Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over The real problem with hypergamy

giganticel

giganticel

Greycel
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Posts
61
In the context of a relational, sentimental and sexual world as a vast market, hypergamy consists in trying to obtain, in exchange for its value on the sex market, the best material advantages and possible finances.

Hypergamy is distinguished from prostitution: indeed, the prostitute is perfectly aware of what she does and does not lie to herself or to her client. The hypergamous, on the contrary, tries to make herself believe and make her target believe that her attitude is guided by her feelings, her desires or other reasons judged by herself and by society as more legitimate than the desire for a higher status. And in many cases, this attraction is sincere: hypergamy is not necessarily lying; it is simply "programmed" like that.

To the extent that men are perceived as the holders of financial capital and the most important incomes (which is false, or at least highly qualified, but nevertheless anchored in mentalities), it is generally women who practice hypergamy: male hypergamy exists but it is much rarer, not to say exceptional, for lack of opportunities rather than virtue.

From the point of view of a hypergamous woman, men fall into two categories: those whom she perceives as materially superior to her, and who become sexually desirable (or, at least, with whom a relationship is conceivable), and those who she perceives as inferior, and who become sexually invisible.

Hypergamy is not necessarily linked to money: other brands of power, security or social status can be substituted, depending on the societies, the periods or the ages of life: thus, the attraction of all the females around the best hunter of the tribe, the noble with the prestigious lineage, the businessman full of aces or still, in high school, the only boy in the class to own a scooter, also fall under hypergamy.
Hypergamy manifests itself in different ways. The most visible is, of course, the fact that, for a woman, one does not consider sexual or sentimental relationships with a man who is not in a good social environment (in fact, when a marriage brings together two partners who are not from even in the middle, it is almost always the woman who comes from the poorest background, and very rarely the opposite). A more common and discreet form of hypergamy is for a woman to look for a man who is more confident and determined (and therefore reassuring) than she is, or simply taller. is another way to feel safe (this time physically or emotionally, rather than financially).

In the past, hypergamy meant that a woman would marry a man who was usually a little older than herself and already physically fit, and who could maintain her and their children. In today's ultra-liberal society of morality, hypergamy is reflected in a strong tendency to move from one spouse to another, depending on the opportunities and interest that each brings: it is no longer a question of forming stable couples or economically viable families, but of trying to obtain a maximum of one's own SMV. For very hypergamous women, love and sex are nothing but means to access another social status without having to work to get what they want. This trend is encouraged by a series of film productions or other forms of art, which, from Pretty Woman to Bridget Jones, inculcate young girls that they only have to wait for Prince Charming and seize the opportunity when it presents itself, and that it will always be for him to deserve them, never the other way around.

The problem of hypergamy does not lie in wishing to obtain the "best deal" possible for the price of its value on the sex market: this is indeed the case for all individuals. But where the healthy individual wishing for better partners will start by increasing his own SMV (by playing sports, cultivating, personally improving, etc.), the hypergam will just jump from a relationship with another, according to opportunities, so as to garner maximum earnings without offering more to his spouses.

The level of hypergamy varies greatly among individuals: some women are very hypergamous, others are only slightly. The most hypergamous are easy to spot: they are the ones that will be easily seduced by external signs of power (wealth, beautiful car, nice suit, attitude alpha). Unsatisfied eternal, hypergamous tend to consider their current companion as a temporary partner, waiting for better outcomes, and will abandon him as soon as a better opportunity arises. More generally, the most hypergamous are also the most superficial.

To circumvent men and make them satisfy their desires rather than theirs, women use seduction, that is to say, a potential access to sex. To strengthen their own relative value and thus their ability to interest partners, they encourage competition between males who see them as a way to assert a status vis-à-vis other men.

Women are only interested in about 20% of men. They are therefore trying to determine which belong to this 20%.

Women are particularly excited to see men compete for each other because it is the simplest and most direct way to measure which of the competitors is stronger physically and psychologically, knowing that this force is not used against them but for them.

In a patriarchal society where the woman is the property of the man, these highly destructive social relations are controlled by the institution of marriage, the subjection of the woman to the man in the legal plane which remains as such an eternal child. In a society where women are freed from the tutelage of the man - in other words, a society in which the sex market is deregulated - female hypergamy is totally unbridled.

Huge masses of men are left on the floor.

This is why it has been shown that polygamous societies - where women are owned by a smaller number of men - are highly vulnerable to civil wars because of the lack of reproductive options for many young males. . This explains, in particular, the Islamic ultra-violence and the compensation of these sexual losers with an imaginary paradise where would await 72 virgins.

It has also been shown that women under 50 are significantly more xenophile than men of the same age: for them, the invader is a new sexual option that strengthens competition between males and increases the relative sexual value of women, in addition to intensifying racial Darwinism.

Women under 50 are less afraid of an invasion because they can provide a reproductive exit with the winners. It is not surprising that, after 50 years, they suddenly join men in their xenophobic tendency: they know that they will be eliminated like the men of their race.
 
this is our last hope, I do not understand why most users of this place waste time in useless thoughts
 
Didnt Read
 
are you seriously 6'10?? gtfo boi
 
our only hope is SEA
lol fuck the east. I give it one or two decades and the east will be as degenerate as the west.
 
not fat from 7in
Hmm so bigger doesn’t mean bigger shlongs although it’s good size I just expected bigger for your height tbh tbh no homo
 
yeah i dont think theres a correlation
Interesting you’re the same size as me but I’m 5’9 I don’t think there is a correlation and you seem really smart so I’ll take your word for it
 
High IQ, well put together post there OP.
 

Similar threads

sociology blackpill
Replies
0
Views
96
sociology blackpill
sociology blackpill
InMemoriam
Replies
7
Views
213
Balding Subhuman
Balding Subhuman
Hoppipolla
Replies
7
Views
301
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
sociology blackpill
Replies
18
Views
447
themang
T
Lapasetjakahvi01
Replies
19
Views
617
worrycel
worrycel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top