Again this cannot be proven empirically
Your using a non emperical thing to debunk using a emperical system?
1 thing that exist space and time must have a length and time as length takes up space and time explanatory
2consiousnes exists outside of space time.
C1 consciousness can be intuitively proven.
I don't think I have actually unironically argued this before, but you literally cannot empirically prove, space is real.
A you have argued parts of this as you keep pinning again jews as taking over the universities to support feminism I assumed you were talking about mainly this as for space yes you can prove it look at an electron it is orbiting in empty space we can also emperically prove the electron.
These Marxist institutions aren't the standard for evidence, well maybe to normies and modern science worshippers they are, but empiricism, and trustworthy institutions should at least be the base of the science. We have basically neither.
Except it isn't just hear say their is rigirous testing for every claim to say its merely a satanic conspiracy is extremely reductionist.
This isn't just a few bad apples, the heads, and top voices/influences, of just about every single scientific, and academic institution, is corrupt, and a tool of Marxism, and Propaganda. This isn't the apples that are the problem, this is the tree itself, that is rotted to the roots.
Again in what field I need names cause their are so many fields.
Heaven and Hell are likely physically places, heaven is likely a monitoring station to monitor the earth, aswell as harbor worthy candidates who come from the earth, and what greater world am I referring to? As I said, I am of the opinion, that the earth itself is much much much bigger than we have been lead to believe, not that it's flat, or a disc, or some nonsense like that, just that whatever we are on, is super massive in size, and we only on a small portion of it, and we are being lied to about what it is, so they we do not explore it.
None of what you have just said has been empirically even if what you said were true and the earth were larger this doesn't prove those other things also is heaven here physically is it a star gate a portal is it a location in space time is it in another dimension ?.
Hell is probably the opposite to heaven, possibly a physical simulation, where people are forced to suffer, for evils that committed on earth, hell might even be digital simulation that all our minds are linked to, and using advanced technology if we are unforgiving/evil we are forced to suffer in said simulation forever.
Physical simulation what do you mean a duelist brain in vat situation ? is this what you mean by heaven and hell mere simulations created by a mind ? or it is a physical location like a star gate and again i don't belive consciousness is physical so i don't accept the dualist thesis.
Not really, a soul can easily be explained scientifically using advanced technology. For example, it's very possible each and every single one of us is actually a super advanced microorganism, that uses our body as a host, possibly in our pineal gland, when our body dies, it perhaps leaves our body, possibly even interdimensionally to a degree, for safe transport, to "heaven" to be judged, and there said organism may possibly be given a new physical body, or forced to suffer in a hellish simulation, or maybe just put on hold in a limbo state.
Okay
P1 human beings are advanced organisms.
P2 Our bodies are hosts for some sort of a micro organism.
P3 the pineal gland is the gateway for it's control.
P4 it somehow has a life of it's own that goes to be judged
P5 we are all in a brain in a vat simulation
C1 the soul is merely connected to the pinneal gland.
C2 we have no free will so even in thought this makes no ethical sense.
Your main issue P3/P4/P5 P3 how can the pineal gland host the soul or the micro organism when all we know about it is it secretes growth hormone also your assumption assumes consciousness is some form of a physical or material thing As for the after life We have no proof of a after life it could be real but we don't know i know for a fact reincarnation in some form is real if their are infinite bubble universes assuming the many worlds hypothesis is true i'm not saying it is but if it is it would mean in some sense you are immortal know if an after life in my belife did exist it would be a mere abstraction in gods mind i don't know as for the conclusion the soul is reduce-able to a microorganism that logically then follows we are but mere slaves to the host so we have no free will so what case is their for a just heaven or hell.
This is just one hypothetical way souls can exist in a physical form/fashion, especially when it take into account a hyper advanced species that has access to technology thousands of years more advanced than ours.
Ahhhhhhhh simulation hypothesis main problem i don't use that is to computatate something like an electron more electrons would have to be put in more so than the observable universes combined i move towards a mind rather than a computer all is mind.
1 simulation theory can be imagined.
2 It cannot computed as to computate something like a universe it must have more power than the entire universe itself and to be running constantly.
3 This is not even possible in any time line as far as we are aware the universe is transfinite.
4 to computate a transfinite universe you need a machine longer than transfinite.
5 you can however create abstract worlds as your mind literally works of sense perception your already solipsistic without you realizing it.
6 If we can create abstractions and mind is not reduce-able to matter that means mind is fundemntal it exists that means ideas emerge from a consiousness.
7 the universe being logical must emerge from a higher mind.
8 if we can create metaphysical proofs for the universe being a dream in gods mind but we cannot create scientific proof we are in a simulation than the prior is true thanks to occams.
Conclusion we live in the mind of god we do not live in an ancestor simulation.
Yeah I get it you get your ideas from bluepilled reddit tier sources.
I am the one providing premises and conclusions here you have done jack shit and your's is based on way more assumptions than mine as for soydeddit every time i posted this argument i god shit from atheists yeah no as for blue pill i guess Einstein was blue pilled i guess Schrodinger was blue pilled i guess gorge cantor was blue pilled okay but they gave their proofs of concept and if conception is possible and mind does not reduce to non mind then mind is fundamental then consiousness exists and if our minds can conceive of it and thoughts are real and are universals than infinity a concept in nature should mirror this or rather transfinite and we kinda of get this it's probably not absolute infinite but we can atleast see it higher than countable numbers but anyways the universe then being able to construct these must be abstractions of a god mind.
In reality I would assume that God, aswell as the species he comes from, at the higher echelons, has an IQ of around 200-400, they're probably much more genetically superior, from a eugenics standpoint we've probably devolved quite a bit, albeit they will likely be very genetically similar to us, likely because of advanced technology they probably have bred out/removed certain negative traits.
Again went over this not going over this again.
The difference being your God is a satanic tier reddit myth, based off of meme science, and mine is statistically real from observable empirical evidence and data.
JFL satanic ? how exactly the idea that god is a quantum mathematical super mind is unique to my religion panendeism.As for Reddit cucks they hate this argument.As for yours being statically true your's presupposes that their were alien civilizations before us which is not emperical it is proof by assertion or ipsi dixit.
P1 it is hypothetically possible that at some point a group of intelligent aliens simulate a reality.
P2 Know assume you take this to the universal level we somehow some way managed to create a fully functioning universe.
P3 we would then have to assume all things are reduceable to physical matter or quantum bits.
P4 this would reduce mind to matter or quantum information.
C1 you lead to solipsism you are denying the consious awareness a real phenomena and if it is non physical it cannot be reduced to non mind.
C2 we are living in a solipsistic universe.