Normies always call people "virgin" that have some kind of personality(-trait) they dislike so doesn't the term "virgin" literally imply a major personality change once you lose your virginity? So essentially when you get laid you would turn from "virgin" or "incel" to just normal/normie?
I'm pretty sure there also actually is a change in your brain that happens when you first get laid... I've always wondered what makes normies so normie and i'm pretty sure it's this amongst other things. Below like 18 everyone is normie, whether or not they get laid. I also notice i was basically a normie during my child and teen times. Then when you turn 21+ and you still didn't get laid you turn mad, depressive and aggressive due to sexual frustration. Its so fucking retarded how someone that got laid 100 times tells a virgin he cannot be mad about being a virgin, how could you fucking tell if you aren't in the same situation and at the same time you yourself argue that losing virginity does a major personality change. How many like 24+ old male/female virgins are there that don't get progressively more mad/depressive with time?
You can basically argue that everyone who doesn't, is asexual or has some other sexual problem or disinterest because if someone had normal/overly sexual interest but couldn't ever get laid, you want to tell me, they wouldn't turn increasingly more mad over time? If they don't, they don't really have a sexual interest again so by definition and logic, you will turn mad over not getting laid.
And yet a retarded dipshit that got laid 100 times, with an entirely different brain chemistry essentially because they have no sexual frustration, wants to tell me, i'm a bad person or i have a bad personality towards women? Literally by definition the only people are truely misogynistic are people who get unconditional love by women and STILL continue to hate them for no reason. How many true misogynistics exist based on that definition? And you could argue that also all of these are psychopaths or something. If they exist, they are few (and probably in jail right now). The only true "incel" personality has a person which by definition receives enough love from women that it would satisfy their individual brain and still has an (ever increasing) hatred to women. Having a never satisfied high expectation of women is again rather a symptom of psychopathy in men. (For women it is rather natural unfortunately) Apart from hypocritcal people on the internet, i doubt anyone would even judge a man in real life for having extremely high standards. (Assuming he is quite attractive)
Per definition i basically cannot find a true "incel" or "misogynistic" to even exist. It would require pure and utter hatred for no reason whatsoever towards women which, considering how a true free will (basically making decisions at complete random) doesn't even exist, true incels also can't exist.
I only see a bunch of people with sexual frustration on this forum and you could probably test a normie with it by just inserting some chemicals in him that increases their libido or sexual frustration to the level of a 24+ virgin and they won't last a year. So how can the term incel or virgin exist, implying biological or psychological change after sex, but at the same time, you use it as an insult against people, implying completely reasonless hatred, that you cannot even relate/judge or comprehend because of your non virgin brain. And incel personality or not.. if someone would get laid, by your definition they wouldn't be a virgin anymore and they wouldn't act like an incel anymore unless they are actual psychopaths because they have no reason to hate women anymore so they probably won't.
Literally completely irrelevant if someone doesn't get laid, because, they are shitty to women apparently. After they get laid, they wouldn't be shitty towards women anymore so your argument, to justify them not getting laid, because of their personality, doesn't make sense. At best you could argue they don't deserve to get laid because of it but why would you argue that they deserve to get laid once they change their personality then when they could just get laid which automatically would change their personality and thus making them deserving of getting laid? Normie logic
I'm pretty sure there also actually is a change in your brain that happens when you first get laid... I've always wondered what makes normies so normie and i'm pretty sure it's this amongst other things. Below like 18 everyone is normie, whether or not they get laid. I also notice i was basically a normie during my child and teen times. Then when you turn 21+ and you still didn't get laid you turn mad, depressive and aggressive due to sexual frustration. Its so fucking retarded how someone that got laid 100 times tells a virgin he cannot be mad about being a virgin, how could you fucking tell if you aren't in the same situation and at the same time you yourself argue that losing virginity does a major personality change. How many like 24+ old male/female virgins are there that don't get progressively more mad/depressive with time?
You can basically argue that everyone who doesn't, is asexual or has some other sexual problem or disinterest because if someone had normal/overly sexual interest but couldn't ever get laid, you want to tell me, they wouldn't turn increasingly more mad over time? If they don't, they don't really have a sexual interest again so by definition and logic, you will turn mad over not getting laid.
And yet a retarded dipshit that got laid 100 times, with an entirely different brain chemistry essentially because they have no sexual frustration, wants to tell me, i'm a bad person or i have a bad personality towards women? Literally by definition the only people are truely misogynistic are people who get unconditional love by women and STILL continue to hate them for no reason. How many true misogynistics exist based on that definition? And you could argue that also all of these are psychopaths or something. If they exist, they are few (and probably in jail right now). The only true "incel" personality has a person which by definition receives enough love from women that it would satisfy their individual brain and still has an (ever increasing) hatred to women. Having a never satisfied high expectation of women is again rather a symptom of psychopathy in men. (For women it is rather natural unfortunately) Apart from hypocritcal people on the internet, i doubt anyone would even judge a man in real life for having extremely high standards. (Assuming he is quite attractive)
Per definition i basically cannot find a true "incel" or "misogynistic" to even exist. It would require pure and utter hatred for no reason whatsoever towards women which, considering how a true free will (basically making decisions at complete random) doesn't even exist, true incels also can't exist.
I only see a bunch of people with sexual frustration on this forum and you could probably test a normie with it by just inserting some chemicals in him that increases their libido or sexual frustration to the level of a 24+ virgin and they won't last a year. So how can the term incel or virgin exist, implying biological or psychological change after sex, but at the same time, you use it as an insult against people, implying completely reasonless hatred, that you cannot even relate/judge or comprehend because of your non virgin brain. And incel personality or not.. if someone would get laid, by your definition they wouldn't be a virgin anymore and they wouldn't act like an incel anymore unless they are actual psychopaths because they have no reason to hate women anymore so they probably won't.
Literally completely irrelevant if someone doesn't get laid, because, they are shitty to women apparently. After they get laid, they wouldn't be shitty towards women anymore so your argument, to justify them not getting laid, because of their personality, doesn't make sense. At best you could argue they don't deserve to get laid because of it but why would you argue that they deserve to get laid once they change their personality then when they could just get laid which automatically would change their personality and thus making them deserving of getting laid? Normie logic
Last edited:
