RottingMentalIago
Veteran
★★
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2025
- Posts
- 1,131
I read some post from like 2018 by a 20 something year old foid commenting on a 17 year old boy who had been suspended from his school for taking his books in a microwave to protest a backpack ban.
The foid- a curry in her twenties- wrote about how he should use his status from his stunt to get laid because looking like him he’s going to need all the help he can get.
Can you fucking imagine if some ugly 25 year old man wrote about a 17 year old girl who did some stunt that “She should use this to get laid, because with looks like hers she’s going to need all the help she can get”.
The screeching about sexualising a teenage girl, bringing sex into something that’s not relevant, and commenting on some girl’s appearance and providing sexual advice unsolicited would be obscene. The man who wrote the article would no longer have a job.
Side note: the boy wasn’t even that ugly. He was about a 5. In contrast the foid was like a 3. Of course, a 3/10 foid could bang an 8/10 Chadlite if she wanted to.
The foid- a curry in her twenties- wrote about how he should use his status from his stunt to get laid because looking like him he’s going to need all the help he can get.
Can you fucking imagine if some ugly 25 year old man wrote about a 17 year old girl who did some stunt that “She should use this to get laid, because with looks like hers she’s going to need all the help she can get”.
The screeching about sexualising a teenage girl, bringing sex into something that’s not relevant, and commenting on some girl’s appearance and providing sexual advice unsolicited would be obscene. The man who wrote the article would no longer have a job.
Side note: the boy wasn’t even that ugly. He was about a 5. In contrast the foid was like a 3. Of course, a 3/10 foid could bang an 8/10 Chadlite if she wanted to.





