An axiom is a statement accepted as true without the need for further discussion.
The greatest lie accepted by virtually all political and ideological spectrums as a premise for discussion in the 21st century is that of equality.
With all sides being equal, the only possible explanation is an environmental one:
• Men and women are equal, therefore the difference in outcome between men and women accounts for misogyny.
• Races are equal, therefore the difference in outcome between the races accounts for racism.
• Attractive men and unattractive men are equal, therefore the difference in outcome between attractive men and unattractive men accounts for personality.
Notice how the idea of everyone being equal is never questioned or established with facts and logic. We are supposed to believe in the egalitarian fairy the system has imposed on us, otherwise we are seen as intolerant and hateful.
Never start a debate by accepting as a premise that different groups are equal or ought to be treated as such. So successful was the system in implementing this notion, that even hardcore conservatives won't admit that races are unequal or that the patriarchy was a legitimate form of government.
And this comes back to bite involuntary celibates: according to most of society, there is no way on earth that attractive men have an advantage over unattractive men, therefore the cause of our suffering must be bad personalities and lack of game.
We are gaslighted into accepting this premise so we don't feel inferior to other individuals, but it does more harm than good for society. We are different. The outcome between different groups largely accounts for genetics.
Reject the egalitarian axiom.
The greatest lie accepted by virtually all political and ideological spectrums as a premise for discussion in the 21st century is that of equality.
With all sides being equal, the only possible explanation is an environmental one:
• Men and women are equal, therefore the difference in outcome between men and women accounts for misogyny.
• Races are equal, therefore the difference in outcome between the races accounts for racism.
• Attractive men and unattractive men are equal, therefore the difference in outcome between attractive men and unattractive men accounts for personality.
Notice how the idea of everyone being equal is never questioned or established with facts and logic. We are supposed to believe in the egalitarian fairy the system has imposed on us, otherwise we are seen as intolerant and hateful.
Never start a debate by accepting as a premise that different groups are equal or ought to be treated as such. So successful was the system in implementing this notion, that even hardcore conservatives won't admit that races are unequal or that the patriarchy was a legitimate form of government.
And this comes back to bite involuntary celibates: according to most of society, there is no way on earth that attractive men have an advantage over unattractive men, therefore the cause of our suffering must be bad personalities and lack of game.
We are gaslighted into accepting this premise so we don't feel inferior to other individuals, but it does more harm than good for society. We are different. The outcome between different groups largely accounts for genetics.
Reject the egalitarian axiom.
