Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

the three most commonly proposed solutions to inceldom. which one do you support?

title


  • Total voters
    46
blackpillednigga

blackpillednigga

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Posts
11,286
marxist-rodgerist solution: government mandated gfs for all

eugenicist solution: only allow chads to reproduce and/or end the lineage to the subhuman genes

SFcel solution: white ethnostate with government mandated gfs. deport all ethniccels to their home countries
 
2 - 3 support eugenics so no gf for u 1 one will never exist
Just rope
 
eugenics approach wouldn't work since promiscuous Chads wouldn't be able to help themselves from breeding incel factories.
 
egyptian-rodgerism

 
Eugenics but not only chads can reproduce. This would basically lead ro rich people being allowed to reproduce while poor people get eradicated jfl. Genetics change over time, so eugenics should be implemented but it shouldn't be this extreme. And world population needs to be reduced
 
marxist-rodgerist solution: government mandated gfs for all

eugenicist solution: only allow chads to reproduce and/or end the lineage to the subhuman genes

SFcel solution: white ethnostate with government mandated gfs. deport all ethniccels to their home countries
marxist-rodgerist solution can still adopt eugenics in gattaca style i.e. egalitarian eugenics where everyone follows monogamy while simultaneously ensuring their genetic progeny is still genetically better off than their parents
 
marxist-rodgerist solution can still adopt eugenics in gattaca style i.e. egalitarian eugenics where everyone follows monogamy while simultaneously ensuring their genetic progeny is still genetically better off than their parents
this obviously needs the democratization of embryo selection or some other fancy biotech i.e. making it economically feasible for the poor and the middle class
 
genetic modification or even cyborgs
 
i support Elliotist rodgerism
 
Do nothing and cope with vidya
 
I support enforced cultural decency, such as enforce monogamy, and light eugenic policies that promote people will good genes and punish people harshly with bad genes(such as criminals, don't let violent criminals out ever or just kill them)
Hard eugenics is a touchy topic for me, I can't think of why it's wrong besides that humans probably don't have the wisdom to conduct it correctly and because I'm not sure the technology will ever truly exist, but something about it feels wrong to me that I can't explain in words.
 
We are not clones of our parents. Chads and stacies can have ugly children
u can't completely purge shit alleles and to get anywhere close you'd have to sterilize 95% of the population. Chad and Stacy will have to live in the dark ages and sterilize any of their genetic dead end kids.
 
I propose publicly shaming any woman who gets with a guy above her looks level so it incentivizes women to go for men in their league. If all women dated men on their looks level, then it wouldn’t be hard to get a gf on your looks level
 
Other: Transhumanism and AI gfs.
 
A nuclear winter would solve all our problems
 
3rd option. It wouldn't completely solve the Incel problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.

It is very easy to slip into the cracks if 70% of the women in your host nation prefer a different phenotype.
 
Inceldom isn’t a bug or a defect; it’s a feature. None of these will solve the driving factor of this issue, which is the cruelty of human nature. Only transhumanism can end this suffering.
 
None. I don't give a shit about anything or anyone. Humans are a bunch of blood sucking parasites. Total death and annihilation of the entire human race is well deserved as far I'm concerned.
 
Nuke this shitty world and shove it into a black hole
 
Nuke this shitty world and shove it into a black hole
Something like this where normie genocide happens and 130+ iq incels survine the apocalypse and create fallout or rodgerists.
SF are just white chad worship,eugenists are chad worship+foid worship(no sub5 woman eliminiated from gene pool)
 
eugenists are chad worship+foid worship(no sub5 woman eliminiated from gene pool)
According to whom? As a eugenicist I want to sterilize dysgenic foids as much as dysgenic men.
 
I'd prefer Marxist Rodgerism, but sadly, this isn't plausible to actually put into action.

Regular Marxism managed to gain some ground because it only required both factory and rural workers to unite, which is easy. Both work hard, just in different ways. It's not hard to understand that.

Marxist Rodgerism would require all men to understand that they have it worse in the dating market than Chad or Stacy, and considering that chadlites still exist and men tend to leverage hierarchies, even artificial ones, doing that would be a lot harder. Sure, you'd get the ugly men on board and some normies, but what about the slightly good-looking normies? Or the soyboys who frequent IT? Or the people who go on IT to simp for women, just to say "heh, those evil incels, am I right, guys? (please give pussy)"? Try convincing Chad to support the cause. the only man who benefits from the current dating system above women. It's like trying to convince a CEO that marxism is the way and to push for it without it being a retarded PR move to get brownie points with lefties.

Eugenics, well, we're already living in it, and judging from the existence of these forms, we're not too happy about it, are we?

I've never actually heard of SFcels until now. Honestly, under my interpretation of Marxist Rodgerism, men of different races would be forced to procreate with their looks-matching race only, if available. It would be good for the crime stats of such a state, though.
 
According to whom? As a eugenicist I want to sterilize dysgenic foids as much as dysgenic men.
Most eugenicist normies worship foids and think their worship of chad is good and incels deserve it.
I wasnt talking bout you brocel.
 
Eugenics, well, we're already living in it, and judging from the existence of these forms, we're not too happy about it, are we?
Are you retarded? Dysgenic women are allowed to breed more so than ever. A real eugenic society wouldn’t discriminate in eliminating those who spread bad genes from the gene pool.
 
Are you retarded? Dysgenic women are allowed to breed more so than ever. A real eugenic society wouldn’t discriminate in eliminating those who spread bad genes from the gene pool.
If society was eugenic we wouldnt be here.
 
Primitivism is the only solution to any form of inequality, including inceldom. Just go apeshit on whatever becky you want.

If you're looking for a more realistic "solution", then keeping women out of the workforce and placing more importance on honor would minimize it most.
 
If society was eugenic we wouldnt be here.

Eugenics simply shifts the goalposts further. An 7/10 (current standard) chadlite would be considered sub5 in a society that puts priority on aesthetic eugenicism.
 
Simple.

Increase number of female babies to increase the female:male ratio,

Abort male babies. Only handsome men can have male babies, ugly men must have female offspring.

Only men can vote.
 
I support Marxist rodgerist in a race segregated country, with mixed people deported into a designated slave colony and those who refuse are genocided.
 
The only one that actually has a chance of happening is eugenics
 
Other. Full acknowledgement of lookism and other problems incels are disproportionately affected by by society on the level that racism and sexism currently are with everything that comes with it, no or absolutely minimal restrictions on porn, fully affordable and state-subsidized prostitution, and eventual societal embrace of transhumanism in all of its forms to lessen or eradicate unjust hierarchies and sociobiological barriers stopping people from enjoying life to the fullest, and of course broadening of said "the fullest".

Other: Transhumanism and AI gfs.
Based:yes::yes:.
 
I like the sex robot and AI girlfriends solution.
 
marxist-rodgerist solution: government mandated gfs for all

eugenicist solution: only allow chads to reproduce and/or end the lineage to the subhuman genes

SFcel solution: white ethnostate with government mandated gfs. deport all ethniccels to their home countries
The “eugenics approach” is simply the current status quo. Sub5 foids (incel factories) are still allowed to reproduce however, thus maintaining inferior genetics.

However, even if we managed to wipe out lesser genes, this wouldn’t resolve anything as the standards would simply increase. If a true eugenics solution was put in place (applied to both men and women) we can assume for the sake of argument that nearly all men would be at minimum 6’2 and 8/10 (by current standards). However, this would result in foids demanding men to be at minimum 6’6 and calling 6’ tall men literal manlets. An 8/10 man would just be an average man in this world, and women would still demand further perfection.
 
I would prefer the siberian traps to be activated again and mankind to be extinguished forever.
 
Mix of SFcel+eugenics+gene editing which somewhat ties into AI+waifu robot GFs & "trans humanism" ig

I ofc see broader societal issues as a larger problem & wish to address it.

I think modern multicultural/diverse societies cause issues for us all, be it in terms of dating/smv and also social issues such as crime, housing, jobs, wages, etc.

I also believe these societies encourage for more innovation, and I do consider myself a realist, in that Europeans & East Asians will be the ones to carry us forward as a species the most. Not saying other races deserve to be mistreated, it's just my observation based on history & studies I've read, as well as what I can just see outside at times.

I do support eugenics, not in killing off "uglies" or non-NT, but more of stuff to ensure that the overall human condition improves

Currently, we are very dysgenic:
WomenPromoteDysgenics


Gene-editing ties into this also, and so some degree of trans-humanism is needed.


Something such as this can improve looks, as well as heath, intelligence, etc.
Other. Full acknowledgement of lookism and other problems incels are disproportionately affected by by society on the level that racism and sexism currently are
Lookism towards males, in general, is much more of an issue than racism or sexism

I also include NT v. Non-Nt under that umbrella
with everything that comes with it, no or absolutely minimal restrictions on porn,
Ideally, porn would be restricted -but this is hypothetically speaking if we're speaking of the underlying broader societal issues- not just addressing inceldom head-on alone.

There's studies showing porn is detrimental to your brain, and if this:
fully affordable and state-subsidized prostitution,
Were the case I would never use it

Agreed here for same case as above
and eventual societal embrace of transhumanism in all of its forms to lessen or eradicate unjust hierarchies and sociobiological barriers stopping people from enjoying life to the fullest, and of course broadening of said "the fullest".
Transhumanism is something I've had a vague interest in, but can never fully buy for many reasons; I disagree strongly with the "all its forms here"

I do support technology, but I support improving overall human quality of life instead of trying to make everyone a cyborg. Realistically, if we gave over too much power we could end up like the Borg.

To me, it just doesn't sit right to want to inevitably erase all of these valid human, biological identities such as race & sex which nature clearly has created for us. Ik you do agree with me on the basic concept of race realism as well as also are aware of the GR agenda and ofc see the issues it brings & how it is detrimental so society, not to mention ofc you want to "mateguard" foids. Now what would this be worth to just deconstruct this all after, unless ofc we are focusing on inceldom by itself . I also am worried people may try and use this to justify stuff such as transgenderism, modifying for LGBT stuff(clearly, these people cannot be trusted to keep it in private) and various other issues. Not to mention, it could cause for people to want to be "animals" or whatever and try to make hybrid species which would be another can of worms. Basically, I think this affords humans too much freedom

Some hierarchies are made to be imo, but some are constructed & do need to be broken down, such as that of NT v Non-NT imo.

To me, I just do not think we can place all this full faith in technology and want it to erode humanity, only for the concept of "enjoyment"

Imo, we need a balance of some kind of "tradition" and acknowledging the past & some of what it gave us to preserve, but also want a cycle of progress. By doing this, we are placing too much value in "technology" as opposed to a balance which humanity needs

I was a bit surprised by your response here since you seem to enjoy nuance, but ofc this address incledom solely and not societal issues at large. I will say, it is a good point since it does address inceldom universally, however it also seems like too much of an "idealist" solution and not pragmatic.

Simply overall, I agree with some aspects of it but placing full-faith in it alone for Inceldom and especially humanity as a whole is not ideal, especially if it just wants to erase the idea of "humanity" as a whole which imo would be very dystopian and with current trends, would lead to more issues.

":incel:: I just want a waifu GF & also to be tall & NT"

":soy::foidSoy:: I want to be a transracial transexual leopard who can do what it wants and live life to the full!"
Other: Transhumanism and AI gfs.
Viking Dommy mommy with a thick ass & perfect tits to give a nursing handjob when? :feelsohh: :ahegao:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top