Both in the first world and third world, the post WW2 period marked by advancements in food production, healthcare, housing, and geopolitical stability which gave rise to new rules of engagement that established social stability though clean daily routines, low risk, high trust behaviors and low inequality/hierarchy which emphasized civility, orderliness, lack of competition, suppression of women's rights, and upholding of workers' rights.
These policies gave rise to a golden age of sorts for subhumans because unlike at most other times in history, they could enjoy a basic standard of prosperity with clean living conditions, consistent diet, and a huge level of safety. Now if you observe some blackpill stuff at gyms, sports arenas, bars, and nightclubs today, we see a complete contrast, because across bars and gyms we have laissez faire competition where only the genetically gifted, privileged, and elite succeed unlike in prior decades of high trust where practically anyone including subhumans could expect to succeed in courtship and procreation.
If you contrast post-WW2 high trust low-threat social order with how evolution takes place in the wild, we see a similar contrast. For most species, its unnatural to live in comfort and safety because in the wild without any selection pressure, nothing can be taken for granted and the competition for survival and mating is constant, at least with most species. And the species that are the apex predators are the ones who thrive while the rest of the weaker species cower in fear of them. We also see endless arms races and one-uping strategies which males and females apply upon each other to assert their biological imperative over the other, as if they are mutually antagonistic, which is in complete violation of the picture perfect nuclear family that was upheld in the post-WW2 years. Such kind of monogamy exists only among species which are not sexually dimorphic, but the problem is, as humans, we now prize sexiness and attractiveness more than anything, so is it any wonder why we get anything other than brutal low trust meat-grinding competition?
These policies gave rise to a golden age of sorts for subhumans because unlike at most other times in history, they could enjoy a basic standard of prosperity with clean living conditions, consistent diet, and a huge level of safety. Now if you observe some blackpill stuff at gyms, sports arenas, bars, and nightclubs today, we see a complete contrast, because across bars and gyms we have laissez faire competition where only the genetically gifted, privileged, and elite succeed unlike in prior decades of high trust where practically anyone including subhumans could expect to succeed in courtship and procreation.
If you contrast post-WW2 high trust low-threat social order with how evolution takes place in the wild, we see a similar contrast. For most species, its unnatural to live in comfort and safety because in the wild without any selection pressure, nothing can be taken for granted and the competition for survival and mating is constant, at least with most species. And the species that are the apex predators are the ones who thrive while the rest of the weaker species cower in fear of them. We also see endless arms races and one-uping strategies which males and females apply upon each other to assert their biological imperative over the other, as if they are mutually antagonistic, which is in complete violation of the picture perfect nuclear family that was upheld in the post-WW2 years. Such kind of monogamy exists only among species which are not sexually dimorphic, but the problem is, as humans, we now prize sexiness and attractiveness more than anything, so is it any wonder why we get anything other than brutal low trust meat-grinding competition?
Last edited:
