mentalcel666
Recruit
★★★★
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
- Posts
- 347
you are watering the argument, how about the simple solution of you only get free healthcare if you need it and a agreed upon one check up per 5 years or something, is that really so hard to imagine to come to a conclusion that way? i think not and you purposefully obstruce the facts and the topic of discussion (moving the goal poast) from discussing if people should get healthcare AT ALL or absolutely no healthcare, no one was talking about check ups. but going into debt for a broken foot is stupid and third world level of healthcareI never said that the weak should not be protected. You added that. I did not say it.
The police and the law are there to protect the weak. That's fantastic and that is enough.
Men get very little money through subsidies. Welfare payments are 100 times bigger than any kind of government subsidies. And I am talking here about subsidies to the private sector because the public sector is overwhelmingly staffed by foids who get to twiddle their thumbs and take huge maternity leave etc at taxpayer's expense.
The manly attitude is to accept that not all risks are covered.
Foids are the ones who want to have all risks covered.
If you cover all risks, you put an unbearable burden on those men who are prepared to innovate and move forward. And you rob all men of motivation. You turn them into ever tired subhuman blobs who cannot leave their basement.
Newsflash: We DO NOT have resources to cover all RISKS. Healthcare in particular is extremely costly and getting costlier by the minute. We certainly do not have enough resources to cover all health risks. Because what is a "reasonable" amount of healthcare? Should you do a cancer check-up every year? Every 6 months? what about every week? And what about all the other illnesses you could test for? Today, in welfare states, bureaucrats get to decide this kind of question for everybody without consultation. Why would I accept that? I should be able to choose the level of risk I am prepared to accept, and pay accordingly.
Otherwise, the state becomes this big mega husband of every foid who is ever ready to pay more for their risk aversion because he is able to fleece all his cuck slave male "citizens" for more money.
Cuck, Cuck, Cuck,
also your argument why laws are ok but welfare isnt doesnt make any sense,
just one example, what about the incel with disability that cant work through no fault of his own? he was born with a disability, should we help him and let him live on our cost? imo yes BECAUSE WE CAN AFFORD IT to take care of the eldery and sick, thats what societys does, thats what communities doe since the dawn of humanity, we help our sick and old.
maybe i have a different viewpoint then you because i have to rely on public healthcare for my meds to not kill myself and you are practically telling me that these things shouldnt exist and i should suffer with depression and anxiety and everyone else should suffer too because WHY?
BECAUSE ITS MANLY
great argument buddy! also you said cuck like 5 times in your post to describe me, really makes me want to never speak to you again, we are in the same boat here, our lifes are miserable because of inceldom, and even here we fight with each other over petty bullshit.