It's the male instinct to have sex with as many women as possible, any way possible. Just because women don't want to have sex with me, doesn't mean I don't want to have sex with them. But you will never see me grab a woman's ass at the grocery store and start fucking her. There's laws against that which represses that instinct.
Yet, the female sexual instinct is not similarly repressed. Their instinct is to have sex with the most dominant/good looking/criminal males they can possibly find. That shouldn't be allowed. Queue some fat landwhale or effeminate numale telling me it's not comparable, because in the first instance I am violating someone's consent and therefore their rights but in the case of females, they are not violating anyone's rights because "muhh freedom of association". WRONG. Let's explain why:
So let's say at some point I get tired of paying taxes and I just stop completely. Most people(with the exception of anarcho-capitalists) would say that's a crime and that I should go to jail for it. But who am I really hurting by not paying my taxes? Not the government-they don't need my money, so there has to be another reason why people would want me thrown in jail. It's because people know that some portion of tax money goes to supporting infrastructure and the needs of people like healthcare, the police force, jobs, etc. So by not paying my taxes, I'm not hurting one particular person but society as a whole.
Similarly, the female is not hurting any one individual when she chases degenerate men like criminals and douchebags. Nor is she hurting any one individual when she chases highly attractive or powerful men, but society at large. When women are whores for evil men, they empower them and hurt good men by depriving them of much needed affection. Further, men will themselves seek to emulate evil behavior to be sexually successful, making the situation even worse. When they are whores for only attractive men, they skew the natural equilibrium. Eventually, there is an inflated sense of despair and resentment in society, not to mention degeneracy, and society itself will collapse.
Yet, the female sexual instinct is not similarly repressed. Their instinct is to have sex with the most dominant/good looking/criminal males they can possibly find. That shouldn't be allowed. Queue some fat landwhale or effeminate numale telling me it's not comparable, because in the first instance I am violating someone's consent and therefore their rights but in the case of females, they are not violating anyone's rights because "muhh freedom of association". WRONG. Let's explain why:
So let's say at some point I get tired of paying taxes and I just stop completely. Most people(with the exception of anarcho-capitalists) would say that's a crime and that I should go to jail for it. But who am I really hurting by not paying my taxes? Not the government-they don't need my money, so there has to be another reason why people would want me thrown in jail. It's because people know that some portion of tax money goes to supporting infrastructure and the needs of people like healthcare, the police force, jobs, etc. So by not paying my taxes, I'm not hurting one particular person but society as a whole.
Similarly, the female is not hurting any one individual when she chases degenerate men like criminals and douchebags. Nor is she hurting any one individual when she chases highly attractive or powerful men, but society at large. When women are whores for evil men, they empower them and hurt good men by depriving them of much needed affection. Further, men will themselves seek to emulate evil behavior to be sexually successful, making the situation even worse. When they are whores for only attractive men, they skew the natural equilibrium. Eventually, there is an inflated sense of despair and resentment in society, not to mention degeneracy, and society itself will collapse.
Last edited:
