One of the main goals of the gynocrats is essentially to destroy Western institutions and the numen but the root has never been honestly dealt with, with the root being the neo-marxist revolution of the 1960s where the neo-marxist devised a plan to invade academia and replace the Western chattering class. This operation or the long march through the institutions as their ideological leader Gramsci said is working out quite well but few have engaged with its connection to the sexual revolution and libidinal rationality.
The sexual revolution was a cultural revolution perpetrated by neo-marxist with the intent of stripping man from meaning so they could spread Marxist Humanism. When Marx failed and was proven to be wrong, his adherents didn't give up but instead coopted the liberal and moderate leftist movements to deracinate society and strip man from meaning and the transcendent. The Marxist's first course of action was consent theory and enriching the feminist movement. These radical ideologies were very similar to each other where they were both anti-Western and idealistic drivel. Cultural Marxism is an ideology in which radical subjectivity and determinism is a form of self-actualization or your meaning reaching beyond every normal boundary and taboo to achieve sexual liberation and social transformation. Gender feminism is an ideology that considers gender identity to be determined by culturally accepted individual feeling and will or subjectivism rather than biological sex at birth. Both these ideologies being very similar, the neomarxist coopted this and they became one toward the late 1960s, together, cultural Marxism and gender feminism were the main driving forces behind the sexual revolution and the emasculation of traditional marriage and thus optimal social life. Their most significant effects have been to seriously weaken the lower middle-class Western nuclear family and its mores and to ruin the future of tens of millions of children now born in single-parent families who have had completely horrendous social lives. Gender feminism also is the source of the present-day transgender and Sodom movement. In Eros and Civilization you'll see the roots of the cultural marxist ideology where Marcuse talked about how the economic exploitation of people under capitalism is made possible by Western society’s alleged instinctual and psychic repression of the individual. To put it simply in a short screed, cultural Marxism sees domination as repression of eros and the need for release of radical sexual subjectivism. Radical subjectivity is the development of a form of sufatz or ineffective self-consciousness that finds present social conditions intolerable. The ultimate radical act of this is a refusal of these conditions and an new pervasive orientation toward social change. The baby boomers essentially established forms of subjectivity of existing systems of domination and replacing them with the achievement of a libidinal rationality and having a world of wretched polymorphous perversity or sexual subjectivity meaning the physical carnal world has no bearing and is another subjective system in which you can “do you own thing.” This was an amazing message to spread for spoiled affluent student radicals who were useful idiots to carry out Marcuse’s agenda. In the same time frame, the pill of death, backed by new unrestricted abortion, became widely available and Western attitudes about sexual relations began to change relative to invaded academia
Now we must make a distinction before I go further which is the difference between gender feminism and equity feminism. Equity feminism opposes unequal statutes opposed on women. Genders feminism denies human nature and basically wants to socially construct new gender identities and they basically follow this "logical" line which is that human interactions are considered to come about not from the motives of people dealing with each other as individuals, but instead actually come from the struggle among social groups for domination over each otherin this case, the male gender dominating the female gender. The feminist movement begins with Betty Freidan's book feminine mystique which I skimmed through and it was written in a very lofty and passive way which is of course aligned with how Freidan portrayed herself where she portrayed herself as a nice gowing suburban woman, when she was in reality a lying neomarxist who quite litterally called housewives prisoners of "comfortable concentration camps"
Transgender rights for those whose gender identity is not considered to correspond to that person’s biological sex at birth has become the latest epoche within gender feminism and is its innate manifestation. In its most extreme form, transgender rights is radical self-determination that would effectively emancipate children of any age from parental control and allow them to declare for themselves their gender or “who they really are” and have that required to be recognized by the state. Marcuse said that Freudian polymorphous perversity was wrongly being channeled into only monogamous marriage, which enforced submission to basic social restraint and the patriarchal compulsion to work. Cultural Marxism converged on the theory that the patriarchal authoritarian family and its repressive morality served the interests of the dominant class, this pretty much is the seminal idea to the modern SJW movement where SJWs blame an phantom oppressing force to effectively create a cult behind their ideology. College texts exaggerated the costs of marriage to adults, particularly women, and ignored the benefits of marriage and the well-being of children and the social sciences did everything they could to construct maximum individual freedom unencumbered by all forms of obligation and commitment in relationships. Those academically inspired beliefs along with the welfare state that subsidized only unmarried recipients until very recently instigated a massive disintegration of marriage and the nuclear family with the greatest effect have been a widespread normalization of mass infantacide
This perversion of authority will effectively lead to total collapse. The proportion of children living in single-parent households has increased twelvefold since 1970 and is at an all-time high. Western natives are currently at the extinction threshold as women are making less and less babies with the average being 1.69 children, and to not go extinct it would need to be at least 2.89 children, which is the strongest evidence supporting the fact that neomarxist have won and established a gynocracy where man can't be man and woman can't be woman effectively removing all meaning and the numen from society. This is why I expect a reciprocal invasion of the institutions by the fellahina which will be predicated on establishing the numen or some transcendent of the such
@Sir Silentium @D. B. Gooner
The sexual revolution was a cultural revolution perpetrated by neo-marxist with the intent of stripping man from meaning so they could spread Marxist Humanism. When Marx failed and was proven to be wrong, his adherents didn't give up but instead coopted the liberal and moderate leftist movements to deracinate society and strip man from meaning and the transcendent. The Marxist's first course of action was consent theory and enriching the feminist movement. These radical ideologies were very similar to each other where they were both anti-Western and idealistic drivel. Cultural Marxism is an ideology in which radical subjectivity and determinism is a form of self-actualization or your meaning reaching beyond every normal boundary and taboo to achieve sexual liberation and social transformation. Gender feminism is an ideology that considers gender identity to be determined by culturally accepted individual feeling and will or subjectivism rather than biological sex at birth. Both these ideologies being very similar, the neomarxist coopted this and they became one toward the late 1960s, together, cultural Marxism and gender feminism were the main driving forces behind the sexual revolution and the emasculation of traditional marriage and thus optimal social life. Their most significant effects have been to seriously weaken the lower middle-class Western nuclear family and its mores and to ruin the future of tens of millions of children now born in single-parent families who have had completely horrendous social lives. Gender feminism also is the source of the present-day transgender and Sodom movement. In Eros and Civilization you'll see the roots of the cultural marxist ideology where Marcuse talked about how the economic exploitation of people under capitalism is made possible by Western society’s alleged instinctual and psychic repression of the individual. To put it simply in a short screed, cultural Marxism sees domination as repression of eros and the need for release of radical sexual subjectivism. Radical subjectivity is the development of a form of sufatz or ineffective self-consciousness that finds present social conditions intolerable. The ultimate radical act of this is a refusal of these conditions and an new pervasive orientation toward social change. The baby boomers essentially established forms of subjectivity of existing systems of domination and replacing them with the achievement of a libidinal rationality and having a world of wretched polymorphous perversity or sexual subjectivity meaning the physical carnal world has no bearing and is another subjective system in which you can “do you own thing.” This was an amazing message to spread for spoiled affluent student radicals who were useful idiots to carry out Marcuse’s agenda. In the same time frame, the pill of death, backed by new unrestricted abortion, became widely available and Western attitudes about sexual relations began to change relative to invaded academia
Now we must make a distinction before I go further which is the difference between gender feminism and equity feminism. Equity feminism opposes unequal statutes opposed on women. Genders feminism denies human nature and basically wants to socially construct new gender identities and they basically follow this "logical" line which is that human interactions are considered to come about not from the motives of people dealing with each other as individuals, but instead actually come from the struggle among social groups for domination over each otherin this case, the male gender dominating the female gender. The feminist movement begins with Betty Freidan's book feminine mystique which I skimmed through and it was written in a very lofty and passive way which is of course aligned with how Freidan portrayed herself where she portrayed herself as a nice gowing suburban woman, when she was in reality a lying neomarxist who quite litterally called housewives prisoners of "comfortable concentration camps"
Transgender rights for those whose gender identity is not considered to correspond to that person’s biological sex at birth has become the latest epoche within gender feminism and is its innate manifestation. In its most extreme form, transgender rights is radical self-determination that would effectively emancipate children of any age from parental control and allow them to declare for themselves their gender or “who they really are” and have that required to be recognized by the state. Marcuse said that Freudian polymorphous perversity was wrongly being channeled into only monogamous marriage, which enforced submission to basic social restraint and the patriarchal compulsion to work. Cultural Marxism converged on the theory that the patriarchal authoritarian family and its repressive morality served the interests of the dominant class, this pretty much is the seminal idea to the modern SJW movement where SJWs blame an phantom oppressing force to effectively create a cult behind their ideology. College texts exaggerated the costs of marriage to adults, particularly women, and ignored the benefits of marriage and the well-being of children and the social sciences did everything they could to construct maximum individual freedom unencumbered by all forms of obligation and commitment in relationships. Those academically inspired beliefs along with the welfare state that subsidized only unmarried recipients until very recently instigated a massive disintegration of marriage and the nuclear family with the greatest effect have been a widespread normalization of mass infantacide
This perversion of authority will effectively lead to total collapse. The proportion of children living in single-parent households has increased twelvefold since 1970 and is at an all-time high. Western natives are currently at the extinction threshold as women are making less and less babies with the average being 1.69 children, and to not go extinct it would need to be at least 2.89 children, which is the strongest evidence supporting the fact that neomarxist have won and established a gynocracy where man can't be man and woman can't be woman effectively removing all meaning and the numen from society. This is why I expect a reciprocal invasion of the institutions by the fellahina which will be predicated on establishing the numen or some transcendent of the such
@Sir Silentium @D. B. Gooner
