ProudIncelistani
Son of Incelistan
-
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2018
- Posts
- 4,301
https://www.independent.co.uk/voice...hile-dark-web-congress-virginia-a8384391.html
Let me break it down for you:
Is he real?
Yes!
Is he retarded?
Yes!
Is he Incel?
NO!
He has married TWICE, has had a biological daughter, (hence not AT ALL INCEL) supports White Supremacy (Opposite of Incel Ideology), and while what he says is terrible (everything except the "misogynist" part), there is not any proof of him supporting Incels at all. That's the truth.
Within the article, some '''evidence''' of him supporting Incels would be this Lookism.net post:
They claim that that is him on Lookism.net talking about child porn, when in reality a good stroll and scavenger hunt across Lookism.net will indicate that the post doesn't even exist! In fact, it's likely the writer doesn't even exist!
How do I know?
Because I've searched for the post first hand and I've got NO results at all for anything remotely similar to that. Nothing. There are no links they provide to this Lookism.net post, they just show some random non-existent post and expect the public to buy this bull.
But how do I know that the writer doesn't exist either?
Simple. Let's look at the pictures again. Let's look at when his account popped into alleged existence. It is alleged that it was in Feb 2018, and at that time, he was a 7-star administrator. Common logic dictates that from then until now, his rank could have either remained the same or it could have risen. A quick look in https://lookism.net/memberlist.php shows that NO one with his descriptor (Feb 2018 creation date, 7 star admin or above) even exists!
They don't even provide links to this, so how do they expect to back their arguments up?
What BS is foreign media even trying to pull off here? Sounds like scapegoating to me, and we all know which German Leader was famous for that... :think::think::think::think::think:
Let me break it down for you:
Is he real?
Yes!
Is he retarded?
Yes!
Is he Incel?
NO!
He has married TWICE, has had a biological daughter, (hence not AT ALL INCEL) supports White Supremacy (Opposite of Incel Ideology), and while what he says is terrible (everything except the "misogynist" part), there is not any proof of him supporting Incels at all. That's the truth.
Within the article, some '''evidence''' of him supporting Incels would be this Lookism.net post:
They claim that that is him on Lookism.net talking about child porn, when in reality a good stroll and scavenger hunt across Lookism.net will indicate that the post doesn't even exist! In fact, it's likely the writer doesn't even exist!
How do I know?
Because I've searched for the post first hand and I've got NO results at all for anything remotely similar to that. Nothing. There are no links they provide to this Lookism.net post, they just show some random non-existent post and expect the public to buy this bull.
But how do I know that the writer doesn't exist either?
Simple. Let's look at the pictures again. Let's look at when his account popped into alleged existence. It is alleged that it was in Feb 2018, and at that time, he was a 7-star administrator. Common logic dictates that from then until now, his rank could have either remained the same or it could have risen. A quick look in https://lookism.net/memberlist.php shows that NO one with his descriptor (Feb 2018 creation date, 7 star admin or above) even exists!
They don't even provide links to this, so how do they expect to back their arguments up?
What BS is foreign media even trying to pull off here? Sounds like scapegoating to me, and we all know which German Leader was famous for that... :think::think::think::think::think:
Last edited: