No shit, really? And what does that have to do with selective prosecution due to limited resources, and how does this relate to chad's cum dumpster getting welfare for her chadspawn? You seem to have lost the plot of your own argument here.
So you force the pendulum to swing towards anti-fornication laws and enforced stigmas, which will result in a net reduction in sexual degeneracy.
Latin America didn't have a feminist and women's lib movement, as well as a sexual revolution and a supreme court case granting women the right to kill their babies.
You need to look at data on this before 1970, all throughout 1970 up until now, and then for the next 50 years, before you can say if this will have the kind of impact you're suggesting to the degree to which you're suggesting. Right now, it's speculation.
You're just not seeing beyond this turn of events. This statute being overturned won't have the effects you're suggesting in a vacuum. It will have far-reaching cultural ripples that will affect the sexual culture of the following generations to come. The hook-up and tinder fuck-fest culture of today will gradually shift and move away from the current levels of peak degeneracy. Women aren't the only ones who want abortion. Chad and Tyrone obviously want it too, because neither wants to be on the hook for child support or to have their playboy lifestyles in jeopardy.
This hurts foids by bringing back some responsibility to the female side of the equation and makes them think twice about being selfish hedonists. They will still think selfishly because of their careers and money, but now they're more likely to be careful about their sexual choices. They will be more likely to avoid getting rawdogged and creampied if they can help it. The holes who want to get pregnant to exploit the state for resources or to trap men will continue to do so, which means this doesn't change all that much for them.
Overall this will reduce (sexual) degeneracy in society, which is obviously a net gain.
Because the state is ultimately secular and it will make pragmatic decisions for its own interest.
You seem to have a problem with political Conversatism and its religious baggage. I, on the other hand, don't care about either political Conservatism or its religious baggage. You need to take that problem to them and not take that out on me.
Why are you trying to argue from naturalism? That's retarded. Killing your own offspring as a female of a species happens occasionally in nature, but it's not natural. What's natural is to ensure that the offspring survives and carries on the cycle of passing on their DNA.
Whores killing their babies and people looking the other way isn't natural. Calling it "natural" is a category error. Those were the cultural and societal norms in those days, like India and Arabia when they killed babies that were the socially disadvantageous in their given cultures at the times.
And, as I said earlier, this will expose the philosophies and ideologies that are harmful for society and we'll be rid of them. We're already on the path to collapse, btw, so if we can just get everyone to see how harmful things like feminism and unrestrained liberalism can be for society in general before that happens, it will be worth letting society destroy and cannibalize itself.
I don't think he's a troll. I think he genuinely believes that this turn of events will lead to a massive welfare problem in the US (as if bastard children and welfare moms aren't already a big problem KEK) and a huge spike in bastard children.
Don't ruin my fun.