Natural =/= Logical
Its perfectly logical to want to best of something based on functionality, its actual use to you
What can I do with a Lamborghini?, your argument here makes no sense, because the only worth of owning a Lamborghini IS OWNING A LAMBORGHINI, its worth is in it being expensive, but it has no actual use to someone like me, which is why I'd never buy one
I can actually do more with 1,000,000 than I can with 100, your Lamborghini comparison makes no sense, you're falsely conflating "worth more" with "more useful" when it comes to anything, that's not how reality works, you are just an egoist who "wants better than others", what you want has nothing to do with WHAT YOU WANT, it has to do with WHAT OTHERS HAVE
Your entire argument is bullshit reductionist nonsense, expense doesn't determine worth, usefulness does
Would you buy this pen:
A retard like yourself probably would even though you'd have no use for it
Fuck me.... *rolls eyes*
You’re trying to compare a pen to a supercar in order to win an argument.
Look moron, if you don’t understand the concept of value, then there is something wrong with your brain.
Why would I want a lambo instead of a Hyundai?
Let’s see...
> drives really fast with awesome acceleration, which is great fun
> great stereo and interior, comfortable
> looks cool
> turns heads
And at the end of the day, if you don’t want the lambo, you can sell it for a ton of money. Money can be exchanged for other goods and services.
But of course, an educated adult human would be able to realise the point I am making is not unique to cars, houses, or god forbid, pens. These are simple examples I whipped up in 5 seconds.
Even if my argument did merely consist of comparing myself to others (it doesn’t), then that is entirely understandable and is a core part of being an incel and of the blackpill.
Your entire argument boils down to “I don’t want anything more out of life than meets my very basic practical needs for survival”, which is either a blatant lie or reduces you to a chimpanzee swinging through a forest.
Also, your method of debating, much like all your other posts, consists of you making extremely inappropriate and stupid analogies, capitalising certain words, and childish name-calling, all of which remind me of internet flamewars circa 2001. I think I’m done with you.
*dusts off hands and walk away like John Wayne*