Blackpill The Mathematical Proof Framework of Consent

[SlayerSlayer]

Consent has mathematical depth

it's not enough that people have a basic addition and subtraction understanding of consent, it's not as binary as "yes" means "yes" and "no" means "no." We need to go further as autists and understand consent as a mathematical proof:

For an interaction I between two individuals A and B, true consent C exists if and only if it satisfies the conditions of safety, autonomy, and mutual affirmation.

Definitions:​

1. Consent (C): A state where an individual willingly agrees to an interaction without coercion, pressure, or impairment.
2. Safety (S): A condition where the individual feels physically, emotionally, socially, and legally secure.
3. Autonomy (A): The ability to make decisions free from manipulation, obligation, or external control.
4. Mutual Affirmation (M): A reciprocal, enthusiastic, and clearly communicated agreement.

Axioms:​

1. Necessity of Safety:
   S⇒CS
   If safety is not present, then consent cannot exist.
2. Necessity of Autonomy:
   A⇒CA
   If autonomy is compromised, then consent is invalid.
3. Necessity of Mutual Affirmation:
   M⇒CM
   If both parties do not clearly express their agreement, consent does not hold.
4. The Ongoing Nature of Consent:
   C(t)⇒C(t+Δt)
   Consent is not static; it must persist throughout the interaction and remain revocable at any time.

Proof:​

To establish that true consent C exists, we must prove that the necessary conditions S, A, and M are all satisfied.

1. Assume that consent C is valid.
2. By the axioms, consent implies the presence of S, A, and M.C⇒(S∧A∧M)
3. Conversely, if S, A, and M hold, then consent is present.(S∧A∧M)⇒C
4. Therefore, consent exists if and only if all three conditions are satisfied:C  ⟺  (S∧A∧M)

Since consent is an ongoing function of time, it must be continuously evaluated. If at any point, one of the conditions S, A, or M ceases to hold, then consent is revoked:

¬S∨¬A∨¬M⇒¬C
Thus, any violation of safety, autonomy, or mutual affirmation invalidates consent.

Conclusion:​

Consent is a logical construct that relies on multiple interdependent conditions. It is not a singular event but an ongoing state requiring continuous affirmation. The failure of any one component—safety, autonomy, or mutual affirmation—renders consent null.

Just as a mathematical proof must be both necessary and sufficient, so too must consent meet all its conditions without compromise. Use the four axioms to your hearts content. for I have mathematically proven it's over.

 

[PersonalityChad]

No consent for my face

 

[Diddy]

How long did it take for you to come up with this, including the other thread you recently made?

 

[SlayerSlayer]

No consent for my face

AXIOM 1:

Necessity of Safety:
S⇒CS
If safety is not present, then consent cannot exist.

YOUR FACE IS UNSAFE TO WOMEN

 

[SlayerSlayer]

How long did it take for you to come up with this, including the other thread you recently made?

it took me my entire life

 

[veryrare]

Ok nigga just write a fucking book on Consent at this point

 

[SlayerSlayer]

Ok nigga just write a fucking book on Consent at this point

I think I should, but I don't want just incels to read it, I want feminists to read it and agree with my model of consent having no idea that an incel wrote this shit

 

[Skelly]

this isnt must-read material lil bro

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

this isnt must-read material lil bro

 

[SupremeAutist]

this isnt must-read material lil bro

They should make a new subforum called must-not-read

 

[Wok22]

Consent has mathematical depth

it's not enough that people have a basic addition and subtraction understanding of consent, it's not as binary as "yes" means "yes" and "no" means "no." We need to go further as autists and understand consent as a mathematical proof:

For an interaction I between two individuals A and B, true consent C exists if and only if it satisfies the conditions of safety, autonomy, and mutual affirmation.

Definitions:​

1. Consent (C): A state where an individual willingly agrees to an interaction without coercion, pressure, or impairment.
2. Safety (S): A condition where the individual feels physically, emotionally, socially, and legally secure.
3. Autonomy (A): The ability to make decisions free from manipulation, obligation, or external control.
4. Mutual Affirmation (M): A reciprocal, enthusiastic, and clearly communicated agreement.

Axioms:​

1. Necessity of Safety:
   S⇒CS
   If safety is not present, then consent cannot exist.
2. Necessity of Autonomy:
   A⇒CA
   If autonomy is compromised, then consent is invalid.
3. Necessity of Mutual Affirmation:
   M⇒CM
   If both parties do not clearly express their agreement, consent does not hold.
4. The Ongoing Nature of Consent:
   C(t)⇒C(t+Δt)
   Consent is not static; it must persist throughout the interaction and remain revocable at any time.

Proof:​

To establish that true consent C exists, we must prove that the necessary conditions S, A, and M are all satisfied.

1. Assume that consent C is valid.
2. By the axioms, consent implies the presence of S, A, and M.C⇒(S∧A∧M)
3. Conversely, if S, A, and M hold, then consent is present.(S∧A∧M)⇒C
4. Therefore, consent exists if and only if all three conditions are satisfied:C  ⟺  (S∧A∧M)

Since consent is an ongoing function of time, it must be continuously evaluated. If at any point, one of the conditions S, A, or M ceases to hold, then consent is revoked:

¬S∨¬A∨¬M⇒¬C
Thus, any violation of safety, autonomy, or mutual affirmation invalidates consent.

Conclusion:​

Consent is a logical construct that relies on multiple interdependent conditions. It is not a singular event but an ongoing state requiring continuous affirmation. The failure of any one component—safety, autonomy, or mutual affirmation—renders consent null.

Just as a mathematical proof must be both necessary and sufficient, so too must consent meet all its conditions without compromise. Use the four axioms to your hearts content. for I have mathematically proven it's over.

this nigga, i swear... I cringed so hard reading this.

 

[Fortress Resolution]

No consent for my face

 

[Diddy]

this isnt must-read material lil bro

To be fair, a lot of threads here aren't must-read worthy.

 

[coolguy1488]

Whats up with you and consent. You got something to tell us?

 

[based_meme]

this nigga, i swear... I cringed so hard reading this.

That's the idea, Isaac Newton. It's not seriously meant for us. JFL

 

[ogercel]

OP although this’ impressive you badly need pussy.

 

[based_meme]

OP although this’ impressive you badly need pussy.

No shit, we all do. You're forgetting where we are? Sus.

Whats up with you and consent. You got something to tell us?

Never began for low IQ cels.

 

[ogercel]

Easy brocel I’m an Escortcel he just needs to go to Chinese massage parlour once a month.

No shit, we all do. You're forgetting where we are? Sus.

 

[based_meme]

Easy brocel I’m an Escortcel he just needs to go to Chinese massage parlour once a month.

Shit, why didn't any of us think of that? Just fuck a hooker theory.

Getting a prostitute to unload your balls isn't going to fix the years of damage that being incel is going to do to your psychological well-being. Many of us have stunted and arrested developments from missing out on things like teen love - you know, milestones in life.

Bro is literally over 40 and KHHV (he's not the only one ). A professional whore is not going to fix anyone's inceldom.

 

[ogercel]

Shit, why didn't any of us think of that? Just fuck a hooker theory.

Getting a prostitute to unload your balls isn't going to fix the years of damage that being incel is going to do to your psychological well-being. Many of us have stunted and arrested developments from missing out on things like teen love - you know, milestones in life.

Bro is literally over 40 and KHHV (he's not the only one ). A professional whore is not going to fix anyone inceldom.

True true but it’s better than nothing

 

[CuntHater]

No consent for my face

Just rape

 

[PersonalityChad]

Just rape

 

[To koniec]

To be fair, a lot of threads here aren't must-read worthy.

https://incels.is/threads/this-world-is-a-hell-realm.706938/


https://incels.is/threads/violinist-ziyu-he-the-gigachink.644247/

Like bro, what it's even doin here

Desperate attention for pinned thread
Second is kinda debatable, but i think it was just slayerslayer egocentrism, like bro there are gorillion subhumans in entire world, if i made thread about him...

...would be also worth of pinned ?

Mostly @WorthlessSlavicShit is quality content creator here with occasionally @DarkStar also creating worthy of read threads

@KillNiggers

 

[KillNiggers]

https://incels.is/threads/this-world-is-a-hell-realm.706938/


https://incels.is/threads/violinist-ziyu-he-the-gigachink.644247/

Like bro, what it's even doin here

Desperate attention for pinned thread
Second is kinda debatable, but i think it was just slayerslayer egocentrism, like bro there are gorillion subhumans in entire world, if i made thread about him...

View attachment 1398638View attachment 1398639

...would be also worth of pinned ?

Mostly @WorthlessSlavicShit is quality content creator here with occasionally @DarkStar also creating worthy of read threads

@KillNiggers

I don't understand how first one is related to inceldom. It's just anti-natalism/philosophy

 

[To koniec]

I don't understand how first one is related to inceldom. It's just anti-natalism/philosophy

Eh it's somewhat related cause anti natilism and cosmic pessimism are somewhat related but it's not pinworthy

it's just @SuperKanga.Belgrade craving attention ( daily reminder that he recently threatened to end his life or leave forum just to comeback same day )

 

[KillNiggers]

Eh it's somewhat related cause anti natilism and cosmic pessimism are somewhat related but it's not pinworthy

it's just @SuperKanga.Belgrade craving attention ( daily reminder that he recently threatened to end his life or leave forum just to comeback same day )

The problem comes with the fact that a lot of toilets think like that too kek

 

[To koniec]

The problem comes with the fact that a lot of toilets think like that too kek

Real blackpill about this forum is that incels don't differ that much from normies or foids including both of us, we are just animals, everybody is same

 

[SuperKanga.Belgrade]

Eh it's somewhat related cause anti natilism and cosmic pessimism are somewhat related but it's not pinworthy

it's just @SuperKanga.Belgrade craving attention ( daily reminder that he recently threatened to end his life or leave forum just to comeback same day )

Don't understand why people love seeing others going through a hard time. Must make them feel special.

 

[To koniec]

Don't understand why people love seeing others going through a hard time. Must make them feel special.

I don't love seeing others going through hard time cause you faked it like coming back same day ?

 

[SuperKanga.Belgrade]

I don't love seeing others going through hard time cause you faked it like coming back same day ?

Whatever man, think whatever you want.

 

[unborndegenerate]

this is crazy man, I can`t stop laughing

 

[based_meme]

this is crazy man, I can`t stop laughing

It's pure, unadulterated KEK fuel that truly highlights how absurd the concept of consent can be with how these "rape culture" and other weirdos change it to suit their whims.

 

[unborndegenerate]

It's pure, unadulterated KEK fuel that truly highlights how absurd the concept of consent can be with how these "rape culture" and other weirdos change it to suit their whims.

yea, for me rape is sinful in every way and should be punishable for the rapist if proven guilty. Otherwise both of them should be punished publicly with 100 lashes. Btw marital rape doesn't exist.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

It's pure, unadulterated KEK fuel that truly highlights how absurd the concept of consent can be with how these "rape culture" and other weirdos change it to suit their whims.

it's also makes me think about how governments and democracies are literally built to be cockblocking cesspools where nothing gets done. We have three branches of government in the US, but with vaginas, we have 4 shifting axioms that could kill our chances, though as incels not only are we stuck at axiom 1, we don't even talk or imagine the third order consequences of the other 3. That's why the proof sounds so absurd to us.

The other three axioms are "post-ascension" anxieties. Even when you nut in a vagina, you're not in the clear. And all of these axioms actively compete against each other further preventing true consent.

The idea and hope of fostering true ongoing consent that persists until the foid dies is as likely as a man getting at least a 5% raise every year until the day you retire at 75.

IT ALSO ANGERS THE FUCK OUT OF ME, that we allot this much consent to vaginas, when for most things be it companies, governments, employers, friends, family, etc, consistently violate similar boundaries but are allotted far less shame and trauma response

 

[Nigger Burger]

I hate mathematical proofs with a passion, had to pass a course on them in uni with a barely passable grade

 

[Verxis]

Consent has mathematical depth

it's not enough that people have a basic addition and subtraction understanding of consent, it's not as binary as "yes" means "yes" and "no" means "no." We need to go further as autists and understand consent as a mathematical proof:

For an interaction I between two individuals A and B, true consent C exists if and only if it satisfies the conditions of safety, autonomy, and mutual affirmation.

Definitions:​

1. Consent (C): A state where an individual willingly agrees to an interaction without coercion, pressure, or impairment.
2. Safety (S): A condition where the individual feels physically, emotionally, socially, and legally secure.
3. Autonomy (A): The ability to make decisions free from manipulation, obligation, or external control.
4. Mutual Affirmation (M): A reciprocal, enthusiastic, and clearly communicated agreement.

Axioms:​

1. Necessity of Safety:
   S⇒CS
   If safety is not present, then consent cannot exist.
2. Necessity of Autonomy:
   A⇒CA
   If autonomy is compromised, then consent is invalid.
3. Necessity of Mutual Affirmation:
   M⇒CM
   If both parties do not clearly express their agreement, consent does not hold.
4. The Ongoing Nature of Consent:
   C(t)⇒C(t+Δt)
   Consent is not static; it must persist throughout the interaction and remain revocable at any time.

Proof:​

To establish that true consent C exists, we must prove that the necessary conditions S, A, and M are all satisfied.

1. Assume that consent C is valid.
2. By the axioms, consent implies the presence of S, A, and M.C⇒(S∧A∧M)
3. Conversely, if S, A, and M hold, then consent is present.(S∧A∧M)⇒C
4. Therefore, consent exists if and only if all three conditions are satisfied:C  ⟺  (S∧A∧M)

Since consent is an ongoing function of time, it must be continuously evaluated. If at any point, one of the conditions S, A, or M ceases to hold, then consent is revoked:

¬S∨¬A∨¬M⇒¬C
Thus, any violation of safety, autonomy, or mutual affirmation invalidates consent.

Conclusion:​

Consent is a logical construct that relies on multiple interdependent conditions. It is not a singular event but an ongoing state requiring continuous affirmation. The failure of any one component—safety, autonomy, or mutual affirmation—renders consent null.

Just as a mathematical proof must be both necessary and sufficient, so too must consent meet all its conditions without compromise. Use the four axioms to your hearts content. for I have mathematically proven it's over.

Issue: Axiom 1 is flawed.
Justification: Whether someone "feels" safe is too nebulous a term to quantify and glean any useful data from. Blackedfags and rapebait sluts intentionally get off from the danger they're in. Bugchasers for an extreme example.
Also: When you introduce even more nebulous concepts such as manipulation, coercion, and mutual affirmation, there's a flaw that's baked into the framework.
Case in point: A slut is promiscuous because of some trauma she retained as a child. She consents to sex, and the average normie would say that she has autonomy, but when you examine similar cases reacting the same way, you quickly begin to realize that females have no real autonomy. Foids are slaves to their material conditions.

 

[SlayerSlayer]

Issue: Axiom 1 is flawed.
Justification: Whether someone "feels" safe is too nebulous a term to quantify and glean any useful data from. Blackedfags and rapebait sluts intentionally get off from the danger they're in. Bugchasers for an extreme example.
Also: When you introduce even more nebulous concepts such as manipulation, coercion, and mutual affirmation, there's a flaw that's baked into the framework.
Case in point: A slut is promiscuous because of some trauma she retained as a child. She consents to sex, and the average normie would say that she has autonomy, but when you examine similar cases reacting the same way, you quickly begin to realize that females have no real autonomy. Foids are slaves to their material conditions.

cope axiom 1 is the unbeatable card foids always have, you are right that it's flawed-- but it's flawed FOR YOU, not her.

THE ONLY WAY TO GUARANTEE SAFETY IS NOT LEAVING YOUR ROOM

 

[Solid]

Shouldve just pinned the thread in inceldom discussed rather than moving it here

 

[based_meme]

I hate mathematical proofs with a passion, had to pass a course on them in uni with a barely passable grade

Some proofs are hard to do, some are hard to understand, but most are straightforward. It's just mostly deductive logic. Know your definitions and go through the methods.

 

[Ahnfeltia]

must-read

 

[Verxis]

cope axiom 1 is the unbeatable card foids always have, you are right that it's flawed-- but it's flawed FOR YOU, not her.

THE ONLY WAY TO GUARANTEE SAFETY IS NOT LEAVING YOUR ROOM

Oh, it's flawed for her, too. Foids can't be trusted with the power to change their minds. She will use to to destroy every relationship in her life. Just look at how they flee like rats from "strict" fathers in search of some nebulous ideal of autonomy, only to end up fucking dogs on camera in the basement of a quirked up semitic nigga.

 

[Antorian]

I DO NOT CONSENT TO READ NORMIE BABBLING

 

[sexualeconomist]

High IQ post

 

[based_meme]

Oh, it's flawed for her, too. Foids can't be trusted with the power to change their minds. She will use to to destroy every relationship in her life. Just look at how they flee like rats from "strict" fathers in search of some nebulous ideal of autonomy, only to end up fucking dogs on camera in the basement of a quirked up semitic nigga.

You're missing the point of the thread, brocel. It doesn't matter what's true and what's false. It doesn't matter what makes sense and what doesn't. It doesn't even matter if it's consistent and logical.

What matters is how she feels about it any given moment. That's what's true and that's what's reality for any woman. And that is why the entire concept becomes patently absurd and why the whole thing is a joke. The simple fact that a woman can retroactively withdraw consent at any point in time is a thing that some of these holes legitimately believe can happen and should hold.

This thread does what James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian did with their grievance studies papers, albeit on a comparably much smaller scale. They expertly trolled all of these feminist and gender studies people to illustrate how ridiculous it all is.

 

[universallyabhorres]

YOUR FACE IS UNSAFE TO WOMEN

That explains why women give distance or speed up and walk away after seeing my face.

 

[HomicidalSuicidal88]

 

[Solid]

I just downvoted your comment.

FAQ​

What does this mean?​

The amount of karma (points) on your comment and Reddit account has decreased by one.

Why did you do this?​

There are several reasons I may deem a comment to be unworthy of positive or neutral karma. These include, but are not limited to:

• Rudeness towards other Redditors,
• Spreading incorrect information,
• Sarcasm not correctly flagged with a /s.

Am I banned from the Reddit?​

No - not yet. But you should refrain from making comments like this in the future. Otherwise I will be forced to issue an additional downvote, which may put your commenting and posting privileges in jeopardy.

I don't believe my comment deserved a downvote. Can you un-downvote it?​

Sure, mistakes happen. But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I undo a downvote. If you would like to issue an appeal, shoot me a private message explaining what I got wrong. I tend to respond to Reddit PMs within several minutes. Do note, however, that over 99.9% of downvote appeals are rejected, and yours is likely no exception.

How can I prevent this from happening in the future?​

Accept the downvote and move on. But learn from this mistake: your behavior will not be tolerated on Reddit.com. I will continue to issue downvotes until you improve your conduct. Remember: Reddit is privilege, not a right.

 

[92 drowsiness?]

Chad rapes and its okay.