I
idfklma
Banned
-
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2023
- Posts
- 2,816
Now and Then has been hyped up as the last Beatles song and after having listened to it i dont think it should have been released. Its a mid song. Its boring. Its nothing special. There are very few interesting parts in it.
It started as a demo by John Lennon, only him and the paino, and it sounds ok, but there's a reason why he never released it - because it never went anywhere, he had a bit of it, but no chorus, no bridge, nothing special at all, just a mid little quiet sombre piano song, and thats why John abandoned it.
Now 50 years later Paul adds a chorus to it and a string ending, and it sucks, he released it for sentimental value - "Now and Then" to remember the glory days, and to add to the Beatles legacy - releasing a song that was originally a demo posthumously decades after the demo was made.
Unfortunately, i think this is a bit of a blemish on the Beatles instead of what Paul intended - its just not a good song. The Beatles ended off perfectly with Let it Be, a great album, The End was a good ending song, there should have been nothing after that.
Now Paul releases this mid composition decades later to try to relive his hayday a bit. If it were back then the Beatles would have never have released it as its just not up to the Beatles standard at all. Very mid song. Unfortunate that Paul insisted on releasing it. Its not a good song, and it does not do any service to the great legacy that is The Beatles.
It started as a demo by John Lennon, only him and the paino, and it sounds ok, but there's a reason why he never released it - because it never went anywhere, he had a bit of it, but no chorus, no bridge, nothing special at all, just a mid little quiet sombre piano song, and thats why John abandoned it.
Now 50 years later Paul adds a chorus to it and a string ending, and it sucks, he released it for sentimental value - "Now and Then" to remember the glory days, and to add to the Beatles legacy - releasing a song that was originally a demo posthumously decades after the demo was made.
Unfortunately, i think this is a bit of a blemish on the Beatles instead of what Paul intended - its just not a good song. The Beatles ended off perfectly with Let it Be, a great album, The End was a good ending song, there should have been nothing after that.
Now Paul releases this mid composition decades later to try to relive his hayday a bit. If it were back then the Beatles would have never have released it as its just not up to the Beatles standard at all. Very mid song. Unfortunate that Paul insisted on releasing it. Its not a good song, and it does not do any service to the great legacy that is The Beatles.





