Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The study "Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics"

  • Thread starter Lazyandtalentless
  • Start date
Lazyandtalentless

Lazyandtalentless

Personalitycel
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 21, 2024
Posts
7,708

The study “Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics” investigates the connections between bodily attractiveness, fluctuating asymmetry (FA), and sex-typical physical traits.

Key Findings
  1. Fluctuating Asymmetry and Attractiveness
    • Fluctuating asymmetry (FA), a measure of developmental stability, showed a negative correlation with bodily attractiveness in both men and women. Lower FA (indicating greater symmetry) corresponded to higher attractiveness ratings.
    • This suggests that symmetrical bodies may reflect better phenotypic quality and developmental stability.
  2. Sex-Typical Body Traits
    • Sex-typical physical features were consistently rated as more attractive. For men, these included greater height, broader shoulders, and larger torso volume. For women, preferred traits were a lower waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), longer legs, and higher bust-to-under-bust ratios.
    • These characteristics are thought to have evolved through sexual selection due to their links to reproductive success.
  3. FA and Sex-Typicality
    • Lower FA was associated with more pronounced sex-typical traits. In men, this translated to more “masculine” features (e.g., broader shoulders), while in women, it meant more “feminine” traits (e.g., lower WHR).
    • This finding supports the idea that sex-typical traits may serve as indicators of underlying developmental stability.
  4. Joint Configuration and Attractiveness
    • Geometric morphometric analysis showed that sex-typical joint configurations were tied to male attractiveness but not female attractiveness. In men, masculine joint configurations (e.g., a broader upper body) predicted higher attractiveness ratings.
  5. Sex Differences in Correlations
    • Distinct patterns emerged in how FA related to body shape across sexes:
      • In men, FA had a negative relationship with height, torso volume, and shoulder breadth.
      • In women, FA was positively linked to height and torso volume but negatively correlated with WHR and leg slenderness.
Implications
  1. Evolutionary Significance
    • The results align with sexual selection theories, where physical traits signaling health, fertility, or competitive ability are preferred by potential mates.
    • Symmetry, as a sign of developmental stability, may explain its widespread appeal across cultures.
  2. Sexual Dimorphism
    • The study emphasizes the role of sexually dimorphic traits in mate preferences, showing that these traits enhance attractiveness while offering clues about genetic quality and reproductive potential.
  3. Methodological Advances
    • Using 3D body scanning and controlled 360° video stimuli, the study reduced variables like clothing or facial appearance, enabling a more accurate focus on body shape’s impact on attractiveness.

Conclusion
This research highlights the evolutionary roots of human aesthetic preferences, showing how symmetry and sex-typical physical characteristics serve as markers of phenotypic quality and reproductive fitness.
 
Absolutely brutal. :feelsbadman: The symmetrypill hits me hard because of my deviated nasal septum
 

Similar threads

Lazyandtalentless
Replies
1
Views
276
pizzamaxxer
pizzamaxxer
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
8
Views
466
Emba
Emba
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
4
Views
360
lifeisfucked215
lifeisfucked215
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
1
Views
695
R(p)apist1488
R(p)apist1488

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top