The sexualization of women is a two way street. Why men see women as sex objects.

[LesscoBlob]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.

 

[LesscoBlob]

@Grim_Reaper thoughts?

 

[Diddy]

Foids know that their greatest asset is their bodies, and with it, they have all of soyciety on a leash, but the only downside is that it attracts unwanted attention from ugly men, which is why they complain about muh sexualization.

 

[LesscoBlob]

Foids know that their greatest asset is their bodies, and with it, they have all of soyciety on a leash, but the only downside is that it attracts unwanted attention from ugly men, which is why they complain about muh sexualization.

The thing is, these same women start complaining when "unwanted" men just leave them alone. The two sex-robot brothels that opened in Germany and The Netherlands were shut down by feminist organizations with the excuse of "sexual objectification of women".

 

[Diddy]

The thing is, these same women start complaining when "unwanted" men just leave them alone. The two sex-robot brothels that opened in Germany and The Netherlands were shut down by feminist organizations with the excuse of "sexual objectification of women".

It depends on how attention they're getting from them and it depends on the situation. If the ugly men check them out for two seconds then those foids will get an ego boost, but if it's longer than that, then they'll start to feel "predatory" vibes from them. For the brothels, they weren't satisfied with the amount of money they were making, so they shut it down.

 

[cvh1991]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.

High IQ observation man, well said

 

[cvh1991]

Foids know that their greatest asset is their bodies, and with it, they have all of soyciety on a leash, but the only downside is that it attracts unwanted attention from ugly men, which is why they complain about muh sexualization.

Based

 

[Diddy]

Based

How is that based?

 

[cvh1991]

How is that based?

Did you even read their comment? they said:
1) women know on some level their greatest asset is their bodies/their looks
2) they don’t really care about being treated like sex objects so long as it’s Chad. When they care it’s because they hate ugly low status men approaching them.

Sounds pretty based to me.

 

[Diddy]

Did you even read their comment? they said:
1) women know on some level their greatest asset is their bodies/their looks
2) they don’t really care about being treated like sex objects so long as it’s Chad. When they care it’s because they hate ugly low status men approaching them.

Sounds pretty based to me.

They'll only be based if they let us rape them anytime we want.

 

[LesscoBlob]

High IQ observation man, well said

Thanks man

 

[SoycuckGodOfReddit]

If females had to rely on their intelligence to get ahead, very soon we would be back to a society where women didn't work.

 

[cvh1991]

They'll only be based if they let us rape them anytime we want.

I think we may have been miscommunicating? I meant the comment pointing out what women are actually like was accurate, I wasn’t calling women themselves based.

 

[Diddy]

I think we may have been miscommunicating? I meant the comment pointing out what women are actually like was accurate, I wasn’t calling women themselves based.

Ah okay. That makes more sense.

 

[FinnCel]

High IQ observation

 

[Qeasi Cou]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.'

''their intelligence, personality''
>>women


View: https://youtu.be/CuUGqSiMYR4

 

[Monke]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Spoiler alert: men, who value intelligence, personality and interests are not interested in silicon filled bimbos with hobbies like shopping

 

[LesscoBlob]

Spoiler alert: men, who value intelligence, personality and interests are not interested in silicon filled bimbos with hobbies like shopping

Which is basically most men, since data has shown that conventionally ugly women are in infact MORE likely to marry than conventionally average looking women and even slightly above average looking women. Because you know, we as a mysoginistic society totally treat women as pieces of meat.

 

[Travis Bickle]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.

perSOYnailty of a foid is shortcoming they obviously don't want to play the game they are losing in.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.

It doesn't work this way. If you want men to stop buying, the second everyone does what you want men are not in a stable nash-equilirium. Any one man can now improve his position by going a bit lower and accepting a little more degeneracy from his women so he get's a larger share. Repeat until you're back where you began.
Keeping the price constant by force requires dictatorial power. An honor arrangement won't do it. In the past it worked because society had control over information flow on such a magnitued that it would require being a dictator in modern times and a strong interdependence between individuals in any small, village-size community. As soon as you upgrade to cities, your grip on the situation starts to weaken.

 

[wewuzaryansnshit]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.

very true and le based

 

[fang]

They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Feminists have managed to hijack academia at the very least.
You could dismiss it as humanities bullshit or as erosion of education as a whole but the fact still remains: the girlboss archetype is very real and they are able to perform both masculinity (traits listed) and feminity (their sexuality) to a great degree.
It's hard to talk down women when you're a trucel, in all honesty.

 

[stalin22]

Feminists love to complain about the sexualization of women while simultaneously profiting off it the most. They complain about not being valued for their intelligence, personality, or interests while not even trying to develop these things. (e.g pornstars, sugar babies, models etc.)

Many men actually find personality, intelligence and similar hobbies more attractive qualities than just looks, but know they can't realistically find a woman like that, because practically 0 women develop them, because they don't have to in order to be successful.

Think about the bluepilled-style dating advice men get vs the dating advice women get. Men are advised to be funny, caring, confident, smart, have a nice career, be a betabuxx, have "interesting" hobbies, etc. They're advised to advance themselves outside of their sexual value. Women's dating "advice" purely consists of choosing men who have these things and are Chads. They don't have to prove themselves as a worthy partner, just putting out is enough, and sometimes not even that.

The sexualization of women has nothing to do with "the patriarchy". It's that now women know that the only thing they have to do is exist.

But the fact of that matter is, that they can only profit from their sexual attractiveness (or lack thereof) because men are buying. If men didn't buy, they wouldn't be able to profit from it. It's a two-way street in some regard, but men are also at fault for buying what women are selling.

If men raised their standards and didn't buy every degenerate thing they could get their hands on, women would be forced to adapt to the new dating marketplace. As of now, there's no incentive to do so due to men's insanely low standards.

Sexualization is good as it give inate value to women