Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The looks blackpill is just a fragment of the biggest blackpill : LUCK RULES EVERYTHING.

Inbuddhist

Inbuddhist

Major
Joined
Feb 26, 2018
Posts
2,065
Everything comes down to luck. Some people here think that outside of looks, there is some think like "Merit" that comes from working hard and succeeding. But the reality, the true blackpill is that everything comes down to luck. There is no merit, no just deserving. Everyone wants to be happy and would've worked toward that if he had confidence/capacity/sheer luck. And the thing is that even confidence/capacity comes from luck, from being born in the right country, having a good education or good initial life experiences, having some positive feedbacks at the right moment, good genetics, resilience (and that also come from genetics, life experiences, education, positive feedback etc). There is absolutely 0 thing in this world that doesn't come down to sheer dumb luck, there is no merit, no bad person, no good person, no deserving person, no non-deserving person, what separates the most successfull or the most beautiful person and the biggest failure and the most ugly person is just a throw of dice, sheer luck.

There is this quote from Schopenhauer that sums life perfectly "A man’s life is like the voyage of a ship, where luck — secunda aut adversa fortuna — acts the part of the wind, and speeds the vessel on its way or drives it far out of its course. All that the man can do for himself is of little avail; like the rudder, which, if worked hard and continuously, may help in the navigation of the ship; and yet all may be lost again by a sudden squall. But if the wind is only in the right quarter, the ship will sail on so as not to need any steering. The power of luck is nowhere better expressed than in a certain Spanish proverb: Da Ventura a tu hijo, y echa lo en el mar — give your son luck and throw him into the sea."

(the thing is that, even the ability the steer is DUE TO LUCK )
 
Last edited:
Truth. Life is just luck and probability
 
TLDR

Nah fam.
 
Just like your personality your luck is strongly directly correlated to how good looking you are. The better looking you are the luckier you are

Funny how that works, its like personality theory
 
Cope, all it matters is if you're Chad or not
 
That’s what the “L” in LMS stands for buddy boyo.
 
Being born in the right place at the right time under the right circumstances is crucial. A lot of would not be incel if we weren't born on this era of hypergamy and feminism but instead in some other more forgiving time period. So there is some truth to this.
 
Just like your personality your luck is strongly directly correlated to how good looking you are. The better looking you are the luckier you are

Funny how that works, its like personality theory

I totally agree on this, looks give you opportunities, increases your well-being, your social capacities, emotional stability etc etc, and all of this determines to a huuuuuge factor the quality of your life, including thing that people don't suspect are related to looks.
 
If you are lucky u get born with Chad genetics and a outgoing personality on top of that. If your unlucky u get born as a sub 5 manlet with aspergers.
 
Every decision you make in life is determined by your neural structure (IQ), and your neural structure is determined by genetics. Your genetic makeup is something you have absolutely no control over. So yes, everything is determined by pure randomness (ie. luck)
 
Every decision you make in life is determined by your neural structure (IQ), and your neural structure is determined by genetics. Your genetic makeup is something you have absolutely no control over. So yes, everything is determined by pure randomness (ie. luck)

And the part that wasn't determined by genetics is determined by your environment/early life experiences, which is also determined by luck. Even the choices to change and modify that environment is determined by genetics + initial precedent experiences/informations that were caused by a combination of genetics/environment you didn't chose. So it's not just the genetics that comes down to luck, it's everything (genetics + environment)
 
Luck = good genetics

Even if you're a 6 in a shithole you'll have a more fulfilling life than an incel in Norway. Hard work can pay off, and how much it can depends on how good looking and intelligent you are. Education and every thing else's usefulness depend on the same, excluding access to holes which has nothing to do with intellect.
 
And the part that wasn't determined by genetics is determined by your environment/early life experiences, which is also determined by luck. Even the choices to change and modify that environment is determined by genetics + initial precedent experiences/informations that were caused by a combination of genetics/environment you didn't chose. So it's not just the genetics that comes down to luck, it's everything (genetics + environment)
Yes, ofcourse. I just wanted to put some emphasis on decision making/IQ being determined by genetics, because some people think that genetics only determine your looks
 
Yes, ofcourse. I just wanted to put some emphasis on decision making/IQ being determined by genetics, because some people think that genetics only determine your looks

Those people must be retarded lol.

I think it's because it's more easy to see the links for looks because we know about genes that determines eye color etc, while for intelligence for instance there is no single gene, but a combination of complex interractions of genes that we still don't understand perfectly.
 
I mostly agree, however you seem to entirely deny free will. Is that so?

For instance, don't you agree that sometimes, you have to make conscious efforts of will to maintain your physical exercise routine?

The flaw of normies, to my mind, is that they extrapolate the phenomenon of self-discipline to too many things that aren't solely dependent on self-discipline, such as scholarly or financial success. In my experience, scholarly success is the natural result of a healthy mental state (depression harms studying even more than lack of intelligence), and financial success is definitely the product of luck, as evidenced by all the startups that failed despite being superior to the winners.

Extrapolating self-discipline to romantic success is probably the worst, since it will almost assuredly lead to major depressive disorder when you're ugly.

I think these abusive extrapolations are the worst element of modern Western culture. I honestly prefer Eastern fatalism to these dangerous beliefs.
 
Last edited:
I mostly agree, however you seem to entirely deny free will. Is that so?

For instance, don't you agree that sometimes, you have to make conscious efforts of will to maintain your physical exercise routine?

The flaw of normies, to my mind, is that they extrapolate the phenomenon of self-discipline to too many things that aren't solely dependent on self-discipline, such as scholarly or financial success. In my experience, scholarly success is the natural result of a healthy mental state (depression harms studying even more than lack of intelligence), and financial success is definitely the product of luck, as evidenced by all the startups that failed despite being superior to the winners.
Even that stems from past experiences, hormonal architecture, and neural structure. There is will, but it is not free.

Doesn’t mean you shouldn't choose what you think is best, though
 
Even that stems from past experiences, hormonal architecture, and neural structure. There is will, but it is not free.

Doesn’t mean you shouldn't choose what you think is best, though
My judgment is certainly influenced by past events (for instance, I know that at some point in my nofap streak, I must always exercise greater vigilance than the other days to avoid a relapse) but I do feel free when it comes to the final choice. At least, I need that illusion of freedom to avoid falling into despair or fatalism ("you've never been able to do that, how do you expect to do it one day. Give up and admit you're just a lazy pig").

So far, by exercising self-discipline, I have reached some impressive results. Among which a resting heart rate of 60bpm and the ability to run semi-marathons. Without a healthy faith in my willpower (which translated into "no excuse" patterns of training), I would never have been able to do this.
 
Luck is the wrong word. Everything is just a coincidence. Luck would imply that it is something like a trait that can be possessed by some. It is not. It's all just random coincidence
 
I mostly agree, however you seem to entirely deny free will. Is that so?

For instance, don't you agree that sometimes, you have to make conscious efforts of will to maintain your physical exercise routine?

The flaw of normies, to my mind, is that they extrapolate the phenomenon of self-discipline to too many things that aren't solely dependent on self-discipline, such as scholarly or financial success. In my experience, scholarly success is the natural result of a healthy mental state (depression harms studying even more than lack of intelligence), and financial success is definitely the product of luck, as evidenced by all the startups that failed despite being superior to the winners.

Extrapolating self-discipline to romantic success is probably the worst, since it will almost assuredly lead to major depressive disorder when you're ugly.

I think these abusive extrapolations are the worst element of modern Western culture. I honestly prefer Eastern fatalism to these dangerous beliefs.

Yes i deny libertarian freewill.

The ability to make those efforts and the way in which you engage in them is a cause of genetics/environment. Libertarian free-will is a an absurd idea that doesn't make sense even conceptually.

I'm not saying that efforts makes no difference, or that discipline makes bo difference, just that they are also result of genetics/environment, not some magical source that is free of causality. Ah and btw even indeterminism can't save freewill. An action is either caused or uncaused (random), if random it can't be freewill also. And a mix of two things that aren't freewill can't suddenly lead to freewill.
 

Similar threads

Neovim
Replies
13
Views
269
Notkev
Notkev
lifeonhardcorelevel
Blackpill unfair everything
Replies
18
Views
393
Apex.Koala
Apex.Koala
SuperKanga.Belgrade
Replies
1
Views
176
SuperKanga.Belgrade
SuperKanga.Belgrade
TingusKangas
Replies
36
Views
986
Jud Pottah
Jud Pottah

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top