Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The main reason billionaires and global corporations all support feminism and simp for roasties

Lv99_BixNood

Lv99_BixNood

fascel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Posts
17,086
W*men are much more easily influenced by advertisements (or any propaganda really) and spend more money on consumer goods. Whereas men tend to save or invest their money, w*men consoom. So all the billions over billions that are spent by governments to "empower women", getting them into high paying STEM jobs, giving them tax cuts and whatnot, where is it ultimately going? Into Schlomo's pocket as he laughs at the dumb shiksas buying his overpriced brand articles.

Feminism is just another tool to make the rich even richer, ironically supported by the same useful idiots (hello inceltear commies) who cry for a socialist revolution and for "taxing the rich" jfl.
 
Also most men's money goes to foids as well (either willingly or through taxation)
 
Also most men's money goes to foids as well (either willingly or through taxation)
High taxes also only benefit the rich since they're not the ones paying them jfl. Every billionaire has his money parked elsewhere.
 
Feminism is just another tool to make the rich even richer, ironically supported by the same useful idiots (hello inceltear commies) who cry for a socialist revolution and for "taxing the rich" jfl.
:feelsYall:
 
Yep, it's also the reason they supported women's liberation so they could have more mindless workers to drive down wages and increase there own profits.
JFL at any commietards that support feminism when it's literally a tool meant to suppress the worker.
 
The problem is women are inherently more satisfied through the financial value (or should I say lack of a deficite unlike men) and protection it offers. Once we properly asessed its value and the negative male negative starting balance and socialze this cost among women (or like in the past men start redistributing women directly), they quickly become unsatisfied as well. So in a sense we are always at odds with the system's financial elite and women as they directly have to collectively as a sex pay for our incelness in one or the other way. They are inherently labor aristocracy and often class traitors in liberalism by birth. A fact you have to keep in mind as a commiecel, even as a feminist one.
 
Last edited:
cope mental gymnastics op. It's because major of men are pathetic cucks who like simping to "m'ladies queens :soy:"
 
The reason why those big brands support feminism is because it's the politically correct thing to do, if a company went out and said "We hate womenz, foids should be put to death!" They'd be banned as 'evil' and 'women hating,' the owner of the brand would completely lose his business and be under the fire of the media.

If the brands outwardly supports women however they stand o gain financially without making any loses, compared to having a neutral view on feminism and gender politics which would yield no extra cash flow the later is a better option.

It's all just calculated decision making, remember these brands would've supported the nuclear family in different times.
 
Yup. Everyone who sincerely adheres to feminism is a fool being toyed with. Pretty much all women and many men.
 
The reason why those big brands support feminism is because it's the politically correct thing to do, if a company went out and said "We hate womenz, foids should be put to death!" They'd be banned as 'evil' and 'women hating,' the owner of the brand would completely lose his business and be under the fire of the media.

If the brands outwardly supports women however they stand o gain financially without making any loses, compared to having a neutral view on feminism and gender politics which would yield no extra cash flow the later is a better option.

It's all just calculated decision making, remember these brands would've supported the nuclear family in different times.
Honestly, that's a naive way of thinking. Billionaires and big corporations don't just abide by political policies, they shape them. If you look at the richest men in the world, almost all of them donated billions to leftist causes, particularly feminism.
 
true. it's also because women are more submissive and stupid.
so they make for good puppets in key positions.
 
Honestly, that's a naive way of thinking. Billionaires and big corporations don't just abide by political policies, they shape them. If you look at the richest men in the world, almost all of them donated billions to leftist causes, particularly feminism.
It isn't, lol, feminism is profitable as fuck with how the media and roasties eat it up. You're right about politics being shaped by them though, social media literally shaped the recent elections
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top