How many ethnics are above average (with respect to whites)?
I think that depends on the ethnicity. Even if you told me though, I'd have trouble putting a number on it.
Ethnics are already a minority, and good looking ethnics are minority among minority. Do you understand what I mean?
Yes, if you understand what I mean about the good-looking ones being over-represented in the ones who make it here, because they are either low-inhib enough to sneak in, chad enough to succeed in business and get wealthy and come in legally, or good-looking enough to get sponsored via marriage.
Only ethnic gigachads can slay, as you have said.
I may be fuzzy on what slaying means, I thought perhaps easy and recurring sexual access to prime foids. Though perhaps sometimes said ironically to refer to even occasional (even one-time) sex with low-tier foids.
If it's the former then even sub-slaying sex by chadlite ethnics is still cause of trickle-down interference.
So good looking + high-T ethnics can only survive and others die? Lmfao. Now You have started to argue just for the sake of argument.
No, I'm not saying they're the only survivors, but that I have reason to think they're over-represented among them.
You really think when some drown taking rafts to sneak into Europe that it's the chads drowning and the incels surviving?
You already answered your own question.
Why don't you just do a simple logical deduction?
1. An ethnic gigachad is considered average in the west (as you have said in your previous comment, which is true)
2. Gigachads are above average (ground truth)
3. Ethnics are minority (ground truth)
4. Ethnic gigachads are minority among minority (also a ground truth)
Well, that means an average ethnic should start from 2 (in terms of white people's cale), I guess? What do you think?
I don't think I agreed with point 1 but rather proposed it as a possibility for sake of argument. You'll find I am generally confused by specific numerical assignments and approach it very tentatively.
"Minority" is merely <50% so it could be as big as 40%, 0.4*0.4=0.16 and 16% is a big number. So you need to find a more impressive word than minority if you want to make ethnics/chads seem small potatoes.
As you have already mentioned, ethnic gigachads can pose a problem, but again gigachads are rare. So basically it means some extremely rare ethnic gigachads are taking all "your white kweens"? Does this really make any sense?
Depends on what you mean by "extremely".
Ethnic-specific chads/gigachads (9/10) probably function as chadlites (7/8) in the average population, but I don't think chadlites are necessarily our problem because chadlites (even though their standards are lower than gigachads) still probably do have standards against fucking rank 1-3 girls who want to fuck them.
The greater problem would be ethnic-specific chadlites who function as rank 5-6 in the general population. There are more chadlites than gigachads, and these ones would be willing to fuck the rank 1-3s who we might want to date.
Fix your whores, 90% of your problems will be solved, which I explained later.
You ever make soup?
Cut up the meat, vegetables, broth, cook it up for a few hours?
You ever try to UNmake soup?
Also using the above argument, average ethnics are not a problem. If you say otherwise, you need to restart the entire conversation.
A rank-6 ethnic could function as a rank-4 white, filling up the top tier of the incel shelves who JUST might have some slim chances of relationship without this.
Every white can get ethnic whore, if he's not morbidly obese. Even a short guy with literal manboobs from this forum got a cracker whore.
The problem is the gender imbalance. I wouldn't be mad if it was 90% foid refugees because that would give us more opportunities.
But it's mostly guys:
https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/five-explanations-to-why-the-majority-of-refugees/
Just as young men are most likely to make the trip, the chads are more likely to make it than the incels.
Incels know this, so they're less motivated to try in the first place. Especially since they know they're too ugly to take advantage of western sluts.
So please enough of the "poor ethnic incel immigrants" because THEY are the minority, the majority is chad ethnic immigrants flooding our middle tier.
Now you are saying some starving ethnics from a war torn middle-easrtern country are taller than European descendants? Why don't you look up some world height stats?
Height isn't everything, I got mogged by ethnic guys shorted than me in HS.
Yup. If you want to argue it's lower-priority than face/skin/height that's fine (I doubt we'll ever get broad consensus on how to order factors) but it can't be discounted.
The personality issue has never been that foids value GOOD personality, they value confident/asshole personality. They often assume it's based on something real even if it isn't. Like the guy's some kind of knife-wielding drug dealer in a secret life who can kill her enemies, if he expresses confidence and approaches.
That's obviously not the only or even the primary factor, but it does allow ethnics to edge out close competition.
How do you pretend to become rich? Lmfao.
You rack up a bunch of loans and credit card debt and buy expensive clothing and cars and obscure your financial status.
So now you are saying a group of immigrants can amass money in no time, then why they still live in ghettos?
Yes, that's what organized crime and welfare help with.
The only ethnic high-earning groups are curry and rice. Yes there are some Arabs, but again, they are still a minority. Now "rich Arab immigrant gigachad" is like a dodo bird. I seriously doubt such thing exists.
Hell, why does he even have to be rich?
Here we have a guy whose facial structure is probably like 7/10 in white terms which makes him rank 5 or 6 when competing with whites, and he's able to land a 4/10 foid an incel might otherwise find some cope with.
I was not talking about you, I was talking about average ethnics pulling off women with those PUA bs like approaching thousands of foids obnoxiously, weaseling up to them by talking about your refugeeism, etc.
Or maybe not even refugeeism, just implying the stress of cultural adaptation.
If we look at guys like Roosh that's probably the type of shit he's tried. "It's tough to be persian", etc.
I am not very conversant about Taqiyya (although I'm a Hafeez myself), but looks like you know more than me. Lmfao.
Or so you say...
I know. I was just trying to say men don't need inspiration from some books to fuck. Sex is a basic biological need.
I find that a confusing expression. "Basic" is vague.
Oxygen/Water/Food are for example what I would term "metabolic needs". I like that expression because it gives context to "needs A for B".
Unless we know what something is needed FOR (a reagent) I don't think we should think of it as a need.
Love/Sex seem like potential reagents for happiness and psychological wellbeing. That said I'm not sure they're absolute ones. Perhaps if we defined specific types of happiness.
Using metabolism though, I could actually highlight that you DON'T need oxygen to produce energy. We do after all have an anaerobic energy system which can produce energy for brief periods when there is a lack of oxygen.
That said: you can't rely on that indefinitely before it fucks you up.
Obviously we can survive longer without sex than without oxygen, but I bring up the comparison that sex could be a higher-tier form of happiness production (similar to oxygen) and our copes could be like anaerobic glycolysis, something to get us by, but not efficient and causing health problems if relied upon too long, even though obviously not as immediately traumatic as oxygen deprivation.
Whatever. Free-whoring? "Slutting" should be the right term I guess, both are same to me.
So long as we acknowledge that it's only situationally slutting because we dislike the chad they're fucking and few him as a scummy person she should have morality-standards to reject for us.
I do wonder if we could find something better to explain ourselves though, given the vague subjectivity of who is scum and who isn't. Foids reading this for example may simply think "no, you incels are scummy, we would be sluts if we fucked YOU" and "chad is better, it's not slutty to fuck prime meat".
What's our counter-argument to this? "Nuh-uh?" I know we have a point, and we could probably explain it in paragraph-long dissection, but what I'm aspiring to do is perhaps find a means of summarizing this and putting a more descriptive label on it with decent etymological origins.
Like for example, rather than condemning all chads, if we specify specific types of chads who predominate the chad population, like chads who are sadists and who bully incels and have no empathy for less attractive men. I remember the term 'psychopath' being used earlier this week in the chat for someone, so that's one possible etymological ingredient. Another would be sociopathy... but we should ideally brainstorm a lot of potentials here, maybe even combine them into some kind of acronym.
Yes there might some competitors, but the number is too small to shove out the majority (white + average).
You don't need to shove out the entire majority, just SOME of them. It trickles down.
Cut all these bs, I simply don't understand this fact that why you keep whiteknighting for your women even though you clearly know they want you fucking dead?
I think it's because I see their psychology as pliable. Without the flood of mostly-male mostly-chad ethnics, the chemistry of mass psychology might result in them being slightly less enthusiastic about wanting me dead, which could make life easier to cope with.
This is what I have noticed, many posters on this forum don't want to see any fault in their women and somehow they are convinced that immigrant ethnics are turning them into cum gobbling sluts.
I don't take a single-cause approach, I do hold them accountable but I also hold the simps, ethnichads and jews accountable too.
Is this some sort of conspiracy/brainwashing done by the same group of people who want your women to be dog-fucker whores? I think we should look into that.
Denying female accountability is definitely one of (((their))) strategies, but I don't think I'm doing that merely by acknowledging added causes and culprits contributing to a big picture.
Now you have moved to a completely different issue. Also no, all jails in the west are teeming with ethnics, whites are minority there.
I mean proportionate to the amount of crimes that whites commit.
Stuff like
https://nypost.com/2016/01/10/europe-is-enabling-a-rape-culture/ has two halves to it, for example.
Yes there are a bunch of slutty Beckies out there trying to get groped by ethnichads, but there are also actual unwanted molesters too, who get away with it because of the 'can't criticize the ethnics' bullshit in liberal politics. White guys of similar rank wouldn't get that tolerance. They know that, so they choose to be higher-inhib.
That same propensity to being low-inhib (knowing they're not likely to get prosecuted) in turn makes them more attractive to the white women they're groping, leading to more consent received for it, with women perhaps only claiming molestation if there's pic evidence of their slutdom revealed on phone pics spread around.
Anyway, we ethnics want ourself out more than you want us to. We come to your land just for money and try to get as much as we can. Just like your people plundered all our resources for 800 years. And also no, we didn't enjoy leaving our homeland.
I think perhaps you're getting overly specific regarding 800 years and "ethnics" in general. Different countries had differing amounts of resources plundered by colonists over different time periods.
Furthermore, different portions of different nations ran those colonial shows.
I imagine there are mixed feelings about leaving homelands, depending on the state it was in when someone left, and where they relocated.
And lied about it.
www.aljazeera.com
This for example is more useful, Hindustan v. Britain. Sorry about having your nation chopped in half (Pakistan) due to muslim invaders BTW. I guess the Brits were 100% to blame for that too and not because you guys were killing each other and they were trying to stop it via the bisection. There was a sad Dr. Who episode about that and it was central to a movie I watched about your Olympics as well.
I personally don't agree with immigration and race mixing. Every group of people belong to their geographical origins and they are supposed to stay with their own people and culture. In the same way all whites should move back to Europe as well. This is the only fair arrangement.
This meme is actually slightly inaccurate, the Solutreans who were murdered by the Beringians predated viking culture.
