I sometimes think the patriarchy was made for men like us to cheat biology(genetic determinism) and nature and be able to thrive. Feminism is trying to take that away.
Nah, it was always shit for incels
. Just a few days ago I looked at the amount of people in the middle ages who never married after being prodded by a post here, and it was pretty wild. A lot of feminists and non-feminists who thinks that a "patriarchal" society guarantees that every man gets married would probably be surprised if they looked into the topic.
. Just a few days ago I looked at the amount of people in the middle ages who never married after being prodded by a post here, and it was pretty wild. A lot of feminists and non-feminists who thinks that a "patriarchal" society guarantees that every man gets married would probably be surprised if they looked into the topic.
No patriarchy for your face
Looksmax.is
Patriarchy is not a thing
chico lachowski profile picture
Muslim countries are probably closest thing to the patriarchy, still benefits mostly richfags and chads
Nah, it was always shit for incels
Of course, but at least patriarchy made the redpill real.Nah, it was always shit for incels
Instead of prettyboy chads getting all the foids, it was the rich and powerful.
Saying anyone can become rich is almost as big as a cope as saying anyone can become chad. However, feeling left out to due to lack of income certainly feels more fair than being left out due to a few milometers of bone. And it is easier to cope with the prospect of future riches than to cope with looksmaxing via surgery (which requires money anyway).
We live in a matriarchal society now
Femshit talking point
I wouldn't say it's either/or, more so that those two groups have recently flipped places a bit.
wdym ? 90% of medieval european men had a virgin wife lolNah, it was always shit for incels
in patriachal society ur face doesnt matter because the women doesnt choose her partner, her father does and the father isnt so he doesnt care about ur face.
Just off the top of my head, three things:
1) Nowhere near that many seem to have even married.
Single women in the Middle Ages - Wikipedia
2) Nobody seems to have really given a shit about unmarried women screwing around. There's a myth heavily pushed by historically-illiterate feminists that in Medieval times, women were punished by law for having sex while unmarried, while men were free to have however much sex they wanted.
This doesn't show up in actual historical sources. 99% of the time an unmarried medieval woman's sexual life was brought up at a court, it was to describe her character while she was judged for another, actual crime, not because of it being a crime itself.
3) In Medieval Europe, it was quite common for young women from poorer families to spend their teens and early/mid-20s as domestic servants for wealthy families (to save up money for a dowry to bring to their marriage and married life), and there's a ton of historical evidence that in a lot of those cases, the men of those families were absolutely fucking these young women under their control in their households.
No.
Fathers choose looks over intelligence when choosing a husband for their daughter (PATRIARCHY WON'T HELP US)
It HAS to be the government assigning women, because if you let fathers choose for their daughter, they will go for looks just like the mother and daughter. Although daughters and their parents rated ambition and intelligence as the most important qualities of a husband for daughters, in the...
incels.is
isnt it a rule to not have chad avis
didnt know i was on looksmax.org LOL
ur coping ur bringing me single women stats lmfao im talking about men.Just off the top of my head, three things:
1) Nowhere near that many seem to have even married.
Single women in the Middle Ages - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
2) Nobody seems to have really given a shit about unmarried women screwing around. There's a myth heavily pushed by historically-illiterate feminists that in Medieval times, women were punished by law for having sex while unmarried, while men were free to have however much sex they wanted.
This doesn't show up in actual historical sources. 99% of the time an unmarried medieval woman's sexual life was brought up at a court, it was to describe her character while she was judged for another, actual crime, not because of it being a crime itself.
3) In Medieval Europe, it was quite common for young women from poorer families to spend their teens and early/mid-20s as domestic servants for wealthy families (to save up money for a dowry to bring to their marriage and married life), and there's a ton of historical evidence that in a lot of those cases, the men of those families were absolutely fucking these young women under their control in their households.
No.
Fathers choose looks over intelligence when choosing a husband for their daughter (PATRIARCHY WON'T HELP US)
It HAS to be the government assigning women, because if you let fathers choose for their daughter, they will go for looks just like the mother and daughter. Although daughters and their parents rated ambition and intelligence as the most important qualities of a husband for daughters, in the...
Just off the top of my head, three things:
1) Nowhere near that many seem to have even married.
Single women in the Middle Ages - Wikipedia
2) Nobody seems to have really given a shit about unmarried women screwing around. There's a myth heavily pushed by historically-illiterate feminists that in Medieval times, women were punished by law for having sex while unmarried, while men were free to have however much sex they wanted.
This doesn't show up in actual historical sources. 99% of the time an unmarried medieval woman's sexual life was brought up at a court, it was to describe her character while she was judged for another, actual crime, not because of it being a crime itself.
3) In Medieval Europe, it was quite common for young women from poorer families to spend their teens and early/mid-20s as domestic servants for wealthy families (to save up money for a dowry to bring to their marriage and married life), and there's a ton of historical evidence that in a lot of those cases, the men of those families were absolutely fucking these young women under their control in their households.
No.
Fathers choose looks over intelligence when choosing a husband for their daughter (PATRIARCHY WON'T HELP US)
It HAS to be the government assigning women, because if you let fathers choose for their daughter, they will go for looks just like the mother and daughter. Although daughters and their parents rated ambition and intelligence as the most important qualities of a husband for daughters, in the...
The Researchgate link is to a study which talks about both men and women, the Wikipedia link just had some succintly written info I could quickly highlight + numbers of single men and women are usually quite good proxies to each other, as there are usually about the same numbers of the two in society and they can only marry each other.
I assume you don't want to move the goalposts, so just to be clear what I meant, I'm mainly reacting to you saying that those foids would be virgins at the time of marriage. About 80% of men marry at some point in their life today as well, but we all know that it's still shit for us and those women by and large aren't virgins when they do so. There's really not that much proof it was too different in Medieval Europe, especially Western Europe. As I mentioned and as the screenshot you posted says as well, those foids, if they married, did so on average in their early/mid-20s, after probably working for a while as domestic servants, and while living in a society that, sure, didn't like sex outside of marriage, but apart from preaching against it, didn't really notably penalize it in any way.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
