Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

The Contraceptive Pill

CrackyChanFan

CrackyChanFan

Self-banned
-
Joined
May 8, 2018
Posts
279
The invention of the contraceptive pill is quite possibly one of the most radical changes to human society in 100s of years.

Think about it; for all of human history normal sexual intercourse/ meant pregnancy was highly likely if not inevitable. Naturally, to make sure fathers were raising their actual biological children, to make sure children were born into wedlock in a stable home, and to make sure society in general was stable, marriage became necessary and one woman was tied to one man and it was ideal that she should be a virgin until the wedding night (so the man would know his children were his and he was not getting cuckolded). Pre-marital sex had immense stigma and bastard children were often shunned.

Then in the 60s the pill is introduced to mass society and by the mid to late sixties you have the sexual Revolution. The rapid de-stigmatisation of pre-marital sex. Most women of child bearing age in the west have their hormones artificially made haywire using chemicals.

As Chairman Mao once said when asked about the French Revolution ‘It’s too early to tell.’

I feel like we are one of the symptoms of the great change in culture that occurred in the west in the 60s. Sixties counterculture was, at its heart, really about sex; the other western cultural changes at that time (rebellion against authority, flirtations with Marxism, anti-war, drug use) were byproducts of the rapid change in attitudes towards pre marital sex between the baby boomers and their parents.
 
Western foids were always free whores for Chads, 60s contraceptive revolution helped them immensely as they're not in fear of falling pregnant after their usual bouts with a multitude anymore, as if the fear of falling pregnant was a very good deterrent in the first place anyway:feelskek:
 
lifefuel that whores on birth-control will not get pregnant while fucking chads and then when they age their eggs go rotten and they can never have whore daughters
it is for the good in the long rung
 
Ask me about the early life section of the inventors.
 
Yet another thing that enables them to whore around without consequences.
 
What about it?
Medical breakthrough is a medical breakthrough, it can happen from anywhere.
:bluepill:

It's always the Chosenites that come up with the most depraved inventions and developments.
 
The invention of the contraceptive pill is quite possibly one of the most radical changes to human society in 100s of years.
Indeed. It tilts the balance of power absurdly towards the female side. Add in abortions for the final emergency measure and you have women literally deciding the future of the human race. And we all know how great logical thinkers and decision-makers they are to leave the fate of the human species in their hands.

Just think. A woman now has the power to completely deny a man a genetic legacy. For all of their cries of rape (being impregnated with subhuman seed being the primary concern), she can now nip chad's seed in the bud, because gigachad slid into her DMs working to slide into her wombhole. She can cuck you at her whims on every conceivable level, from societal advantages in the workforce thanks to affirmative action, all the way to the evolution of the species at large. They were given power in modern society with every technology available to them and the first thing they did with it was become full blown whores for the top 20% (now 10% or less) of men and reverted back to early caveman behavior (unchecked hypergamy).

Another 100 years of this shit and we'll all be doomed.
 
Stormcels are just as bluepilled as their opposition, they defend the status quo and side with conservacucks.
You're simply mad at men who are smarter than you.
Image0 17
 
They have made tons of other contributions to medical science, so I don't buy your point. But yes, Jewish people are smart, it's widely known.
:feelswhat:
The average IQ of Israel is 95. Jewish migrants to US in early 20 th century were described as feeble minded along with Eastern Europeans. Ashekanzi Jews which are a minority of Jews have an average IQ of 103 which is comparable to Korean or Swedish average.

There is no explanation for Jewish success other than the fact that they conspire together
 
:feelswhat:
The average IQ of Israel is 95. Jewish migrants to US in early 20 th century were described as feeble minded along with Eastern Europeans. Ashekanzi Jews which are a minority of Jews have an average IQ of 103 which is comparable to Korean or Swedish average.

There is no explanation for Jewish success other than the fact that they conspire together
Thank you. I'm getting tired of the Jewish IQ myth constantly being perpetuated. At least @CWCville gentrifier (((outed))) himself here.
 
:feelswhat:
The average IQ of Israel is 95. Jewish migrants to US in early 20 th century were described as feeble minded along with Eastern Europeans. Ashekanzi Jews which are a minority of Jews have an average IQ of 103 which is comparable to Korean or Swedish average.

There is no explanation for Jewish success other than the fact that they conspire together
Cope.
You're intelltionally burying the lead and missing the point. Intelligence can have different distribution in different populations.
Rices, for example, are smarter on average but have less geniuses.
Also JFL at muh conspiracy :lul:
It's a fucking medical invention which has been tested by time. You're the one who is fooling the people here.
 
Last edited:
Cope.
You're intelltionally burying the lead and missing the point. Intelligence can have different distribution in different populations.
Rices, for example, are smarter on average but have less geniuses.
Also JFL at muh conspiracy :lul:
It's a fucking medical invention which has been tested by time. You're the one who is fooling the people here.
Jewish population of US is only 6.4 million or approximately 2% of the population. Their average IQ isn't in 130's and they are not some super geniuses and yet they dominate the media.

In 1933 Germany Jewish population was about 0.75% and it was even lower in 1918 when the red revolution started. And yet despite that just by looking at the names of leading revolutionaries you see that several of them are Jews. Now that screws you over because it proves that Jews conspire together as a group. Then the argument is no longer "a Jew is successful and does well in business" but a Jew is a communist that conspires to overthrow the government with fellow Jews.
 
Then the argument is no longer "a Jew is successful and does well in business" but a Jew is a communist that conspires to overthrow the government with fellow Jews.
:feelsseriously:
You're still talking about intelligence-demanding activities. Political organizing isn't that much different from running a business. Political theory is not just like a science, it is a science.
Again, you're forgetting a lot of things like the rampant anti-Semitism in Germany. Why should I be suprised when minorities rise up against their oppressors? You're being silly.
 
:feelsseriously:
You're still talking about intelligence-demanding activities. Political organizing isn't that much different from running a business. Political theory is not just like a science, it is a science.
Again, you're forgetting a lot of things like the rampant anti-Semitism in Germany. Why should I be suprised when minorities rise up against their oppressors? You're being silly.
Go ahead. Name one oppressive law against Jews during that time.:soy:
 
Go ahead. Name one oppressive law against Jews during that time.:soy:
If you're this interested in the topic, you can look for that yourself.
But as always, your argumentation is flawed. Oppression doesn't stop or begin with pen and paper.
 
If you're this interested in the topic, you can look for that yourself.
But as always, your argumentation is flawed. Oppression doesn't stop or begin with pen and paper.
Lol I can defeat you in every argument.

Rosa Luxemburg the poor poor oppressed Jew was an educated woman from a wealthy Jewish family. Her grandfather Abraham Luxemburg already arming and financially supporting rebels in 1863 January uprising.

What a strange coincidence. :soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
Lol I can defeat you in every argument.

Rosa Luxemburg the poor poor oppressed Jew was an educated woman from a wealthy Jewish family. Her grandfather Abraham Luxemburg already arming and financially supporting rebels in 1863 January uprising.

What a strange coincidence. :soy::soy::soy::soy:
Again, what is your point? You can be from an opressed ethnic/religious group and be relatively well off, big deal.
Where did I deny the fact that some leading socialists were rich or had progressive relatives?
You're grasping at straws.
 
Again, what is your point? You can be from an opressed ethnic/religious group and be relatively well off, big deal.
Where did I deny the fact that some leading socialists were rich or had progressive relatives?
You're grasping at straws.
You said "Why should I be suprised when minorities rise up against their oppressors? " implying that Jewish communist revolution leaders were rising against their oppressors. Then I debunked your claim showing not only that they were rich well off, not oppressed at all but that even their ancestors did the same filthy things decades ago.

You keep moving the goalpost. Now we are arguing that wealthy elite Jews "rebelled" because other Jews were oppressed. And you haven't even brought up a single piece evidence that Jews were oppressed at that time
 
Then I debunked your claim showing not only that they were rich well off, not oppressed at all but that even their ancestors did the same filthy things decades ago.
LE DEBOONK :soy::soy::soy:
Luxembourg felt an ethnic solidarity with all other Jews and an empathy for the working class, it's not like she did the uprising alone by herself. Opressed people followed.
Now we are arguing that wealthy elite Jews "rebelled" because other Jews were oppressed. And you haven't even brought up a single piece evidence that Jews were oppressed at that time
Why should I when history itself has proved her right? What she witnessed in Tsarist Russia happened again in Nazi Germany.
Again, are you really going to argue that the Weimar Republic had no antisemitic underbelly?
 
Why should I when history itself has proved her right? What she witnessed in Tsarist Russia happened again in Nazi Germany.
Again, are you really going to argue that the Weimar Republic had no antisemitic underbelly?

You're some kind of kike aren't you? Either that or a communist. Come clean boyo
 
You're some kind of kike aren't you? Either that or a communist. Come clean boyo
:feelsseriously:
Yeah, there are only 3 types of people: stormcels, goyish communists and Jews. Nothing besides that and nothing in-between. Just fucking lol.
To be honest, I used to dabble in stormcel shit like this and I still clown on the normies using ironic Nazism/antisemitism but I have enough of the brain left to know what's up. It just doesn't add up, you know?
I mean, true, some super white Ashkenazim seemingly have everything in their reach and lead perfect lives, but that's not what the society is about.
I took the blackpill.
 
:feelsseriously:
Yeah, there are only 3 types of people: stormcels, goyish communists and Jews. Nothing besides that and nothing in-between. Just fucking lol.
To be honest, I used to dabble in stormcel shit like this and I still clown on the normies using ironic Nazism/antisemitism but I have enough of the brain left to know what's up. It just doesn't add up, you know?
I mean, true, some super white Ashkenazim seemingly have everything in their reach and lead perfect lives, but that's not what the society is about.
I took the blackpill.
I don't care what you describe yourself as. I told you what you are. You're a Jewish apologist, identical to negroid apologists who will find an excuse to justify every negroid behaviour. They are looting because they are oppressed, they score lower on the IQ tests because of systemic racism etc etc.

To you a Jew can never do any wrong. It's the German's fault for oppressing poor Jews. It's the Cyproid Greeks fault for the genocide on Cyprus. Every single time Jews have been expelled it's because of irrational "antisemitism" under which super kind super high IQ superior people keep being blamed for something they never did- :feelswhat:
 
I don't care what you describe yourself as.
Then don't ask.
You're a Jewish apologist, identical to negroid apologists who will find an excuse to justify every negroid behaviour. They are looting because they are oppressed, they score lower on the IQ tests because of systemic racism etc etc.
You're projecting your feeble white apologia onto everybody else. If whites were innocent, nobody would be resentful of them.
 
Then don't ask.

You're projecting your feeble white apologia onto everybody else. If whites were innocent, nobody would be resentful of them.
They weren't. Even when slavery just ended and when blacks were 2nd class they were less resentful than today. You know why they are resentful today though Jew. It has something to do with the media telling them how oppressed they are 24/7
 
why are the high IQ posts always the most hurtful :feelsrope:
 
Even when slavery just ended and when blacks were 2nd class they were less resentful than today.
Out of the ass statement, but whatever.
It has something to do with the media telling them how oppressed they are 24/7
Again, you're projecting. You'd probably be a decent person intellectually if the neo-Nazis didn't fuck your brain 24/7.
The difference in experiences though is staggering: black opression is real while the tales of white victimhood are largely not.
You're literally complaining about the opressed people knowing more about their situation, their place in history. It's like telling incels to reject blackpill.
 
@Blackpill Rage Why aren't you adding @CWCville gentrifier to your list?
 
We need the pill for men. This already exists in Indonesia. With male birth control pill we could put the sluts back on the leash. Men have no biological clock. This would change society back to normal again.
 
We need the pill for men. This already exists in Indonesia. With male birth control pill we could put the sluts back on the leash. Men have no biological clock. This would change society back to normal again.
I don’t agree. The issue is that before the 60s, before the pill and before the destigmatisation of pre-marital sex and no-fault divorce, women were forced to select ideally just one life long sexual partner. Thus, as not all women could get the top 20% of men, they had to settle for a man more on their level; moreover, women were forced to compromise on their instinct to mate with an alpha and settle down with a beta. Before the 60s, women could not easily do the alpha fux beta bux strategy they employ today so easily; women had to start with someone reliable.

If sex automatically means high likelihood of pregnancy then sex means commitment and women as a whole have to thing very very carefully about who they chose as a lifelong partner to have sex with.

The problem itself is birth control.
 

Similar threads

NotTheElliot
Replies
10
Views
295
ItsovERfucks
ItsovERfucks
AsiaCel
Replies
4
Views
151
wereq
wereq
Buried Alive 2.0
Replies
21
Views
499
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
Replies
3
Views
239
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top