Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy The hypocrisy of our promiscuous society

E

Edmund_Kemper

Disregard my larping efforts. I can’t change it.
-
Joined
Sep 26, 2019
Posts
25,322
the one thing that’s positive about being incel is the fact that we see how dumb society is and can notice their lies. I’ll explain

society says that sex is supposed to be the best, most fun thing in the world and is supposed to feel really good but at the same time, society believes that sex crimes “ruin people’s lives and nobody can heal from sex crimes”. I can see why rape would be traumatic as it probably is physically painful, but other sex crimes aren’t even that painful. Crimes like sex with minors, getting groped, inappropriately touching kids, dating an older person when you’re underage, etc aren’t even as painful as society says they are. Yeah a lot of these crimes are still bad, no doubt, but the only reason why they traumatized people is because of society’s reaction to the crime, not because of the nature of the crime itself. Seriously, how the hell can some kid be traumatized by having his dick merely touched by some adult? The kid is only traumatized because of society’s reaction to the crime. If he didn’t notice society’s reaction to the crime, he probably would see it as a brief weird moment and move on. Also, this idea that sex with jb girls will traumatized them. The only reason some 14 year old foid would have PTSD from having sex with a man is because of society’s reaction to the crime. I bet back when interracial dating was stigmatized, there were white foids “traumatized” from dating a black man but only because of the stigma against interracial dating back then.

in 1955, a man named Paul Tappen wrote about this myth. Click the link to see what he said. This is called the nocebo effect. You teach someone to be traumatized by something, they’ll be traumatized by it regardless of how traumatic it truly was.

Why does society think even the least severe sex crimes traumatized us for life? Here’s why (explained by author DJ Wood):

“Since biblical times, sexual behavior has been scrutinized and looked upon as “evil” and “sinful” and perpetrators were cast as villains. For many, sex is only for the purposes of procreation (Clark, 1996). This meant that anything other than vaginal intercourse for the purposes of procreation was frowned upon and often punished. Even today, pure biblical scholars believe sex is for procreation and is not meant to be fun. The acts may not have been illegal but masturbation, and oral and anal sex were all sins, condemning the perpetrator to an eternity in hell.
This became the foundation of the legal restrictions on sexual behavior. Joys of the flesh and the virtue of a woman have remained an integral part of what society considers sex crimes (Quinn, et al., 2004). Sexually appropriate behavior is a cultural phenomenon and therefore changes over time. Creating many motivations for sexual crimes. Historically, women, especially young women, have been considered naïve and in many cases less intelligent than their male counterparts therefore requiring protection (Clark, 1996). The laws were enacted to protect the particularly vulnerable members of society: women and children (Quinn, et al, 2004). Others have included prevention of illegitimate children and passing on of sexually transmitted disease as reasons to control sexual behavior.”

“Sexual safety is at the core of our sociological and psychological self. Sex is considered the most intimate relationship one can have with another; therefore, taking this is the ultimate violation. Thus, the protection from sexual violation is paramount to our physical and psychological well-being. Therefore, they argue that, we have an all-inclusive label of sexual predator for all sex offenders. They go on to show that, because we fear sex crimes against children the most, all become pedophiles. This is as a self-protection mechanism from what we deem to be the vilest of crimes”

I also wanna say that society didn’t always have this whole “anything under 18 is evil pedophilia” type of thinking. Pedophiles didn’t become the most hated people in society until the progressive era (1890-1920). That’s even when the age of consent was raised much higher. And the panic over sex offenders in general didn’t begin until 1937 with 3 sex-murders of children in NY. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/summer-pervert-hysteria-1937-article-1.396521

it’s insane how society cannot live without sex and sex is the best thing one can experience yet society thinks simply groping someone or having sex with a teen will “traumatize them permanently”.

This is what I think is the good thing about being incel and blackpilled, we see the hypocrisy of normies

TL;DR the way society viewed sex throughout history is what made us see sex crimes as “worse than murder”
 
Sex crimes are only an issue when an undesirable male commits them, this is a form of doublethink by normies, being groped by an undesirable man is the real crime, not the groping itself.

Why do you think women get relative slaps on the wrist for committing sex crime? If society wanted to, they could not punish them at all, but that would be glaring discrimination and a lot of people would wake up if such a thing were to happen. So society gives them some punishment, but much less, since women are not undesirables by society's standards.
 
Sex crimes are only an issue when an undesirable male commits them, this is a form of doublethink by normies, being groped by an undesirable man is the real crime, not the groping itself.

Why do you think women get relative slaps on the wrist for committing sex crime? If society wanted to, they could not punish them at all, but that would be glaring discrimination and a lot of people would wake up if such a thing were to happen. So society gives them some punishment, but much less, since women are not undesirables by society's standards.
Also this idea that if I’m 12 and another 12 year old touches my cock, it won’t traumatize me, only would traumatize me if the person is older than me like wtf?
 
Good thread man. Society wants to eat its cake and have it too, its retarded
 
Good thread man. Society wants to eat its cake and have it too, its retarded
It’s funny how a person who bangs a 15 year old is seen as more evil and scary than a serial killer
 
It’s funny how a person who bangs a 15 year old is seen as more evil and scary than a serial killer

I wouldn't say that tbh. Both are looked down upon by society, they might be viewed equally evil when the killer is worse, but the sex offender is not viewed as "worse"
 
I wouldn't say that tbh. Both are looked down upon by society, they might be viewed equally evil when the killer is worse, but the sex offender is not viewed as "worse"
What I mean is that there are retards who think banging a 15 year old should be a capital crime
 
What I mean is that there are retards who think banging a 15 year old should be a capital crime

Yeah they're fucking retarded. I wish I could smack them across the face repeatedly (in mario kart)
 
Yeah they're fucking retarded. I wish I could smack them across the face repeatedly (in mario kart)
But this idea that if you have your dick merely touched when you’re a kid, you’ll be traumatized. How can something like that traumatize you? If someone touched me there it’d be simply a brief awkward moment and wouldn’t be anything else. Being inappropriately touched is bad but it only traumatizes kids because of society’s reaction to the crime.
 
But this idea that if you have your dick merely touched when you’re a kid, you’ll be traumatized. How can something like that traumatize you? If someone touched me there it’d be a brief awkward moment and that’s it

Yeah I don't get it either. Adam Lanza actually complained about this with the doctor inspecting his weiner, but then again, Adam Lanza was insane in the head.
 
Yeah I don't get it either. Adam Lanza actually complained about this with the doctor inspecting his weiner, but then again, Adam Lanza was insane in the head.
Also this idea that rape and sex abuse victims can never heal is a myth. Yeah they struggle but they still can have a decent life
 
Let's be accurate. A sex crime occurs when an undesirable male is accused of doing something. The idea that he would actually have to commit the act in question to be considered guilty is laughable.
 
Let's be accurate. A sex crime occurs when an undesirable male is accused of doing something. The idea that he would actually have to commit the act in question to be considered guilty is laughable.
Many people think sex offenders usually reoffend even though they have a very low recidivism rate
 
So now IT posted this and one cuck puts words in my mouth “TLDR: Another incel essay why pedophilia is good, because if adult people enjoy having sex therefore non-adult children couldn't possibly be traumatized. He cherry-picks some barely relevant points from sources and crudely tries to shoe-horn them as justifications.”

I never said anywhere that molesting little kids is good. What I said is that getting your dick touched isn’t that bad. It’s just a mere brief moment of Uncomfortable. The only reason it traumatized people is because of society’s reaction to the crime
 
the one thing that’s positive about being incel is the fact that we see how dumb society is and can notice their lies. I’ll explain

society says that sex is supposed to be the best, most fun thing in the world and is supposed to feel really good but at the same time, society believes that sex crimes “ruin people’s lives and nobody can heal from sex crimes”. I can see why rape would be traumatic as it probably is physically painful, but other sex crimes aren’t even that painful. Crimes like sex with minors, getting groped, inappropriately touching kids, dating an older person when you’re underage, etc aren’t even as painful as society says they are. Yeah a lot of these crimes are still bad, no doubt, but the only reason why they traumatized people is because of society’s reaction to the crime, not because of the nature of the crime itself. Seriously, how the hell can some kid be traumatized by having his dick merely touched by some adult? The kid is only traumatized because of society’s reaction to the crime. If he didn’t notice society’s reaction to the crime, he probably would see it as a brief weird moment and move on. Also, this idea that sex with jb girls will traumatized them. The only reason some 14 year old foid would have PTSD from having sex with a man is because of society’s reaction to the crime. I bet back when interracial dating was stigmatized, there were white foids “traumatized” from dating a black man but only because of the stigma against interracial dating back then.

in 1955, a man named Paul Tappen wrote about this myth. Click the link to see what he said. This is called the nocebo effect. You teach someone to be traumatized by something, they’ll be traumatized by it regardless of how traumatic it truly was.

Why does society think even the least severe sex crimes traumatized us for life? Here’s why (explained by author DJ Wood):

“Since biblical times, sexual behavior has been scrutinized and looked upon as “evil” and “sinful” and perpetrators were cast as villains. For many, sex is only for the purposes of procreation (Clark, 1996). This meant that anything other than vaginal intercourse for the purposes of procreation was frowned upon and often punished. Even today, pure biblical scholars believe sex is for procreation and is not meant to be fun. The acts may not have been illegal but masturbation, and oral and anal sex were all sins, condemning the perpetrator to an eternity in hell.
This became the foundation of the legal restrictions on sexual behavior. Joys of the flesh and the virtue of a woman have remained an integral part of what society considers sex crimes (Quinn, et al., 2004). Sexually appropriate behavior is a cultural phenomenon and therefore changes over time. Creating many motivations for sexual crimes. Historically, women, especially young women, have been considered naïve and in many cases less intelligent than their male counterparts therefore requiring protection (Clark, 1996). The laws were enacted to protect the particularly vulnerable members of society: women and children (Quinn, et al, 2004). Others have included prevention of illegitimate children and passing on of sexually transmitted disease as reasons to control sexual behavior.”

“Sexual safety is at the core of our sociological and psychological self. Sex is considered the most intimate relationship one can have with another; therefore, taking this is the ultimate violation. Thus, the protection from sexual violation is paramount to our physical and psychological well-being. Therefore, they argue that, we have an all-inclusive label of sexual predator for all sex offenders. They go on to show that, because we fear sex crimes against children the most, all become pedophiles. This is as a self-protection mechanism from what we deem to be the vilest of crimes”

I also wanna say that society didn’t always have this whole “anything under 18 is evil pedophilia” type of thinking. Pedophiles didn’t become the most hated people in society until the progressive era (1890-1920). That’s even when the age of consent was raised much higher. And the panic over sex offenders in general didn’t begin until 1937 with 3 sex-murders of children in NY. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/summer-pervert-hysteria-1937-article-1.396521

it’s insane how society cannot live without sex and sex is the best thing one can experience yet society thinks simply groping someone or having sex with a teen will “traumatize them permanently”.

This is what I think is the good thing about being incel and blackpilled, we see the hypocrisy of normies

TL;DR the way society viewed sex throughout history is what made us see sex crimes as “worse than murder”

I am not sure promiscuous is the right word to use given the underlying context.
 
I wouldn't say that tbh. Both are looked down upon by society, they might be viewed equally evil when the killer is worse, but the sex offender is not viewed as "worse"
People who get labelled as pedos will get lynched or shanked in prison, and when it happens normies will have no sympathy for them.

Not to mention men who get falsely accused and then their life gets ruined because their reputation is destroyed.
 
People who get labelled as pedos will get lynched or shanked in prison

Actually that's true, didn't think of that
 
Interesting stuff
Look up nocebo
I am not sure promiscuous is the right word to use given the underlying context.
Why?
People who get labelled as pedos will get lynched or shanked in prison, and when it happens normies will have no sympathy for them.

Not to mention men who get falsely accused and then their life gets ruined because their reputation is destroyed.
That actually doesn’t always happen to child molesters in prison all the time. If you’re in a low-security prison, you won’t be attacked, just ostracized. You’d only be attacked in a medium-high security prison. Also, some sex offenders are in protective custody and in some states, inmates cannot see your paperwork. Also, the reason inmates hate child molesters isn’t because inmates care about kids. Inmates often rape 16/17 year olds in adult prisons and inmates often refer to their rape victims as “kids”. The reason why inmates hate child molesters is because of the hypermasculine culture of who can commit the coolest or toughest crime and they think crimes like bank robberies and killing cops are the most badass while crimes involving children are lame and too easy to do. Also, I think inmates hate child molesters because a lot of inmates are hated by society for committing crimes like murder, robbery, domestic assault, etc and they hate child molesters to virtue signal and be all like “well hey at least I don’t molest kids”.

when an inmates attacks a child molester in prison, he doesn’t do it because he’s angry at the child molester’s crime, he does it because he’ll get attacked by other inmates if he refuses to attack the child molester
Actually that's true, didn't think of that
It’s actually only sort of true. That happens to some child molesters in prison but not all
 
Last edited:
If a cumdumpster has had 99 dicks and you rape her, she's then had 100 dicks.
That 1% of dick shouldn't matter.

I'd understand if she was a virgin and got raped though
full
 
If a cumdumpster has had 99 dicks and you rape her, she's then had 100 dicks.
That 1% of dick shouldn't matter.

I'd understand if she was a virgin and got raped though
full
Feminists think a woman will be scarred for life if you grab their ass
 
society says that sex is supposed to be the best, most fun thing in the world and is supposed to feel really good but at the same time, society believes that sex crimes “ruin people’s lives and nobody can heal from sex crimes”. I can see why rape would be traumatic as it probably is physically painful
Rape is a bad thing for several reasons but what pisses me off is that our culture is SO hysterically skewed in favor of females that raping a female is unanimously seen as worse than murdering a male, which is completely fucking irrational no matter what excuse you use
 
Rape is a bad thing for several reasons but what pisses me off is that our culture is SO hysterically skewed in favor of females that raping a female is unanimously seen as worse than murdering a male, which is completely fucking irrational no matter what excuse you use
Although rape isn’t worse than murder. This idea that a rape victim can never heal or have a decent life is a myth
 
This idea that a rape victim can never heal or have a decent life is a myth
It's so unfair, men have proven to be able to carry on despite far worse traumas than rape without needing so much help from others (like having their loved ones murdered while raised in war torn country, or spending years in slave labor), but when a female is beaten while having a rod shoved in her against her will it's the worst act a human being can do to another? Worse than murder and slavery? Give me a fucking break
 
It's so unfair, men have proven to be able to carry on despite far worse traumas than rape without needing so much help from others (like having their loved ones murdered while raised in war torn country, or spending years in slave labor), but when a female is beaten while having a rod shoved in her against her will it's the worst act a human being can do to another? Worse than murder and slavery? Give me a fucking break
IKR. People assume that a man can recover from war-related trauma but a kid cannot heal from having their penis merely touched
 

Similar threads

exposesociety
Replies
8
Views
471
Anthrofurrcel
Anthrofurrcel
exposesociety
Replies
3
Views
528
RandomGuy
RandomGuy
exposesociety
Replies
12
Views
303
MisanthropicMemes
MisanthropicMemes
exposesociety
Replies
4
Views
353
m3nt4Lbl0ck3d
m3nt4Lbl0ck3d
DeathSigil
Replies
3
Views
427
CrackingYs
CrackingYs

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top