Atavistic Autist
Intersectional autistic supremacy
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 28, 2018
- Posts
- 9,340
Why do foids generally "prefer the look" of a multilated cock, a putrid perversion of nature that should disgust anyone? Simply because it's the type of cock that they've been sucking on since 12 years old and seeing in (((pornography))). They've learned that it's standard for all the high-status fuckboys to have cripple cocks and therefore have learned to like them.
This demonstrates that there is a certain latitude to what foids can find attractive, and it is effected by their upbringing and introduction into sexuality. Unfortunately, our society lets foids be taught their sexuality by Chad, and he sets the standards and expectations of foids forever after -- even to the point of making his deficiencies into a turn-on for them!
Just Be First theory is crucial here. Imagine if instead of learning that Chad's numbed out cock and psychopathic tendencies are attractive, foids were taught that neurotic men with intact cocks whose sense of caution and lack of desire to rape/brutalize them was attractive. This would require a totally different structure to society, one which would eliminate medical industry greed (the reason why the anachronistic procedure of circumcision is still promoted) and disincentivize selfishness/psychopathy in general; namely, a socialist despotism. JFL if you support neoliberalism and individual autonomy as an incel.
To put it in other words: the line between what's disgusting and arousing when it comes to sexuality is so thin and easily blurred that those who have control over the socialization process of foids will permanently shape their sexual attitudes. There is no practical difference between foids learning to like Chad's abuse and foids learning to like the supposed "indignities" of an arranged marriage, for example. Whoever has authority over them wins. Remember, foids are quite literally toilets who are meant to absorb a man's bodily fluids; so whether they find something disgusting or arousing is merely a matter of peer pressure, and a change to social structure and authority would change them accordingly.
This demonstrates that there is a certain latitude to what foids can find attractive, and it is effected by their upbringing and introduction into sexuality. Unfortunately, our society lets foids be taught their sexuality by Chad, and he sets the standards and expectations of foids forever after -- even to the point of making his deficiencies into a turn-on for them!
Just Be First theory is crucial here. Imagine if instead of learning that Chad's numbed out cock and psychopathic tendencies are attractive, foids were taught that neurotic men with intact cocks whose sense of caution and lack of desire to rape/brutalize them was attractive. This would require a totally different structure to society, one which would eliminate medical industry greed (the reason why the anachronistic procedure of circumcision is still promoted) and disincentivize selfishness/psychopathy in general; namely, a socialist despotism. JFL if you support neoliberalism and individual autonomy as an incel.
To put it in other words: the line between what's disgusting and arousing when it comes to sexuality is so thin and easily blurred that those who have control over the socialization process of foids will permanently shape their sexual attitudes. There is no practical difference between foids learning to like Chad's abuse and foids learning to like the supposed "indignities" of an arranged marriage, for example. Whoever has authority over them wins. Remember, foids are quite literally toilets who are meant to absorb a man's bodily fluids; so whether they find something disgusting or arousing is merely a matter of peer pressure, and a change to social structure and authority would change them accordingly.
Last edited: