Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious The definition of incel is taken too literally.

lowz1r

lowz1r

need yandere gf
★★★★★
Joined
Jun 1, 2024
Posts
15,585
Online time
12h 1m
A lot of incels (especially younger ones) end up "ascending" later in life once a foid is finally ready to settle down.

But I've come to realize that not all oofy doofy relationships rely exclusively on betabuxxing. In fact, those are probably less common than you think now that so many foids are out-earning men.

Many foids enter relationships simply for the stability and comfort they provide. Foids eventually get tired of using dating apps and getting pumped and dumped over and over again. They realize that the only way they can have companionship is if they settle for an uglier beta male. This is water, but a lot of people here mistake this as betabuxxing.

A foid can and in many cases will be with a man she's not attracted to, even if she doesn't need financial support. I argue that this is still not ascension for the man. This is the man taking care of a sexually retired foid who is past her reproductive prime. The foid does not intend to allow the man's genes to propagate, even if they do have sex. Despite the literal definition of incel, I still consider such a man to be an incel, albeit one living under different circumstances.

The incel condition isn't just about not being able to have sex; it's about failing to pass sexual selection. At the end of the day, both the truecel and the oofy doofy will die without having the opportunity to pass on their genes. If Chad died childless, it was a voluntary decision. Whether or not a man intends to have kids isn't relevant. What is relevant is the female monolith's collective willingness to carry his seed. That is what truly separates Chads from incels.
 
Bring back that AI foid avi.
 
Involuntarily celibate technically means any man who wants romance/sex but can't get it. So he technically isn't an incel. She's still choosing his dick over nothing. Even though it's not genuine desire
I don't think reproductive failure means inceldom. They aren't incels cause genes didn't propagate. The blackpill is just sexual/romantic market value and access
You can't really redefine the term to someone who doesn't get genuine romantic/sexual desire
 
If you can make this in to a Research Topic thread, then I might be able to accept this.
You literally could become the next venerated saint on this forum.
 
Involuntarily celibate technically means any man who wants romance/sex but can't get it. So he technically isn't an incel. She's still choosing his dick over nothing. Even though it's not genuine desire
I don't think reproductive failure means inceldom. They aren't incels cause genes didn't propagate. The blackpill is just sexual/romantic market value and access
You can't really redefine the term to someone who doesn't get genuine romantic/sexual desire
If we ignore the semantics, I think potential for reproductive success is a more accurate way to identify incels. After all, the reason foids desire Chads over us in the first place is their natural urge to select for better genetics.
 
If you can make this in to a Research Topic thread, then I might be able to accept this.
You literally could become the next venerated saint on this forum.
:lul:
 
A betabuxxer isn't the same as an incel because he was picked by a woman and is still having sex. Most reproduction occurs in betabuxx relationships. The average age when women have their first child is in their 30s in the West to their betabuxx husband whom they settled for.
 
A betabuxxer isn't the same as an incel because he was picked by a woman and is still having sex. Most reproduction occurs in betabuxx relationships. The average age when women have their first child is in their 30s in the West to their betabuxx husband whom they settled for.
A woman having her first child in her 30s is incredibly dysgenic and is more often than not a result of her inability to get Chad to commit during her younger years (that and being brainwashed by feminism).

Speaking of the west, single moms are so common over there that they've become a meme. They probably reproduced with the man they were attracted to and then tried to leech off a betabuxxer later.

If betabuxxing really is the solution to inceldom, then inceldom becomes more a matter of not having the money instead of not having the looks.
 
Last edited:
A woman having her first child in her 30s is incredibly dysgenic and is more often than not a result of her inability to get Chad to commit during her younger years (that and being brainwashed by feminism).

Speaking of the west, single moms are so common over there that they've become a meme. They probably reproduced with the man they were attracted to and then tried to leech off a betabuxxer later.

If betabuxxing really is the solution to inceldom, then inceldom becomes more a matter of not having the money instead of not having the looks.
I never said it was eugenic and I never said it was the solution. I said it's not the same thing and many betabux end up reproducing.
 
True, I also think betabux and oofy doofy are too easily intertwined, even though they largely lead to the same results. Many women do want a man who they know will always be there. Will she be loyal without that raw attraction? I'm not going to be the guy playing that mindfuck. Having kids doesn't prevent destruction, either.
 
A lot of incels (especially younger ones) end up "ascending" later in life once a foid is finally ready to settle down.

But I've come to realize that not all oofy doofy relationships rely exclusively on betabuxxing. In fact, those are probably less common than you think now that so many foids are out-earning men.

Many foids enter relationships simply for the stability and comfort they provide. Foids eventually get tired of using dating apps and getting pumped and dumped over and over again. They realize that the only way they can have companionship is if they settle for an uglier beta male. This is water, but a lot of people here mistake this as betabuxxing.

A foid can and in many cases will be with a man she's not attracted to, even if she doesn't need financial support. I argue that this is still not ascension for the man. This is the man taking care of a sexually retired foid who is past her reproductive prime. The foid does not intend to allow the man's genes to propagate, even if they do have sex. Despite the literal definition of incel, I still consider such a man to be an incel, albeit one living under different circumstances.

The incel condition isn't just about not being able to have sex; it's about failing to pass sexual selection. At the end of the day, both the truecel and the oofy doofy will die without having the opportunity to pass on their genes. If Chad died childless, it was a voluntary decision. Whether or not a man intends to have kids isn't relevant. What is relevant is the female monolith's collective willingness to carry his seed. That is what truly separates Chads from incels.
Yeah, they just want a male nurse + assistant basically as they enter their twilight years.

While they remain still somewhat fuckable I’m sure many of these arrangements are open cuck relationships as well which no man with any self worth whatsoever would ever tolerate.

I don’t know how porn whore Brandi Love’s husband can stand it?

Even if he’s getting mad pussy from young 18 year old porn whores his wife brings home to him or he can get them and other hot women through his own efforts because he’s just that much of a Chad I still don’t understand how he can be cool with the woman that he presumably loves getting her back blown out by numerous porn giga Chads for the whole world to see??
 
Last edited:
Even if he’s getting mad pussy from young 18 year old porn whores his wife brings home to him or he can get them and other hot women through his own efforts because he’s just that much of a Chad I still don’t understand how he can be cool with the woman that he presumably loves getting her back blown out by numerous porn giga Chads for the whole world to see??
Probably just degeneracy.
 
A lot of incels (especially younger ones) end up "ascending" later in life once a foid is finally ready to settle down.

But I've come to realize that not all oofy doofy relationships rely exclusively on betabuxxing. In fact, those are probably less common than you think now that so many foids are out-earning men.

Many foids enter relationships simply for the stability and comfort they provide. Foids eventually get tired of using dating apps and getting pumped and dumped over and over again. They realize that the only way they can have companionship is if they settle for an uglier beta male. This is water, but a lot of people here mistake this as betabuxxing.

A foid can and in many cases will be with a man she's not attracted to, even if she doesn't need financial support. I argue that this is still not ascension for the man. This is the man taking care of a sexually retired foid who is past her reproductive prime. The foid does not intend to allow the man's genes to propagate, even if they do have sex. Despite the literal definition of incel, I still consider such a man to be an incel, albeit one living under different circumstances.

The incel condition isn't just about not being able to have sex; it's about failing to pass sexual selection. At the end of the day, both the truecel and the oofy doofy will die without having the opportunity to pass on their genes. If Chad died childless, it was a voluntary decision. Whether or not a man intends to have kids isn't relevant. What is relevant is the female monolith's collective willingness to carry his seed. That is what truly separates Chads from incels.
High IQ post
 
Being an oofy doofy who betabuxxes is worse than being incel.
 
An interesting way to think about things
 
It’s lost all it’s original meaning
 
The incel condition isn't just about not being able to have sex; it's about failing to pass sexual selection. At the end of the day, both the truecel and the oofy doofy will die without having the opportunity to pass on their genes. If Chad died childless, it was a voluntary decision. Whether or not a man intends to have kids isn't relevant. What is relevant is the female monolith's collective willingness to carry his seed. That is what truly separates Chads from incels.
Oh, it is ascension. Many of these lower-tier normie men are so happy, after all those lonely years, to play the oofy doofy. They may even gratefully help raise some other man's kid. Perhaps you, too, one day hope to play this role in exchange for non-paid sex. More power to you.

Still, the term you're overlooking is nearcel. Under the same umbrella, but still a sex-haver. Not accurate to call someone like your describe involuntarily celibate when they're getting sloppy, later-life sex.
 
don t be a free agent in life!
betabuxx isnt real ascension, since 1.you could just go and pay whores and maybe they will let you fuck them
2.she doesn t really want you, but more because what you offer, i m not even going to talk how the relationship with that oofy doofy will be bad and probably sexless

that s why teenlove is important, that s the only time where a foid might want you, because you are you, and not because she wants you to pay her bills just so that she could cheat or remember the 345 guys she fucked and the 500 cocks she sucked during her life
 
A lot of incels (especially younger ones) end up "ascending" later in life once a foid is finally ready to settle down.

But I've come to realize that not all oofy doofy relationships rely exclusively on betabuxxing. In fact, those are probably less common than you think now that so many foids are out-earning men.

Many foids enter relationships simply for the stability and comfort they provide. Foids eventually get tired of using dating apps and getting pumped and dumped over and over again. They realize that the only way they can have companionship is if they settle for an uglier beta male. This is water, but a lot of people here mistake this as betabuxxing.

A foid can and in many cases will be with a man she's not attracted to, even if she doesn't need financial support. I argue that this is still not ascension for the man. This is the man taking care of a sexually retired foid who is past her reproductive prime. The foid does not intend to allow the man's genes to propagate, even if they do have sex. Despite the literal definition of incel, I still consider such a man to be an incel, albeit one living under different circumstances.

The incel condition isn't just about not being able to have sex; it's about failing to pass sexual selection. At the end of the day, both the truecel and the oofy doofy will die without having the opportunity to pass on their genes. If Chad died childless, it was a voluntary decision. Whether or not a man intends to have kids isn't relevant. What is relevant is the female monolith's collective willingness to carry his seed. That is what truly separates Chads from incels.
so if you're not chad you're incel ?
 
Involuntarily celibate technically means any man who wants romance/sex but can't get it. So he technically isn't an incel. She's still choosing his dick over nothing. Even though it's not genuine desire
I don't think reproductive failure means inceldom. They aren't incels cause genes didn't propagate. The blackpill is just sexual/romantic market value and access
You can't really redefine the term to someone who doesn't get genuine romantic/sexual desire
I still feel sorry for those types, shits even happening to moderately attractive men. Women have become fucking vampires, all they care about is themselves and using men and tearing them down and talking shit behinds their back and fucking their friends. I think a hard right back to the 1950s regarding women would do this country a favor besides the rascism im not too racist.
 
Last edited:
Even then, what you describe is for normies only. Incels remain invisible to foids even when they retire from cock carousel.
 
Yes, I think the dividing line is being seen as a sexual creature or being a cockroach.

Billy beta or oofy doofy might even procreate but it's begrudgingly and with SIDS and Post partum depression on the uptick.

I'd disagree that there's no financial angle to it. Just because the man isn't paying for everything doesn't mean that it's not about money. His money gets drained for retirement and the mortgage so she can continue to contribute to the %88 of consumer spending. There's even commercials telling women to stop being stupid bitches and save for retirement now.

I am not envious of some 30whatever year old marrying his first real girlfriend and living some "dad-life" where his wife suddenly realizes she's not a sexual person after the second kid is born.
 
This is supported by gangestad and Thornhill study that confirms dual mating strategy.

One of the most blackpilling studies I've ever read.
 
But I've come to realize that not all oofy doofy relationships rely exclusively on betabuxxing. In fact, those are probably less common than you think now that so many foids are out-earning men.

Many foids enter relationships simply for the stability and comfort they provide.
You still need to be NT to get into those relationships. Oofy doofy, betabuxx and cuck stuff isn't even an option for ugly autists. Women never settle for ugly spergs.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top