
Paladin
i'm just me
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2024
- Posts
- 15,047
Firstly you have the "Basically all guys are incel nowadays"/"All sub 8 men are incels in 2025"
These guys are either one of two things, fakecels trying to justify themselves as actual incels or actual incels that are coping not wanting to believe that they are in the minority and really are in the very bottom percentage of guys for being incels. I can understand and agree with the claim that most men fall into the "nearcel" category in that while they aren't completely touch deprived like we are they end up getting cheated on, divorceraped and in general not given respect at all by their girlfriends. There's also been an increase in sexlessness in modern times among men, a lot of guys while not being incels end up on long dry streaks and I'd consider these guys to be nearcels. Plenty of recent studies can attest to this.
But claiming that the majority of men are completely touchless incels in the same way we are is ridiculous.
And then you have pretty much the exact opposite of this, instead of thinking that most guys are incels they go to the other extreme and gatekeep inceldom to a ridiculous level. "Anyone who mogs me even slightly in any area is a fakecel" "I am the only truecel/I am the biggest truecel on .is". These types of users are always extremely annoying to interact with, constantly dismissing other users problems viewing themselves as the main character and the blueprint for inceldom. They'll often fixate on certain traits and claim "If you are X then you can't be incel" especially with things like race and while I agree that the racepill is real I dislike terms like JBW or JBB because they imply that all you need to get laid is to be part of a certain race with no looks threshold required to be met which is very obviously false. The worst part is that so many of these types of users get exposed either as complete and utter larpers or at least that they were greatly exaggerating how low SMV their SMV is.
These guys are either one of two things, fakecels trying to justify themselves as actual incels or actual incels that are coping not wanting to believe that they are in the minority and really are in the very bottom percentage of guys for being incels. I can understand and agree with the claim that most men fall into the "nearcel" category in that while they aren't completely touch deprived like we are they end up getting cheated on, divorceraped and in general not given respect at all by their girlfriends. There's also been an increase in sexlessness in modern times among men, a lot of guys while not being incels end up on long dry streaks and I'd consider these guys to be nearcels. Plenty of recent studies can attest to this.
But claiming that the majority of men are completely touchless incels in the same way we are is ridiculous.
And then you have pretty much the exact opposite of this, instead of thinking that most guys are incels they go to the other extreme and gatekeep inceldom to a ridiculous level. "Anyone who mogs me even slightly in any area is a fakecel" "I am the only truecel/I am the biggest truecel on .is". These types of users are always extremely annoying to interact with, constantly dismissing other users problems viewing themselves as the main character and the blueprint for inceldom. They'll often fixate on certain traits and claim "If you are X then you can't be incel" especially with things like race and while I agree that the racepill is real I dislike terms like JBW or JBB because they imply that all you need to get laid is to be part of a certain race with no looks threshold required to be met which is very obviously false. The worst part is that so many of these types of users get exposed either as complete and utter larpers or at least that they were greatly exaggerating how low SMV their SMV is.