Other than a provider, the natural role of a man was to guarantee security . Be it security from outside dangers, or from other men that would seek to use and dump the woman if she wasn't already claimed and protected by a man. Her family would try to find a good man to pass her to, and then he'd protect her in exchange for sex, companionship, and mainly children of course.
But the state has usurped that role. Now, women are not only protected and coddled by society, they are actually protected by law and the threat of violence that the state has against us in case we violate those laws.
Women now don't need men. They can only want a man, a certain type of man - Chad. And the difference between need and want is very great.
And on a similarly important note, the role of provider has been usurped too. Women can now get jobs (easy jobs, tailored to women where they don't do anything and are overpaid). They don't need a man to provide for them, or if they want to be provided for, they'll go for the very best, the millionaires, preferably the good-looking ones too.
A woman isn't tied to a man by need anymore. It's all what she wants. But they still have biological impulses that push them to procreate and thus settle down for a while. However, since her existence has been governed by what she wants, she isn't used to being shackled to monogamy and responsibility, so she becomes miserable, and thus she divorces her provider, takes his resources, and looks for a better alternative.
And since a man's value is attached to the wants of women, only superficial and largely meaningless, cosmetic values are appreciated, thus worthless, idiotic Chads are now very successful on the sexual marketplace, and other values are largely irrelevant.
But the state has usurped that role. Now, women are not only protected and coddled by society, they are actually protected by law and the threat of violence that the state has against us in case we violate those laws.
Women now don't need men. They can only want a man, a certain type of man - Chad. And the difference between need and want is very great.
And on a similarly important note, the role of provider has been usurped too. Women can now get jobs (easy jobs, tailored to women where they don't do anything and are overpaid). They don't need a man to provide for them, or if they want to be provided for, they'll go for the very best, the millionaires, preferably the good-looking ones too.
A woman isn't tied to a man by need anymore. It's all what she wants. But they still have biological impulses that push them to procreate and thus settle down for a while. However, since her existence has been governed by what she wants, she isn't used to being shackled to monogamy and responsibility, so she becomes miserable, and thus she divorces her provider, takes his resources, and looks for a better alternative.
And since a man's value is attached to the wants of women, only superficial and largely meaningless, cosmetic values are appreciated, thus worthless, idiotic Chads are now very successful on the sexual marketplace, and other values are largely irrelevant.
