The word ‘Roastie’ is cope

[ColdLightOfDay]

People who use this word are the same who say girls should be married at 14 and made to commit to one partner their whole life. Well guess what geniuses... If it was a sexually active relationship, even if monogamous, then by the time she was 27-30 (the period most of you agree that sexually active women become roasties) then her labia would be in the same condition as if she had fucked 100 different guys an equal amount of times as she’d fucked her one monogamous husband.

It’s not the more cocks the labia has taken the more fucked up it gets, it’s the more times she’s had sex. Even if that sex was with you in a monogamous relationship.

 

[VisVoi]

Wrong. Non-monogamous women will have sex with more men and will be more likely to have sex with more well-endowed men than a monogamous woman.

Anyway, why shouldn't girls commit to one partner their entire life? Are you really so cucked that you believe their whole "finding myself" shit?

 

[Robtical]

her labia would be in the same condition as if she had fucked 100 different guys an equal amount of times as she’d fucked her one monogamous husband.

It comes down to "do you want a fresh piece of gum or a chewed up and spit out one?"

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

Wrong. Non-monogamous women will have sex with more men and will be more likely to have sex with more well-endowed men than a monogamous woman.

Anyway, why shouldn't girls commit to one partner their entire life? Are you really so cucked that you believe their whole "finding myself" shit?

If they did it wouldn’t solve anything, I truly believe that. You simply cannot rewind time and change things back how they were, we have moved on too far.

It comes down to "do you want a fresh piece of gum or a chewed up and spit out one?"

I don’t see it like that, you do not come into contact with another man’s ejaculate when you have sex with a girl, infact if she was clean she would be indistinguishable and anatomically identical to if she had only had one partner. if I was Chad I’d be the worst degenerate out there tbh.

 

[Robtical]

You simply cannot rewind time and change things back how they were, we have moved on too far.

We are already rewinded, "moving far" would mean men not allowing themselves to be cucked by low iq whores and (((them))).

I don’t see it like that, you do not come into contact with another man’s ejaculate when you have sex with a girl, infact if she was clean she would be indistinguishable and anatomically identical to if she had only had one partner. if I was Chad I’d be the worst degenerate out there tbh.

It's not just about the cleanliness. Their ability to pair bond has been effected too. Plus since they're older, they look worse, it's not fair she wasted her best years with chads then expects commitment from a sub6.

 

[Zaetheus]

I dislike the word “roastie” but I like calling them whores though. Just rolls off the tongue with ease.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

We are already rewinded, "moving far" would mean men not allowing themselves to be cucked by low iq whores and (((them))).

There is absolutely no way civil liberties can be rescinded on a mass scale once mass emancipation has taken place, especially in the age of the internet.

I know a lot of you are predicting societal collapse based on the rise of incelibate men but this is honestly a ridiculous pipe dream and delegitimises the political reputation of this forum and this community at large.

 

[BornAnUglyMale]

People who use this word are the same who say girls should be married at 14 and made to commit to one partner their whole life.

I agree with that though.

As for the roastie question,
https://ifstudies.org/blog/counteri...-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability

 

[Robtical]

There is absolutely no way civil liberties can be rescinded on a mass scale once mass emancipation has taken place, especially in the age of the internet.

You think men are emancipated? You can't cuck one but not the other.

I know a lot of you are predicting societal collapse based on the rise of incelibate men but this is honestly a ridiculous pipe dream and delegitimises the political reputation of this forum and this community at large.

That's something IT would say. Of course spreading the blackpill will make a difference, that's why they're doing everything they can to remove us from the internet and slander us. We're already mainstream, things will only go up hill from here.

 

[Robtical]

Do you really believe that a 14 year old forced into a relationship with a guy she finds unattractive is going to develop a stronger bond than with a guy she decides to settle with after years of trial and error?

14 year olds aren't as hypergamous and stuck up as older foids, if it was the norm they will be much happier than they are now like they were before the sexual revolution.

Even with the deficit in “ability to pair bond” taken into account, the fact she is essentially forced into a relationship with a guy she finds repulsive is not going to create a loving, stable pair bond is it? It’s a coper’s fantasy.

She will be ok with being in a relationship with her looksmacth from a young age because it will be normal, obviously now she'll think she's missing out, but that won't happen when things change. Men don't want to settle for old used roasties who can't pair bond either, so something has to give. And femoids have way too many privileges at men's expense, which won't be the case much longer.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

You think men are emancipated?

That's something IT would say. Of course spreading the blackpill will make a difference, that's why they're doing everything they can to remove us from the internet and slander us. We're already mainstream, things will only go up hill from here.

Disagreeing with the idea that an online community of virgins have the power to upturn world governments and shift the social paradigm is not a uniformly ‘IT’ position. There are many here who find the concept of a ‘beta uprising’ to be preposterous. As for spreading the Blackpill being a good thing, I agree with you. But if you’re expecting civil liberties of women to be restricted off the back of that then you are beyond deluded, I’m sorry to say.

The best you can hope for is that people realise that ugly people are not at fault for the way they look, and that they stop being treated like second class citizens.

 

[Robtical]

The best you can hope for is that people realise that ugly people are not at fault for the way they look, and that they stop being treated like second class citizens.

When that happens more rights and considerations will be given to sub6 males. Which is a good thing. Plus normies won't allow themselves to get cucked by used whores after getting exposed to the blackpill.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

14 year olds aren't as hypergamous and stuck up as older foids, if it was the norm they will be much happier than they are now like they were before the sexual revolution.

She will be ok with being in a relationship with her looksmacth from a young age because it will be normal, obviously now she'll think she's missing out, but that won't happen when things change.

Okay so it’s the first stage of implementation of your new world order and on the first day you have to tell all the current 14 year old girls that they are the first generation of a new way of doing things. You tell them they have to stop waring their miniskirts or short-shorts and take down their posters of Shawn Mendes (who they’re no longer allowed to listen to or fantasise about) and that they’ll no longer be going to school.

You also tell them that they should be excited to meet their knew husband; the wonderfully extatic goblin tier incel who she will be getting married to in a few days. Do you really think they’re going to “pair bond” well under these circumstances? What makes you think normies and Chads want this these kind of lives for their daughters? They don’t! They hate incels as much as their daughters do! Copers who believe this can happen live in imagination land.

 

[Unwanted]

It's not about the number of times, It's about the number of partners, you're really low IQ. It's not about labia or whatever.

It's a matter of principle. Did she have partners other than you and how many?

When we say "used-up" we don't mean it literally.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

When that happens more rights and considerations will be given to sub6 males. Which is a good thing. Plus normies won't allow themselves to get cucked by used whores after getting exposed to the blackpill.

If lookism ever truly gets recognised as a problem then I assure you it will be for both genders. There will be no ‘rights’ given to sub6 males, as “equality” (social progress’ golden calf in the 21st century) would never permit legislated allocation of rights to one group over another. Blackpill: Normies would rather things stay the way they are and they get to have sex with more than one woman in their entire life than return to a system where they only get to have one partner, however monogamous the relationship is.

It's not about the number of times, It's about the number of partners, you're really low IQ. It's not about labia or whatever.

It's a matter of principle. Did she have partners other than you and how many?

When we say "used-up" we don't mean it literally.

Most do actually, and that’s what the specific reference to the “roast beef like” appearance (which is what the insult intends to denigrate) of the labia implies. I am saying that the amount of partners a woman has had does not anatomically change her, so she is no more ‘used up’ in my eyes than if she had retained a single partner for her entire life. As I’ve said before, if I were Chad I would be taking part in degeneracy, and you’re a liar if you claim you wouldn’t do the same.

 

[Unwanted]

Most do actually, and that’s what the specific reference to the “roast beef like” appearance (which is what the insult intends to denigrate) of the labia implies. I am saying that the amount of partners a woman has had does not anatomically change her, so she is no more ‘used up’ in my eyes than if she had retained a single partner for her entire life. As I’ve said before, if I were Chad I would be taking part in degeneracy, and you’re a liar if you claim you wouldn’t do the same.

I'd take advantage and pump and dump as many foids as I can, sure.

But I'd never commit or marry a girl that has had sexual partners other than myself before, never, believe me. That's cuck behavior,

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

I'd take advantage and pump and dump as many foids as I can, sure.

But I'd never commit or marry a girl that has had sexual partners other than myself before, never, believe me. That's cuck behavior,

That’s because you’re coping and if you were average or good-looking then you really wouldn’t give a fuck.

The fact that you are unable to attain a partner in the first place is the only thing convincing you that you’d be happier without one. This is cope101.

And to your point earlier about me being low-IQ for thinking that the word “Roastie” doesn’t imply that a woman is physically rather than figuratively used up. Why the fuck is it specifically referencing a physical trait of having had lots of sex then? The implication with the insult “Roastie” is clearly “ew, look how gross her labia is it looks like roast beef from all the guys she’s fucked” rather than “ew, look how gross this whore is, the amount of guys she’s fucked has degraded and debased her and made her labia look like roast beef, although she’d have that even if she’d stayed with a single partner anyway”. Come on, I shouldn’t have to explain this.

 

[Robtical]

Okay so it’s the first stage of implementation of your new world order and on the first day you have to tell all the current 14 year old girls that they are the first generation of a new way of doing things. You tell them they have to stop waring their miniskirts or short-shorts and take down their posters of Shawn Mendes (who they’re no longer allowed to listen to or fantasise about) and that they’ll no longer be going to school.

Yes, that should be the new narrative in the media. Anti-cuck commercials will be aired every show break, and men will be debrainwashed thoroughly and so will the foids. If the foid decides to disgrace her family and future husband to get pumped and dumped by chads, then she will have to deal with the consequences that comes with it in a blackpill society. Today they're free and even encouraged to be whores, and femoids are followers who do what's acceptable.

You also tell them that they should be excited to meet their knew husband; the wonderfully extatic goblin tier incel who she will be getting married to in a few days. Do you really think they’re going to “pair bond” well under these circumstances?

If they are each other's first and society encourages monogamy, then they will be fine with their looksmatches.

What makes you think normies and Chads want this these kind of lives for their daughters? They don’t! They hate incels as much as their daughters do! Copers who believe this can happen live in imagination land.

That's what the debrainwashing and mass awakening is for. Cucks and whores need to be shamed for their low iq until they eventually see the truth.

 

[YungCell]

Okay so it’s the first stage of implementation of your new world order and on the first day you have to tell all the current 14 year old girls that they are the first generation of a new way of doing things. You tell them they have to stop waring their miniskirts or short-shorts and take down their posters of Shawn Mendes (who they’re no longer allowed to listen to or fantasise about) and that they’ll no longer be going to school.

You also tell them that they should be excited to meet their knew husband; the wonderfully extatic goblin tier incel who she will be getting married to in a few days. Do you really think they’re going to “pair bond” well under these circumstances? What makes you think normies and Chads want this these kind of lives for their daughters? They don’t! They hate incels as much as their daughters do! Copers who believe this can happen live in imagination land.

Finally someone else who realizes the whole enslavement of foids wont happen, the closest thing is the Islamic treatment of women but that's just a betabuxxing a sex slave, the 40s-60s were the golden age where women were taught to look for stability and kind men over Chad.

 

[Unwanted]

That’s because you’re coping and if you were average or good-looking then you really wouldn’t give a fuck.

The fact that you are unable to attain a partner in the first place is the only thing convincing you that you’d be happier without one. This is cope101.

And to your point earlier about me being low-IQ for thinking that the word “Roastie” doesn’t imply that a woman is physically rather than figuratively used up. Why the fuck is it specifically referencing a physical trait of having had lots of sex then? The implication with the insult “Roastie” is clearly “ew, look how gross her labia is it looks like roast beef from all the guys she’s fucked” rather than “ew, look how gross this whore is, the amount of guys she’s fucked has degraded and debased her and made her labia look like roast beef, although she’d have that even if she’d stayed with a single partner anyway”. Come on, I shouldn’t have to explain this.

You're the one coping here buddy. If you get a non-virgin girlfriend tomorrow, you'd still end up thinking about her past sexual experiences, her past blowjobs, her past anals, her previous partners' penis sizes, while you were a virgin before meeting her. Even if you think you wouldn't, you still would. A relationship like that wouldn't last very long, trust me.

That's the true nature of blackpill, once you swallow it there's no going back. You won't see women the same, especially non-virgin ones.

 

[YungCell]

That's like saying calling a potato a potato is a cope, at one point even foids who have olny been with one guy will become roasties but if they guy refuses to continue sleeping with his wife because of it then he is a volcel considering he cooked up the roast beef.

 

[Robtical]

Normies would rather things stay the way they are and they get to have sex with more than one woman in their entire life than return to a system where they only get to have one partner, however monogamous the relationship is.

I'm pretty sure a normie would rather be with his looksmatch than fuck random landwhales every few years.

 

[Deleted member 126]

 

[ICanOnlyFapToBDSM]

roastie is a meme and it's intentionally meant to sound childish and immature it's meant to troll femoids who are too dumb to "get it"

 

[Angus13]

Great, another one of those 1 sided "appeal to nature" cuckcels. Keep dancing monkey, I'm sure the normies are quite entertained.

 

[Sgtpinkie]

Cool

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

roastie is a meme and it's intentionally meant to sound childish and immature it's meant to troll femoids who are too dumb to "get it"

This interpretation I can actually get on board with because at least it’s honest about it’s intentions. I honestly think that for most who use it this not the case though and it is a genuine attempt to lampoon the physical attribute as most are too low IQ have bought into a concerted effort to troll without spilling the beans. Maybe your interpretation is true for some, I hope most, but I know there are others too who see it the way I mentioned.

I'm pretty sure a normie would rather be with his looksmatch than fuck random landwhales every few years.

Okay so now we’ve strayed into another area, the answer is no they wouldn’t, not for life. The notion of having to settle down with your first ever partner is not exciting to normies, only incels. There is an effort by many incels to cope by painting normies’ love lives as arduous, depressing and little better than that of an incel. The truth is most normies’ sex lives are fine, and if you showed them a picture of their looksmatch and asked if they’d want to marry them at 14 rather than experience sex and partying they would not choose to marry. You’re applying incel mindset to normies, they really do not think like that and they will never join a cause to limit their sexual freedoms. The only people who would want to do that are the sexually disenfranchised who have no other feasible way to experience non-paid for sex.

 

[ICanOnlyFapToBDSM]

This interpretation I can actually get on board with because at least it’s honest about it’s intentions. I honestly think that for most who use it this not the case though and it is a genuine attempt to lampoon the physical attribute as most are too low IQ have bought into a concerted effort to troll without spilling the beans. Maybe your interpretation is true for some, I hope most, but I know there are others too who see it the way I mentioned.

Okay so now we’ve strayed into another area, the answer is no they wouldn’t, not for life. The notion of having to settle down with your first ever partner is not exciting to normies, only incels. There is an effort by many incels to cope by painting normies’ love lives as arduous, depressing and little better than that of an incel. The truth is most normies’ sex lives are fine, and if you showed them a picture of their looksmatch and asked if they’d want to marry them at 14 rather than experience sex and partying they would not choose to marry. You’re applying incel mindset to normies, they really do not think like that and they will never join a cause to limit their sexual freedoms. The only people who would want to do that are the sexually disenfranchised who have no other feasible way to experience non-paid for sex.

Yes lots of cucktears and people like ContraPoints take it way too serious but it's literally a joke



The "beta uprising" "roastie" "reee normies" "tendies" memes all came from around the same time on /r9k/. meant to be tongue in cheek but calling roasties roasties is still funny because they rage.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

You're the one coping here buddy. If you get a non-virgin girlfriend tomorrow, you'd still end up thinking about her past sexual experiences, her past blowjobs, her past anals, her previous partners' penis sizes, while you were a virgin before meeting her. Even if you think you wouldn't, you still would. A relationship like that wouldn't last very long, trust me.

Honestly, I would not give a shit because I do not consider her anatomically altered from if she had had a single partner. As I said, if I were Chad I’d be the biggest degenerate of them all. Also it is such a 13 year old trope to worry that your cock isn’t big enough to satisfy a girl, most adults don’t do this dude, sorry to break that to you. Also, I’m pretty sure that if you got a gf tomorrow you’d be too drunk with euphoria to concern yourself with all that shit anyway. Also I said “if you were an average or good-looking guy you wouldn’t give a fuck” which is true because in that case it’s implied you’d have had enough sexual partners to not feel intimidated by lack of experience.

Yes lots of cucktears and people like ContraPoints take it way too serious but it's literally a joke



The "beta uprising" "roastie" "reee normies" "tendies" memes all came from around the same time on /r9k/. meant to be tongue in cheek but calling roasties roasties is still funny because they rage.

You have shown me a scenario where there is an exception and I totally acknowledge it in that case, honestly though man you’d be surprised how many people here believe in an actual social paradigm shift and ‘beta uprising’. Call them the Jehova’s witnesses of the Incel community. I’m speaking to a couple in this very thread!

 

[th62eathhts2]

roastie is a meme and it's intentionally meant to sound childish and immature it's meant to troll femoids who are too dumb to "get it"

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

Great, another one of those 1 sided "appeal to nature" cuckcels. Keep dancing monkey, I'm sure the normies are quite entertained.

Okay pal, come back with a legitimate criticism next time.

 

[NeiboltStreet]

When that happens more rights and considerations will be given to sub6 males. Which is a good thing. Plus normies won't allow themselves to get cucked by used whores after getting exposed to the blackpill.

I'm not sure that exposing normies to the blackpill will do anything, tbh.

They will just refuse it. Exactly like any remotely bluepilled concept is rejected by us.

Normies aren't treated like incels by foids. They're cucked, yes, but not humiliated and shunned from society, like us. They never experienced the blackpill, so they'll never believe it. You can give them all the scientific evidence you want, an average IQ normie will believe his own personal experience over scientific evidence any day.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

Normies aren't treated like incels by foids. They're cucked, yes, but not humiliated and shunned from society, like us. They never experienced the blackpill, so they'll never believe it. You can give them all the scientific evidence you want, an average IQ normie will believe his own personal experience over scientific evidence any day.

Also this.

It’s because most incels cope by saying that the Blackpill drastically affects normies’ lives because for some reason it makes them feel better to think that everyone is suffering only a little less than them. When in reality normies have it fine and would not want anything to change.

 

[Deleted member 60]

Another ridiculous cope. Do you really believe that a 14 year old forced into a relationship with a guy she finds unattractive is going to develop a stronger bond than with a guy she decides to settle with after years of trial and error?

Even with the deficit in “ability to pair bond” taken into account, the fact she is essentially forced into a relationship with a guy she finds repulsive is not going to create a loving, stable pair bond is it? It’s a coper’s fantasy.

except it's not a cope, retard. Studies have shown that women with more sexual partners are more likely to cheat. Why are you defending hypergamy? The female tendency for "trial and error" doesn't benefit you in any way. You sound like someone from cucktears right now, whiteknighting females and encouraging us to betabux.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

except it's not a cope, retard. Studies have shown that people with more sexual partners are more likely to cheat. Why are you defending hypergamy? The female tendency for "trial and error" doesn't benefit you in any way.

There, you just said it yourself. I don’t believe things to be true because it benefits me to do so. I believe in them because they’re actually true. Believing in something only because the belief benefits you in some way is literally the dictionary definition of cope.

Also the only reason those with less partners cheat less is because they either have lower sexdrives or are more religious/conservative, they choose to have less partners. That doesn’t mean that if forced to the wider population would happily do the same.

 

[Weed]

What do you mean the word 'roastie' is a cope? It's a synonym of the word female.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

What do you mean the word 'roastie' is a cope? It's a synonym of the word female.

Most use it as a specific denigration of the fact that many females have labia that resembles roast beef from fucking so many partners. But as I point out, the same effect would occur from her fucking a single partner an equal number of times.
love your avi btw.

 

[Weed]

Most use it as a specific denigration of the fact that many females have labia that resembles roast beef from fucking so many partners. But as I point out, the same effect would occur from her fucking a single partner an equal number of times.
love your avi btw.

I always used the word roastie as a synonym for females and they start having sex since the age of 12 anyway but by what you have said is true because it's common sense.

 

[Deleted member 60]

Pair bonding/just be first theory is legit. You're coping hard if you think some slut is capable of loving you after fucking so many other (superior) men. It seems like you don't understand dual mating strategy. This is blackpill 101

Do you really believe that a 14 year old forced into a relationship with a guy she finds unattractive is going to develop a stronger bond than with a guy she decides to settle with after years of trial and error?

It would be the same. Keyword is "settle."

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

I always used the word roastie as a synonym for females and they start having sex since the age of 12 anyway but by what you have said is true because it's common sense.

Yeah, that’s what I’m trying to point out, admittedly there are scenarios where use of the word isn’t cope - such as the one you mentioned.

It’s just that for many incels it is the gross appearance of the labia that they are specifically mocking with the word ‘roastie’, in which case it’s cope because she’d have it with a single partner anyway.

Pair bonding/just be first theory is legit. You're coping hard if you think some slut is capable of loving you after fucking so many other (superior) men.

It would be the same. Keyword is "settle."

No way man, come on. You cannot seriously believe that having a girl forced to marry an unattractive guy at 14 is going to produce a stronger bond than with a guy who chose her and who she chose herself. Incels often idealise the past as if it was some utopian time. Truth is that marriage used to be about economic convenience, not love. There was no increased ‘pair bonding’ between two young people who aren’t attracted to each other physically and have nothing in common.

 

[Ritalincel]

> r/badwomensanatomy

 

[Deleted member 60]

No way man, come on. You cannot seriously believe that having a girl forced to marry an unattractive guy at 14 is going to produce a stronger bond than with a guy who chose her and who she chose herself. Incels often idealise the past as if it was some utopian time. Truth is that marriage used to be about economic convenience, not love. There was no increased ‘pair bonding’ between two young people who aren’t attracted to each other physically and have nothing in common.

It worked out well for a lot of people in my family. The couples who were semi-arranged actually have stronger relationships than the ones who got into dating. The younger generation is fucked, all of them are getting divorces or cheating on each other. Enforced monogamy works. Civilization was built on it.

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

It worked out well for a lot of people in my family. The couples who were semi-arranged actually have stronger relationships than the ones who got into dating. The younger generation is fucked, all of them are getting divorces or cheating on each other. Enforced monogamy works. Civilization was built on it.

Civilisation is undergoing unprecedented changes. What ‘worked’ for most of history will not work now. You may cite personal anecdotes of how you know people in semi-arranged marriages who are more stable but studies suggest that they are more likely to be sexless after the arrival of children. Civilisation was built on more outdated conventions than merely monogamy; Slavery, conquest and a despotic aristocracy where all within the fabric of civilisation up until very recently as well, doesn’t mean they map well onto the modern world.

 

[Deleted member 60]

 

[EthnicelNL]

Just call everything cope theory.

 

[Robtical]

Normies aren't treated like incels by foids. They're cucked, yes, but not humiliated and shunned from society, like us. They never experienced the blackpill, so they'll never believe it. You can give them all the scientific evidence you want, an average IQ normie will believe his own personal experience over scientific evidence any day.

Normies can easily learn to be uncucked if it was socially acceptable to slut shame and cuck shame. Once sluts are discouraged from being promiscuous and men are discouraged from being cucks, then it will be more acceptable for the normies to speak up. There are already plenty of blackpilled and anti-feminist normies.

You cannot seriously believe that having a girl forced to marry an unattractive guy at 14 is going to produce a stronger bond than with a guy who chose her and who she chose herself.

It's not "forcing" them. It will be normal and femoids will be shamed if they disgrace their parents to ride the cock carousel.

Truth is that marriage used to be about economic convenience, not love. There was no increased ‘pair bonding’ between two young people who aren’t attracted to each other physically and have nothing in common.

Pair bonding can happen with virgins even if you're sub6, they aren't stuck up cunts like the sluts are.

You may cite personal anecdotes of how you know people in semi-arranged marriages who are more stable but studies suggest that they are more likely to be sexless after the arrival of children.

That's how it is with the cucked marriages too, so at least the guy will be better off having fun with her in her prime before she has kids, not after her prime when she lost all her ability to pair bond.

 

[Ritalincel]

Just call everything cope theory.

cope

 

[ColdLightOfDay]

Normies can easily learn to be uncucked if it was socially acceptable to slut shame and cuck shame. Once sluts are discouraged from being promiscuous and men are discouraged from being cucks, then it will be more acceptable for the normies to speak up. There are already plenty of blackpilled and anti-feminist normies.

Normies honestly wouldn’t want a monogamous society though. Part of the joy of being a normie is going out partying and having one night stands. Even if there are blackpilled and anti-feminist normies they would still favour this system to the authoritarian and despotic one you’re suggesting. Most people value freedom above all else in the 21st century and to believe they would eagerly return to a simpler time because you consider them a cuck is totally naïve. They don’t consider themselves cucks and they are totally comfortable having a gf who has had multiple partners before them because so have they. It’s only incels who have this neurotic obsession with female virginity because of being virgins themselves.

.
It's not "forcing" them. It will be normal and femoids will be shamed if they disgrace their parents to ride the cock carousel.

Clear contradiction. You are forced to do something if you are shamed into doing it and your jb wife will resent you for having been forced to be with you despite finding you unattractive. They are incapable of being attracted to unattractive guys. Using shame as a weapon to force them to marry you will not change this.

That's how it is with the cucked marriages too, so at least the guy will be better off having fun with her in her prime before she has kids, not after her prime when she lost all her ability to pair bond.

If she is forced to be with you through shame she will never pair bond with you no matter how much you may love her. It will only foster resentment and bitterness.

Men, because of their high sex drive make do with a female no matter how unattractive she is. For some reason you think there’s an equivalency for women, but there isn’t. Women simply cannot feel attraction towards true bottom tier men, never have, never will. The only difference between now and the past is that they were forced to marry them through shame, that doesn’t mean those marriages were romantic and love-filled, quite the contrary.

 

[Deleted member 60]

 

[Ritalincel]

tbh