jerrycan dan
autistic retard
-
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2018
- Posts
- 8,952
Firstly, the industrial revolution turns life into inane wagecucking from as soon as you are deemed old enough to do it until you are a frail half-dead sack of geriatric shit. Industrial life is focused around wage labour and in a massive collective cope our culture now lionises "having a job" (demonising NEETs because they aren't cucks). I have no doubt in my mind that preindustrial farmhand labour was probably less stressful and demanding than a lot of modern wage labour even if it sucked overall and people lived in huts, because even though studies have shown that the average Englishman worked 11 hours a day in 1750 (Africans and South Americans with simpler societies and pastoral/shifting cultivation of animals and crops worked far less than that) it was not constant maintenance of a system like even working in a outbound call centre is now - something like a third of the days in each year were feast days. Why do you think people only started agitating for 8 hour days after it?
If you read about workers adapting to industrialisation, you will find that in England and Wales at first absenteeism was a huge problem because of Saint's Monday - workers for hundreds of years literally just opted to not go to work on Mondays sometimes, it's far less rigid than shift work and almost seems like something you would read about occurring in Africa. Read Thoreau's Walden or Ted Kaczynski's musings on living in a cabin in the woods - once a day's work (in Thoreau's case cutting wood or hoeing dirt to grow beans and indian meal, which is more like doing odd jobs than clocking in for drudgery until you clock out) is done, people have better leisure time that they can actually feel at peace doing nothing in or (if they are exceptional, which most people today still aren't) pursuing their own interests because they aren't mentally recovering from wagecuckoldry.
It seems like work with set hours and set methodical tasks has become so central to our lives that nothing is more important than it now. Is it really any surprise that people stopped giving a shit about God and the church? Even when something like 40% of people in Northwestern Europe (the most advanced part of the world) could read in the century immediately before the industrial revolution, the church still encouraged spiritual activities and deep contemplation like fasting, memento mori, etc for illiterate shit kicking farmers that was central to their lives.
For how central work is to everything now compared to before, look no further than what women do. Abrahamic religious texts say women should be in the home taking care of kids. Today we treat this as an either-or situation - feminists say women in the workforce is a good thing because 19th century English women spent 14 hours a day working in textile mills, modern tradcucks (who want something that was only really ever practiced by upper-middle class people in a small part of the world for less than a century) want women to be in the home spending all day baking cakes or some shit. If you send women to work in an industrial society it consumes their lives to completely they can't even raise their kids anymore and have to send them to daycare (public schooling is daycare with indoctrination) or just not have them in the first place. Before the industrial revolution women would help with farmwork, weave textiles in their spare time and such but that work didn't have to be something they put off having kids for, a woman could easily do work inside the house (which they didn't have roombas for, keep in mind) and outside of it (women and children helped with harvests for instance) while still having her role as a mother be central to her life. This is better for men, better for kids, better for everyone.
The industrial revolution has made us (especially Western men, who do not benefit from widespread availability of fakeup like women do while still having obliterated forward growth from bottle feeding that has managed to kill wetnursing as an industry) ugly, not just from diet and lifestyle changes affecting our body composition but also our bone structure:
The tldr is disingenuous because women weren't given rights, poor women were just forced to work in textile mills and could not find the time or willpower to breastfeed their kids because economic conditions forced them to do that. Even with women having no rights, industrialisation will fuck up society and make us subhumans.
The bottom 80% of men are way uglier now than they need to be. How will women respond to this? Ramping up hypergamy, now with automobiles (drive to Chad's house), contraceptives (fuck Chad with no consequences) and social media (surround yourself with nobody but Chad and his buddies) with NO CONSEQUENCES whatsoever. Women who were whores were SHUNNED in the past because they carried a bajillion diseases and their behaviour inevitably created scores of bastard children, but while single motherhood is reaching epidemic proportions among low IQ people today the vast majority of the nastiest consequences for this behaviour are gone.
This is like letting children who are not fully aware of their actions do whatever they want, abolishing the consequences for behaviour that guided regulation of that behaviour for thousands of years will inevitably completely fucking destroy your social fabric. Combine that with women being unable to be mothers while at the same time "working" because work is now a clock in clock out 40 hour week endeavour (and they can medicate themselves out of motherhood with the pill) and everything is completely fucked.
Human beings are not supposed to function in these conditions, it's all a big fat fucking mess and a mistake that cannot be solved without either removing human beings as they currently function or the industrial-technological system from the picture. We live in a mouse utopia.
If you read about workers adapting to industrialisation, you will find that in England and Wales at first absenteeism was a huge problem because of Saint's Monday - workers for hundreds of years literally just opted to not go to work on Mondays sometimes, it's far less rigid than shift work and almost seems like something you would read about occurring in Africa. Read Thoreau's Walden or Ted Kaczynski's musings on living in a cabin in the woods - once a day's work (in Thoreau's case cutting wood or hoeing dirt to grow beans and indian meal, which is more like doing odd jobs than clocking in for drudgery until you clock out) is done, people have better leisure time that they can actually feel at peace doing nothing in or (if they are exceptional, which most people today still aren't) pursuing their own interests because they aren't mentally recovering from wagecuckoldry.
It seems like work with set hours and set methodical tasks has become so central to our lives that nothing is more important than it now. Is it really any surprise that people stopped giving a shit about God and the church? Even when something like 40% of people in Northwestern Europe (the most advanced part of the world) could read in the century immediately before the industrial revolution, the church still encouraged spiritual activities and deep contemplation like fasting, memento mori, etc for illiterate shit kicking farmers that was central to their lives.
For how central work is to everything now compared to before, look no further than what women do. Abrahamic religious texts say women should be in the home taking care of kids. Today we treat this as an either-or situation - feminists say women in the workforce is a good thing because 19th century English women spent 14 hours a day working in textile mills, modern tradcucks (who want something that was only really ever practiced by upper-middle class people in a small part of the world for less than a century) want women to be in the home spending all day baking cakes or some shit. If you send women to work in an industrial society it consumes their lives to completely they can't even raise their kids anymore and have to send them to daycare (public schooling is daycare with indoctrination) or just not have them in the first place. Before the industrial revolution women would help with farmwork, weave textiles in their spare time and such but that work didn't have to be something they put off having kids for, a woman could easily do work inside the house (which they didn't have roombas for, keep in mind) and outside of it (women and children helped with harvests for instance) while still having her role as a mother be central to her life. This is better for men, better for kids, better for everyone.
The industrial revolution has made us (especially Western men, who do not benefit from widespread availability of fakeup like women do while still having obliterated forward growth from bottle feeding that has managed to kill wetnursing as an industry) ugly, not just from diet and lifestyle changes affecting our body composition but also our bone structure:
TLDR were ugly because we let women have rights, we wouldve all been chads 150 years ago
Other cliffs:
Skullmogged by a five year old:
Mike Mew was right:
JAW = LIFE
Source: https://onezero.medium.com/our-skul...ould-mean-a-public-health-crisis-f950faed696d
I feel like this would interest you @BlkPillPres
The tldr is disingenuous because women weren't given rights, poor women were just forced to work in textile mills and could not find the time or willpower to breastfeed their kids because economic conditions forced them to do that. Even with women having no rights, industrialisation will fuck up society and make us subhumans.
The bottom 80% of men are way uglier now than they need to be. How will women respond to this? Ramping up hypergamy, now with automobiles (drive to Chad's house), contraceptives (fuck Chad with no consequences) and social media (surround yourself with nobody but Chad and his buddies) with NO CONSEQUENCES whatsoever. Women who were whores were SHUNNED in the past because they carried a bajillion diseases and their behaviour inevitably created scores of bastard children, but while single motherhood is reaching epidemic proportions among low IQ people today the vast majority of the nastiest consequences for this behaviour are gone.
This is like letting children who are not fully aware of their actions do whatever they want, abolishing the consequences for behaviour that guided regulation of that behaviour for thousands of years will inevitably completely fucking destroy your social fabric. Combine that with women being unable to be mothers while at the same time "working" because work is now a clock in clock out 40 hour week endeavour (and they can medicate themselves out of motherhood with the pill) and everything is completely fucked.
Human beings are not supposed to function in these conditions, it's all a big fat fucking mess and a mistake that cannot be solved without either removing human beings as they currently function or the industrial-technological system from the picture. We live in a mouse utopia.
Last edited: