(BOOK SOURCE: AYURVEDA BY Saint Simon)
(INFORMAL PAPER OF SORTS, HEAVY INSPIRATION FROM AUVERDA AND VARIOUS OTHER SOURCES)
One of the main goals of the gynocrats is essentially to destroy Western institutions and the numen but the root has never been honestly dealt with, with the root being the neo-marxist revolution of the 1960s where the neo-marxist created a plan to invade academia and replace the Western chattering class.
This operation or the long march through the institutions as Gramci said is working out quite well but few have engaged with its connection to the sexual revolution and libidinal rationality.
All these radical ideologies were very similar to each other where they were both anti-Western and idealistic drivel but simply put, cultural Marxism is an ideology in which radical subjectivity and determinism is a form of self-actualization or your meaning reaching beyond every normal boundary and taboo to achieve sexual liberation and social transformation. And, Gender feminism is an ideology that considers gender identity to be determined by culturally accepted individual feeling and will or subjectivism rather than biological sex at birth.
Both these ideologies being very similar, the neomarxist coopted this and they became one toward the late 1960s, in which where cultural Marxism and gender feminism were the main driving forces behind the sexual revolution and the emasculation of traditional marriage and thus optimal social life.
Their most significant effects and corrals have been to seriously weaken the lower middle-class Western nuclear family and its mores and to ruin the future of tens of millions of children now born in single-parent families who have had completely horrendous social lives and severe deprecation of good social resource.
Gender feminism also is the source of the present-day transgender and Sodom movement. In Eros and Civilization you'll see the roots of the cultural marxist ideology where Marcuse talked about how the economic exploitation of people under capitalism is made possible by Western society’s alleged instinctual and psychic repression of the individual.
To put it simply in a short screed, cultural Marxism sees this Western domination as repression of eros and the need for release of radical sexual subjectivism.
Radical subjectivity is the development of a form of sufatz or ineffective self-consciousness that finds present social conditions intolerable.
And, the baby boomers essentially established these forms of subjectivity of existing systems of domination in which where they replaced them with the achievement of a libidinal rationality and having a world of wretched polymorphous perversity or sexual subjectivity meaning the physical carnal world has no bearing and is another subjective system.
(())
Now we must make a distinction before I go further which is the difference between gender feminism and equity feminism. Equity feminism opposes unequal statutes opposed on women. (It’s important to note both are equally bad)
Genders feminism denies human nature and basically wants to socially construct new gender identities and they basically follow this "logical" line which is that human interactions are considered to come about not from the motives of people dealing with each other as individuals, but instead actually come from the struggle among social groups for domination over each otherin this case, the male gender dominating the female gender.
The feminist movement begins with Betty Freidan's book feminine mystique which I skimmed through and it was written in a very lofty and passive way which is of course aligned with how Freidan portrayed herself where she portrayed herself as a nice gowing suburban woman, when she was in reality a lying neomarxist who quite litterally called housewives prisoners of "comfortable concentration camps"
This ties into transgenderism greatly where in its most extreme form, transgender rights is radical self-determination that would effectively emancipate children of any age from parental control and allow them to declare for themselves their gender or “who they really are” and have that required to be recognized by the state.
Marcuse basically said in coral to this that Freudian polymorphous perversity was wrongly being channeled into only monogamous marriage, which enforced submission to basic social restraint and this phantom patriarchal compulsion to work so he basically advocated for sex anarchy which is the root of this whole thing
This perversion of authority will effectively lead to total collapse. Western natives are currently at the extinction threshold as women are making less and less babies with the average being 1.69 children since they are refusing to have sex and to not go extinct it would need to be at least 2.89 children, and there's no escaping this cycle unfortunately.
This is a rather seminal balk for the fellahina revolution I predict to be soon to come and will indefinitely be exalted upon in the future so lay might your eyes.
(INFORMAL PAPER OF SORTS, HEAVY INSPIRATION FROM AUVERDA AND VARIOUS OTHER SOURCES)
One of the main goals of the gynocrats is essentially to destroy Western institutions and the numen but the root has never been honestly dealt with, with the root being the neo-marxist revolution of the 1960s where the neo-marxist created a plan to invade academia and replace the Western chattering class.
This operation or the long march through the institutions as Gramci said is working out quite well but few have engaged with its connection to the sexual revolution and libidinal rationality.
All these radical ideologies were very similar to each other where they were both anti-Western and idealistic drivel but simply put, cultural Marxism is an ideology in which radical subjectivity and determinism is a form of self-actualization or your meaning reaching beyond every normal boundary and taboo to achieve sexual liberation and social transformation. And, Gender feminism is an ideology that considers gender identity to be determined by culturally accepted individual feeling and will or subjectivism rather than biological sex at birth.
Both these ideologies being very similar, the neomarxist coopted this and they became one toward the late 1960s, in which where cultural Marxism and gender feminism were the main driving forces behind the sexual revolution and the emasculation of traditional marriage and thus optimal social life.
Their most significant effects and corrals have been to seriously weaken the lower middle-class Western nuclear family and its mores and to ruin the future of tens of millions of children now born in single-parent families who have had completely horrendous social lives and severe deprecation of good social resource.
Gender feminism also is the source of the present-day transgender and Sodom movement. In Eros and Civilization you'll see the roots of the cultural marxist ideology where Marcuse talked about how the economic exploitation of people under capitalism is made possible by Western society’s alleged instinctual and psychic repression of the individual.
To put it simply in a short screed, cultural Marxism sees this Western domination as repression of eros and the need for release of radical sexual subjectivism.
Radical subjectivity is the development of a form of sufatz or ineffective self-consciousness that finds present social conditions intolerable.
And, the baby boomers essentially established these forms of subjectivity of existing systems of domination in which where they replaced them with the achievement of a libidinal rationality and having a world of wretched polymorphous perversity or sexual subjectivity meaning the physical carnal world has no bearing and is another subjective system.
(())
Now we must make a distinction before I go further which is the difference between gender feminism and equity feminism. Equity feminism opposes unequal statutes opposed on women. (It’s important to note both are equally bad)
Genders feminism denies human nature and basically wants to socially construct new gender identities and they basically follow this "logical" line which is that human interactions are considered to come about not from the motives of people dealing with each other as individuals, but instead actually come from the struggle among social groups for domination over each otherin this case, the male gender dominating the female gender.
The feminist movement begins with Betty Freidan's book feminine mystique which I skimmed through and it was written in a very lofty and passive way which is of course aligned with how Freidan portrayed herself where she portrayed herself as a nice gowing suburban woman, when she was in reality a lying neomarxist who quite litterally called housewives prisoners of "comfortable concentration camps"
This ties into transgenderism greatly where in its most extreme form, transgender rights is radical self-determination that would effectively emancipate children of any age from parental control and allow them to declare for themselves their gender or “who they really are” and have that required to be recognized by the state.
Marcuse basically said in coral to this that Freudian polymorphous perversity was wrongly being channeled into only monogamous marriage, which enforced submission to basic social restraint and this phantom patriarchal compulsion to work so he basically advocated for sex anarchy which is the root of this whole thing
This perversion of authority will effectively lead to total collapse. Western natives are currently at the extinction threshold as women are making less and less babies with the average being 1.69 children since they are refusing to have sex and to not go extinct it would need to be at least 2.89 children, and there's no escaping this cycle unfortunately.
This is a rather seminal balk for the fellahina revolution I predict to be soon to come and will indefinitely be exalted upon in the future so lay might your eyes.
Last edited by a moderator:
