Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The Final Nail In The Coffin On Why I Became Racially Radicalized

  • Thread starter Racial-Identitarian
  • Start date
It's both. You do realize it can be both yes? Genetics isn't one or the other
If you state nilotic people then it is understandable but bantu people even in highly urbanized like kigali (Rwanda) still have shorter average despite high animal protein diet

 
Last edited:
Except that's not true, and I know you're seething at us mogging you so you pathetically try and make it look like we racemixed snd destroyed our genes
You are not destroyed but ruined by steppe chink on horse
 
1000027384
 
Jokes on you i dont even bring up the South Eurasian Admixture to the debate
What?
Arabs are genetically closest to Kavkaz
kavkaz are genetically arab, even if they're not linguistically arab
and armenian due to shared Y haplogroup
Armenians are not white and they are very close genetically to iraqis
You dont understand the context here
Maybe stop typing like an ESL?
what i mean is that the nigger slave population were in fact absorbed by the local middle eastern population.
That's fanfiction
There is a reason why there is smaller nigger population in middle east despite the longer and massive slave trade.
Because there were less blacks brought to the middle east compared to the millions brought to America
Obviously you will find a variation among the population but my point still stands north africa and middle east as a whole have substantial nigger DNA among their population.
No they dont lmfao. Already showed you that yemen is 9% and saudi is 3%. Other populations have 0%
 
If you state nilotic people then it is understandable but bantu people even in highly urbanized like kigali (Rwanda) still have shorter average despite high animal protein diet

West africans and Horner africans are the tall ones, not Rwandan.
You are not destroyed but ruined by steppe chink on horse
No, most of us lack any significant gook dna. I'm only 1.5% kazakh
 
That's fanfiction​
1739433314180
"African women were enslaved by Arabs more than African men." Source: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004BSGHYA/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
No they dont lmfao. Already showed you that yemen is 9% and saudi is 3%. Other populations have 0%

DNA variation of populations from the Near East and Africa and found a very high frequency of African lineages present in the Yemen Hadramawt: more than a third were of clear sub-Saharan origin. Other Arab populations carried ∼10% lineages of sub-Saharan origin. Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1180338/
Saudi Arabs had only a minority sub-Saharan Africa component (7%), similar to the specific North-African contribution (5%). In addition, a small Indian influence (3%) was also detected. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/public...NA_Influences_in_the_Saudi_Arabian_Population
The screening of 741,000 variants in 420 Arabians and 80 Iranians allowed us to quantify the dominant sub-Saharan African admixture in the west of the peninsula, whereas South Asian and Levantine/European influence was stronger in the east, leading to a rift between western and eastern sides of the Peninsula. Source: https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/36/3/575/5288780?login=false

We also detect about 3-5% sub-African ancestry in all the Jewish populations, a finding that is novel as far as we are aware, and certainly has not been unambiguously demonstrated or quantified. For Levantines, the proportions are often higher: 9.3%±0.4% in Palestinians and >10% in the Bedouins (standard errors were calculated using a Block Jackknife as described in Materials and Methods). Source:https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001373
I've had enough of the cherry picked studies. New or not it doesn't disprove anything compared to your single source.

The signal of African mixture that we detect in Levantines (Bedouins, Palestinians and Druze) – an average of 32 generations or ∼1000 years ago – is more recent than the signal in Europeans, which might be related to the migrations between North Africa and Middle East that have occurred over the last thousand years, and the proximity of Levantine groups geographically to Africa. Syria and Palestine were under Egyptian political control until the 16th century AD when they were conquered by the Ottoman Empire. This is in concordance with our proposed dates. In addition, the Arab slave trade is responsible for the movement of large numbers of people from Africa across the Red Sea to Arabia from 650 to 1900 AD and probably even prior to the Islamic times [7], [37]. We caution that our sampling of the Middle East is sparse, and it will be of interest to study African ancestry in additional groups from this region. Source: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1001373


1739435020800

The ADMIXTURE results (Figure 8) confirm the observation from the PCA showing that most Yemenis have some African ancestry which is maximized in Hudayda and Hadramout, with the later having in addition some East Asian ancestry, while the Maarib individuals appear to be the least admixed of the populations tested in Yemen.​
Source: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/749341v1.full
 
Last edited:
Nah, west africans have taller genetic potential than Asians. Basic fact

What is the name of the specific genes then you outdated dumbass?

Just reminder here, i just dont like my thread being derailed by your worthless racemixing shit video so if you fucking try again not only i would post more about sub saharan admixture but also east eurasian, and elamites admixture.
 
Last edited:
What is this supposed to prove?
I've had enough of the cherry picked studies. New or not it doesn't disprove anything compared to your single source.
Because you're a dumbass who doesn't read his own papers that he sites lmfao

Both this study


And this study


that you sited are talking about mitochondrial DNA, in other words, it is talking about the relative female lineages in these populations, it is NOT talking about total black DNA.

Bring studies on autosmal DNA and then we can talk lmfao.


Also, the fact that you site this study once again shows how retarded you are, because this study is not talking about autosmal DNA, nor is it even talking about mitochondrial DNA like the other 2 studies you cited. This is talking about gene variation among arabs in the peninsula and whether these genes are shared with blacks, europeans, or indians. And as I've told many dumbasses you can't understand Jack shit about genetics: sharing DNA does not mean being mixed with those populations directly, hence why south europeans share DNA with somalis, yet that doesn't mean greeks or italians have somali DNA, does it? Same logic applies to arabs


1739442443306


In fact, according to this map, Sicily and Greec is more somali than the arabian peninsula lmfao. But of course, again, that's not actually true since this is simply showing a haplogroup map, not total genetics or admixture with somalis
 
Again, read the studies you dumb fuck


This study you sited is, once again, about haplogroups, mitochondrial dna, and other such things. This is an indication of shared ancestry, but that does not mean having black ancestors.

Fucking learn how to read.

Just like europeans sharing haplogroups with indians doesn't mean those europeans have indian dna, dumbass

1739442985536


Or eastern europeans having NO haplogroup doesn't also equal them having Chinese dna

1739443039878


Shared ancestry =/= having direct racial mixing.
 
Just reminder here, i just dont like my thread being derailed by your worthless racemixing shit video so if you fucking try again not only i would post more about sub saharan admixture but also east eurasian, and elamites admixture
Cry more. Lmao this clown is so desperate he thinks haplogroups are evidence of racemixing. Absolute retard



 
And as I've told many dumbasses you can't understand Jack shit about genetics: sharing DNA does not mean being mixed with those populations directly, hence why south europeans share DNA with somalis, yet that doesn't mean greeks or italians have somali DNA, does it? Same logic applies to arabs


View attachment 1388111

In fact, according to this map, Sicily and Greec is more somali than the arabian peninsula lmfao. But of course, again, that's not actually true since this is simply showing a haplogroup map, not total genetics or admixture with somalis
It is because Modern Balkanites and Greeks have substantial Thracian ancestry you fucking dumbass
 
What is this supposed to prove?

Because you're a dumbass who doesn't read his own papers that he sites lmfao

Both this study


And this study


that you sited are talking about mitochondrial DNA, in other words, it is talking about the relative female lineages in these populations, it is NOT talking about total black DNA.

Bring studies on autosmal DNA and then we can talk lmfao.

In summary, these results are consistent with mainly female migration from eastern Africa into Arab communities within the last few thousand years. There have been many opportunities for such migrations between eastern Africa and southern Arabia during this period. However, the most likely explanation for the presence of predominantly female lineages of African origin in other parts of the Arab world is that these may trace back to women brought from Africa as part of the Arab slave trade, assimilated into the Arabian population as a result of miscegenation and manumission.​
Yes i know that the study is not about autosomal DNA result but the study clearly state that there is some consistency between the slave trade of Africans and the increasing mtDNA of African origin in middle east.

Not to mention
The practice of manumission meant that their offspring were born free. Female slaves were, therefore, readily integrated into Islamic society Source: Lewis B (1992) Race and slavery in the Middle East: an historical enquiry; Segal R (2001) Islam’s black slaves. Atlantic, London
Yeah i admit that i purposely put that study to piss you off But You still dont refute some of the last study

1739450836461

The study specifies the use of autosomal DNA. The study mentions using genome-wide genotyping data from Yemenis, which includes the analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome. The study also used ADMIXTURE, which is a program used for estimating individual ancestries from autosomal data.

If i could try to manipulate why not?
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1388115

Shared ancestry =/= having direct racial mixing.
Your fucking mistake posting that fucking map lol :feelskek: :feelskek: :feelskek:
 
Last edited:
I'm ngl, @Racial-Identitarian you got absolutely obliterated in this thread.

Even a bottom 5% sand like Made in Anus mogs your SEAmonkey ass to oblivion.

Keep coping with muh racial supremacy while white men come to your countries and fuck all of your women for free, while you get abused if you try to go overseas, while you are seen as subhuman by the vast majority of the planet, even niggers look down on Asians and that's a fact.

What rices need is realism, not a false sense of supremacy like you.

I'd love to see you take your r/AsianMasculinity copes irl to a Western or non-Asian country and see how long you last before becoming an abused dog
 

Similar threads

Sgtpinkie
Replies
43
Views
2K
femcelbreedingnig
femcelbreedingnig
Lv99_BixNood
Replies
10
Views
1K
Made in Heaven
Made in Heaven
despisedpaul
Replies
10
Views
220
BoneHermit666
B
mrvain
Replies
10
Views
526
Sodes
Sodes

Users who are viewing this thread

  • WorthlessSlavicShit
  • slavcel11
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top