“OMG, those Incels are so horrible, I just lost all sympathy for them.”
Could anyone explain to me what this supposed sympathy for “struggling men” actually consists of?
You see, it’s hard for me to recognise any tangible difference in how “romantically struggling but not misogynist men” and actual Incels are treated by the general populace.
I think you will agree with me because most of us have been both.
Both are treated like a joke, but with Incels, normies have social permission to do away with the pretence of sympathy.
Both get feed the same platitudes and useless advice.
Both get told to seek therapy.
Both get bullied and made fun of for things outside of our control.
And both are ultimately unattractive to women.
Normie Sympathy is just self-righteous virtue signalling at best and semi-subtle bragging at worst.
It’s the same kind of sympathy they have for beggars on the street or starving Africans: They say how sorry they feel for them but would not spend a penny to alleviate their plight. It’s just performative.
The only way to garner real, worthwhile sympathy is through the projection of Fear and Danger.
It’s only thanks to mass shootings and similar incidents that normie-society starts to give a fuck about male mental health or bullying (with questionable effectiveness but I appreciate the intention).
If loser men were just to suffer in silence until they kill themselves, normies would be perfectly happy with this arrangement. No action required. But of course we would have their full sympathy.
Just like almost no one gave a fuck about CO2 emissions until very recently, it took a few hurricanes and floods and a lot of dead bodies and now everyone is in a hurry to save the environment. Normies learn through Fear and Pain.
Incels must do what Blacks and Muslims have done for many decades now: Induce society-wide Stockholm syndrome through as constant stream of ultra-violence.
Could anyone explain to me what this supposed sympathy for “struggling men” actually consists of?
You see, it’s hard for me to recognise any tangible difference in how “romantically struggling but not misogynist men” and actual Incels are treated by the general populace.
I think you will agree with me because most of us have been both.
Both are treated like a joke, but with Incels, normies have social permission to do away with the pretence of sympathy.
Both get feed the same platitudes and useless advice.
Both get told to seek therapy.
Both get bullied and made fun of for things outside of our control.
And both are ultimately unattractive to women.
Normie Sympathy is just self-righteous virtue signalling at best and semi-subtle bragging at worst.
It’s the same kind of sympathy they have for beggars on the street or starving Africans: They say how sorry they feel for them but would not spend a penny to alleviate their plight. It’s just performative.
The only way to garner real, worthwhile sympathy is through the projection of Fear and Danger.
It’s only thanks to mass shootings and similar incidents that normie-society starts to give a fuck about male mental health or bullying (with questionable effectiveness but I appreciate the intention).
If loser men were just to suffer in silence until they kill themselves, normies would be perfectly happy with this arrangement. No action required. But of course we would have their full sympathy.
Just like almost no one gave a fuck about CO2 emissions until very recently, it took a few hurricanes and floods and a lot of dead bodies and now everyone is in a hurry to save the environment. Normies learn through Fear and Pain.
Incels must do what Blacks and Muslims have done for many decades now: Induce society-wide Stockholm syndrome through as constant stream of ultra-violence.
Last edited:
