmental/external conditions reach a certain threshold, its over and shit collapses. Nature already does this on long enough timescales, we'd just be using technology to speed it up and give us a more comfortable gradient. A patchwork or network model, like the Internet, of many societies would be more resilient. This is usually what arises anyway during a civilizational dark age anyway. Not quite the antithesis of globalism, but rather the transcending of it, in same way that the Internet is global, yet forms the substrate of a multitude of different groups (at least as it was originally designed to be). Facebook, google, youtube, twitter etc. are all entering the same trap, the smart people have already fled or will soon flee. Microcosms of collectivist collapse syndrome that will bring about an Internet "dark age" soon enough.
 
The real blackpill is accepting that it can be no other way, indeed it should be no other way. This is how nature takes care of its detritus, how it removes entropy build-up in complex systems. We die, civilizations die, but the seed and egg live on--civilization is reborn.

So don't go against the current. Make what's already there better. Similar to how people are approaching the development of life extension therapies. Attack the problems of bullying at the core. Not with "education" or "laws" or "drugs". That's the feminine mentality and that shit doesn't work effectively, it only covers up the underlying issues.

So focus on ubiquitous positive eugenics and a vibrant gene selection market so that new generations of children are spared our looks curse. On the behavioral side, favor traits that lead to high IQ and individualism over collectivism. Through this, you will indirectly select for traits that lead to avoidance of violence, yet will resist tyranny and enslavement. To the high valuation of truth for one's dopamine stimulation rather than the egocentric pursuit of drama and chaos. Population groups predisposed to collectivism use bullying, coercion, peer pressure, deception, out-grouping and war to beat outliers and adjacent groups into submission. Again, the feminine mentality. Weed out the NPCs and group-thinkists. The more collectivist and centralized a society is, the more susceptible it is to failure. As soon as the environmental/external conditions reach a certain threshold, its over and shit collapses. Nature already does this on long enough timescales, we'd just be using technology to speed it up and give us a more comfortable gradient. A patchwork or network model, like the Internet, of many societies would be more resilient. This is usually what arises anyway during a civilizational dark age anyway. Not quite the antithesis of globalism, but rather the transcending of it, in same way that the Internet is global, yet forms the substrate of a multitude of different groups (at least as it was originally designed to be). Facebook, google, youtube, twitter etc. are all entering the same trap, the smart people have already fled or will soon flee. Microcosms of collectivist collapse syndrome that will bring about an Internet "dark age" soon enough.
I totally agree, extremely high IQ.

However, it's a poor comfort that only "future generations" will be spared our looks curse. I'd much rather believe that we have a chance too in our lifetime. And according to accelerationists like Kurzweil, we might.
 
I totally agree, extremely high IQ.

However, it's a poor comfort that only "future generations" will be spared our looks curse. I'd much rather believe that we have a chance too in our lifetime. And according to accelerationists like Kurzweil, we might.

Inspired by Kurzweil's daily regiment, I take phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylcholine, PQQ and methylated b-vitamins to improve & maintain memory recall. Now if only there were nootropics for face and bone structure. Yeah, if there's any hope, its with post-exascale intelligent systems and machine learning. Doesn't need to be AGI, just sufficiently general enough to map complex domains, like materials engineering and biosynthesis, and make new inferences in order to generate recipes/therapies for certain desired criteria. Existing software algorithms are probably good enough, but needs to be scaled up by a few magnitudes in terms of amount of data that can be gathered and processed beyond our present day supercomputers. Large scale quantum computing would be a boon for certain types of optimization problems.
 
Inspired by Kurzweil's daily regiment, I take phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylcholine, PQQ and methylated b-vitamins to improve & maintain memory recall. Now if only there were nootropics for face and bone structure. Yeah, if there's any hope, its with post-exascale intelligent systems and machine learning. Doesn't need to be AGI, just sufficiently general enough to map complex domains, like materials engineering and biosynthesis, and make new inferences in order to generate recipes/therapies for certain desired criteria. Existing software algorithms are probably good enough, but needs to be scaled up by a few magnitudes in terms of amount of data that can be gathered and processed beyond our present day supercomputers. Large scale quantum computing would be a boon for certain types of optimization problems.
wojak_00.nocrop.w710.h2147483647.2x.jpg
 

Similar threads

Rapistcel
Replies
16
Views
345
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
Replies
2
Views
258
Neucher The Kanga
Neucher The Kanga
NIKOCADO AVOCADO
Replies
16
Views
407
LUCK
LUCK
ldargoblin
Replies
25
Views
621
AntoCel
A
NIKOCADO AVOCADO
Replies
5
Views
264
Apex.Koala
Apex.Koala

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top