Again, bunch of strawmans,
"only ugly can be incel"
yes but it doesnt mean I call 4/10s fakecel. Fakecel is someone who claims to be incel but isn't.
I do call 6/10 whites volcel however.
It's more than possible to spend a decade+ of your life ignored as a 6/10 White man. Thailand would always work in that case, but you're going to call someone who saves up for sex tourism in their 20s anything close to a normie?
yes I was. I called him a bragging volcel countless times. (if he isn't lying about being a virgin of course)
Couldnt stop bragging.
How he would never fuck a sub5.
How he groped stranger girls ass and got her number
How he matches with "cuties that are his looksmatch"
being KV doesnt mean shit when you look like him
volcel
I'm only familiar with the last case, where he talks about that same foid ghosting him. I don't doubt there's a way he could make things work, but he's in his third decade and he hasn't found it yet.
I don't intend to pursue it further. He seemed like a genuine guy and I never minded him.
I dont take his claims seriously. He's just saying what he needs to say to stay here and be able to spam "tbhtbh ngl"
He had sex before 18 (or at 18)
He is good looking.
He proudly admits how he never approached a single girl in real life before (and still managed to lose V)
He has 2k+ matches on tinder (from ethnic dogs, so of course they dotn count, fakecel logic)
He gets nudes from "ethnic dogs" that "every incel can get nudes from"
The dude is faker than 3 dollar bill.
I've interacted with Weed and he seems to be decent. I don't mind him either. I knew a few truecel-tier kids in high school who went after trash heap foids successfully - one was a 5'5" fat Ecuadorian, another was a Slav who looked like a bird. Apparently Weed got with the same kind of foid as they did - it could be seen as better than nothing, but it's not a great achievement or anything.
Those Thai foids are halfway across the world from him. "JBW" might work for 4+ in Thailand, but he won't make it over there any time soon.
You dont have to be rocket scientist to be able to acknowledge the conclusive data and OFFICIAL numbers.
Them being low IQ cope artists doesnt mean Im claiming to be super-duper 140 IQ.
White women are THE LEAST likely to swipe right/like inter-racially THAN ANY OTHER RACE AND GENDER (black women included)
White women are THE LEAST likely group to cohabitate (date outside of marriage) interracially amoung all races and genders (black women INCLUDED)
White women are THE LEAST likely group to racemix-marry outside of their race amoung all races and genders.
At least in the US.
There have been many threads showing the stats from dating websites, cohabiation numbers or official marriage statistics.
There's no coping your way outta this.
Me stating these facts and calling those copers dumb doesnt mean im claiming to be 140 iq rocket scientist. A first grader could BTFO those 80iq copers.
"Official" numbers. These numbers are the termini of a subsurface causal network that can't just be worked out simply as "JBW' with, moreover, an explicitly quantitative conclusion like "-3" being pulled out of nowhere. The "-3" is your own work.
Remember as well the issue of sample selection. People who uses dating apps, get married, etc. have generally different group characteristics than the whole population. Even if you see a fairly consistent (and, to my view, fairly minor) advantage enjoyed by White men
as a group, it still may be restricted to a particular type of White man. What kind of man gets married? For what (cuxbux)? Who uses dating apps? Who doesn't? Who dates at all? Not most of the people here.
(I'll need to see confirmation that White foids are more loyal than Black foids - everything I've seen says the opposite).
Ultimately, I'm fundamentally unconcerned with the dating behavior of people totally separate from me. I only care that they ignore me to begin with - I don't care for whom. Remember that these data are collected from samples of socially-integrated, NT fornicators and, at the very best, they offer some predictions about racial dating success -
within a context that exists apart from most people here.
White men
as a whole performing marginally - and it mostly appears to be marginal - better with foids doesn't say anything about "whye privilege". You'll have to understand that this concept has been beaten to death in other material arenas - Whitey's sick of getting shamed about an advantage he's never seen evidence of. I'm not going to give some Chadpreet or Chang credit for "overcoming the odds" when they effortlessly pull whores better than I could ever hope to.
All this said, you'll still have endless ethnicopers that think their - identical - problem is more important because their 0 slay count is somehow more "inevitable" than a White's.
There are many if you include small sample size studies but since you said 2 , I would say The National Child Development Study from UK as first
and
Add Health (US sample) with 18k sample size
You can also add Scotland longitudinal study to this. It also has a big sample size.
Keep in mind that US study's 3rd wave was done when respondents were at age 18-28. So they weren't child.
I'll take a look at the last two, but I've already explained my (significant) problems with the first one.
race to the bottom
for the VERY same reason why you don't see women being able to acknowledge how easy they have it over men.
they don't wanna admit they have a huge unfair unearned advantage over their ethnic looksmatch when they are complaining about how unfair things are.
Total shit. "Ethnic looksmatch" is misleading, since looks distributions are not matched between races and there's no "effort" involved in landing at a particular point on either. A 6/10 is a 6/10. It's tautological and shouldn't even need to be said. Are there fewer ethnic 6/10s than White? Sure, maybe. Regardless a true looksmatched pair has no imbalanced advantage in either direction - should be a core part of the blackpill that
looks - represented as a holistic number rating - are everything.
You're framing the issue dishonestly as some kind of insidious guilt trip - always what this leads back to.
Watch this sucker below me try to blame the media or something - the same one that paints his people as eternally suffering heroes - the same one from which he has learned all of his weepy delusions.
Most whitecels have incompetent parents who didnt teach them about the outside world. Whites can get away living in a bubble all their life, totally oblivious about struggles of others. A big problem in mayo community is lack of empathy. They just dont understand it.
JFL, get a load of this hypocrite and his tortuous copes.
As far as I can tell from your repertoire of "Just Be an /s Theory bro" and "cope" posts, your "struggles" are confined to not being able to think and express yourself intelligently.
That is the racepill. How can you downplay this? That is the entire point! If you were born the wrong race, you will on average be shorter, uglier, have crappier skin/eye color, have a smaller dick, have less muscle mass, have smaller bones, be less masculine, and thus far more likely to be incel.
But it's a QUOTE "disadvantage", and it's "just" an "artefact".
No big deal buddy. It's just an artefact. There's no real disadvantage there. Just change everything your race gave you by default and you'll be good to go.
It's just a likelihood. How many times is it necessary to say?
Born ethinc? Probability is greater that you'll be born ugly.
Born White? Probability is less that you'll be born ugly.
Born ugly? Well, whatever you are at the next level up, fundamentally - you wound up ugly. Is the ugly White man's consolation prize the dream that if he were to be unborn and roll the dice a second time he'd have a better chance at getting something good out of it?
