D
Throughout a lot of history there has always been two types of societies that were able to expand a lot. The Sedentary Farmers and Nomad Herdsmen.
The difference was even noted in the Bible. Cain was a Farmer and Abel was a Herdsman.
And unfortunately like the bible, history has been favoring the Herdsmen a lot.
When you think about it, many civilizations had chad nomad rulers that influenced the areas massively.
India, Middle East, Eastern Europe etc.
Even places like China (Debatable since the Yellow Emperor himself was known be a chariot user) or western Europe, they might but not be ruled by horse nomads directly but leaders like Qin Shi Huang or Caesar had a lot of habits and traits that were very much in line with Nomadic rulers. Violent, arrogant, rough, dominating etc. Then you had guys like Vikings who used boats instead of horses to carry out their deeds.
There were far more Farmers than Nomads. Farming could support a much higher population. Yet in the end it was the minority of chad nomads who got to be rulers and push their ideas and decisions onto the weak farmers.
So what has this got to do with our present day situation?
Well as someone said, many Eastern European strongmen like politicians could claim descendant from those Chad nomads.
There's a good chance those Chads you hate so much are the modern offspring of the nomadic guys. Thats why even though there aren't that many of them, they stand out and seem to almost dominate normies. Normies are mostly descendants of the weak feeble farmers who were ruled by the Nomads. They have been ruled for so long, its almost like its in their DNA to automatically worship someone of the stronger ruling class. That's why there so much fucking Chad worship these days.
And I'm sorry to say but if you're posting here, mostly likely you're descendant of a lousy farmer. If you were truly descendant of those Nomadic people, you def wouldn't be low inhib for one.
Last edited:
